Recently, former President Trump raised the question: could he strip prominent U.S. citizens, like Elon Musk or Assembly Member Zohran Mamdani, of their citizenship? While the idea sounds alarming, it’s worth examining how U.S. law views denaturalization and involuntary loss of citizenship.
Why It’s Raising Alarm
Denaturalization isn’t a new tool, it has been used sparingly, mostly in cases involving war criminals or naturalization fraud. But recent political rhetoric is stirring concern. Trump has suggested revoking citizenship based on perceived national security threats or political opposition. Mamdani, a Uganda-born naturalized American and elected official, has faced public threats to his citizenship. Musk, who was naturalized after immigrating from South Africa, has also been referenced in public discourse.
If such powers were used for political retaliation, it could undermine constitutional protections and create fear among naturalized citizens, especially those who are politically active.
What the Law Actually Says
Legal Authority to Strip Citizenship
The U.S. Supreme Court has consistently held that citizenship is a constitutional right. In Afroyim v. Rusk (1967), the Court ruled that the government cannot revoke citizenship unless a person voluntarily relinquishes it. The ruling emphasized that the 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship, and no act of Congress can override that right without due process.
Exceptions for Fraud or Misrepresentation
There are, however, exceptions. If someone obtained citizenship through intentional fraud or misrepresentation, by concealing crimes, falsifying identity, or lying on immigration forms, the government can seek to revoke that citizenship. These are civil denaturalization cases, and they require clear and convincing evidence.
Criminal Acts and National Security
Criminal activity alone, even serious offenses, does not automatically result in denaturalization. In Trop v. Dulles (1958), the Supreme Court ruled that stripping citizenship as a punishment for desertion violated the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
The government may prosecute individuals for crimes or deport non-citizens. But once someone becomes a citizen, only a narrow set of circumstances allow the government to take that status away.
Vance v. Terrazas (1980) further clarified that intent matters, citizenship can only be lost if the individual intended to relinquish it, not simply by performing certain acts like voting in a foreign election.
Arguments For and Against Expanded Power
For
-
Some argue the government needs more tools to respond to citizens who threaten national security, commit terrorism, or fraudulently obtained citizenship.
-
In rare cases, revoking citizenship could serve as a deterrent against abuse of the naturalization process.
Against
-
Critics say expanding denaturalization power opens the door to abuse, especially if political leaders use it to silence opposition.
-
Citizenship is a fundamental right, and removing it on subjective or political grounds undermines democratic values.
-
Courts have consistently raised the standard for denaturalization to prevent misuse.
What You Should Know
In practice, denaturalization is rare and difficult to achieve. The government cannot arbitrarily strip someone of their citizenship without substantial legal justification and due process. However, as political rhetoric intensifies, legal experts caution that aggressive or unconstitutional applications of these powers could test long-standing protections.
If you’re a naturalized U.S. citizen, especially in a high-profile role, political office, or leadership position, it’s important to know your rights. Reviewing your naturalization process, understanding any potential risks, and staying informed on new legal challenges is prudent.
How We Can Help
At KAASS LAW, we assist clients in:
-
Reviewing and confirming the integrity of their naturalization record
-
Responding to federal notices or inquiries related to citizenship status
-
Defending against denaturalization attempts or politically motivated legal actions
-
Educating clients on constitutional protections and due process rights
This is a time to stay informed, not afraid. While the law still favors the protection of citizenship, the conversation around denaturalization is clearly shifting. We are here to help you navigate this landscape with knowledge and legal clarity.
Concerned about your citizenship status or rights?
Contact KAASS LAW at (844) 522-7752 or email [email protected] for a confidential consultation.