Under California Penal Code Section 647(i), also known as the “peeping Tom” law, it is illegal to peek into a door or window on someone else’s private property without the consent of the owner for observing persons who are inside.
The prosecutor must establish the following elements for convicting the defendant in the offense of peeking while loitering:
Under California Penal Code 647(i) any building which is used as a residence can be considered an inhabited structure. It is not important whether someone is inside at the time of peeking or not, a person can be charged with peeking while loitering even if no one is at the property.
Penal Code 647(i) doesn’t require specific intent, and it is not important why a person decided to peek into a door or window on someone else’s private property. So a person can be convicted even if he entered the property without intent to loiter or peek.
Defendant had a reason to be on property
In case the defendant had a lawful reason to be on property (working as contractor or was a meter reader or surveyor), he can’t be found guilty under Penal Code Section 647(i).
Defendant was not on a private property
As an essential element of this offense defendant must be on a private property. It is not unlawful to look through the window or a door of an inhabited structure while standing or being on public property or your own property.
Defendant entered an uninhabited building or structure
In case the defendant was peeked into an uninhabited structure or former inhabited dwelling he should not face a peeking while loitering conviction.
Under California Penal Code Section 647(i) unlawful peeking is a misdemeanor offence and the penalties are the following:
The penalties for second or subsequent offense or a first time offense in case the person being viewed is a minor are the following:
Depending on the case circumstances and the defendant’s criminal history he can be sentenced to misdemeanor probation instead of the jail time. Judge may impose different conditions on that probation, such as periodic court appearances, paying restitution to the victim or staying away from the property and the victim, not committing this offense anywhere else. In case the defendant has two or more prior felony convictions, a prior felony conviction during which he was armed or a prior conviction for a serious felony he can’t be entitled to informal probation.
For answers to any other questions you may still have about California Penal Code 657(i) charges or to discuss your case confidentially with our team of experienced California criminal defense attorneys give us a call at (310) 943-1171. Our lawyers in Glendale, Los Angeles County, CA, are highly dedicated to serving the needs of our clients.
Truck accidents, often resulting in serious injuries and fatalities, have a profound impact on road safety. Preventing truck accidents is…
In the world of transportation, the trucking industry serves as a backbone for the movement of goods across the country.…
Truck accidents can have horrific results, including serious injuries, fatalities, and substantial legal repercussions. A number of well-known truck accident…
With its ability to move cargo over long distances and maintain the flow of the supply chain, the trucking industry…
Since we share the road with an increasing number of commercial trucks, it becomes imperative to understand the challenges faced…
Truck accidents are not just confined to traffic regulations. They often traverse into the complex territory of criminal liability. Understanding…