General

KAASS LAW v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 799 F.3d 1290 (9th Cir. 2015)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit KAASS LAW v. Wells Fargo

On August 27, 2015 KAASS LAW filed docket number D.C. No. 2:12-cv-08356-RGK-JC with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and challenged the district court’s decision in granting Wells Fargo’s motion for sanctions under 28 U.S.C. 1927.

This issue was raised for the first time in history on appeal by KAASS LAW. On appeal KAASS LAW made two principal arguments, however before hearing the second argument, the panel held that § 1927 does not permit the imposition of sanctions against a law firm. The 9th Circuit Court reversed and vacated the district court’s order, holding that § 1927 does not permit sanctions against a law firm. Thus, the panel reversed the district court’s decision in granting Well Fargo’s motion for sanctions against KAASS LAW pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927, and vacated the order imposing sanctions on KAASS LAW.

First Argument:

KAASS LAW argued the district court abused its discretion by imposing sanctions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 because sanctions under that statute can only be made against an individual attorney, and not against a law firm.

Second Argument:

KAASS LAW’s second argument opposed the district court’s finding of bad faith. However, the 9th Circuit agreed with KAASS LAW’s first argument that the district court abused its discretion when it imposed sanctions against a law firm pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927. Thus, the court did not reach the second argument.

KAASS LAW is authorized to practice law in California. The above content is intended for California residents only. This content provides only general information which may or may not reflect current legal developments. KAASS LAW expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any of the contents of this website. The above content DOES NOT create an attorney-client relationship. KAASS LAW does not represent you unless you have expressly retained KAASS LAW in person at the KAASS LAW office.

KAASS LAW helps clients in: Los Angeles, Burbank, Hollywood, Glendale, Van Nuys, North Hollywood, Studio City, Highland Park, Eagle Rock, Sunland, Tujunga, Sylmar, San Bernardino, La Crescenta, La Canada, Beverly Hills, Westwood, Santa Monica, Brentwood. Pacoima, Montebello, Commerce, Alhambra, Downey, Bell, Maywood, Walnut Park, Vernon, Lynwood, Echo Park, Silverlake, Mission Hills, Northridge, Woodland Hills, Encino, Canoga Park, North Hills, Porter Ranch, Chatsworth, Reseda.

Kaass AK

Recent Posts

Airbag Deployment Injuries: Hearing Damage and Pericardial Effusion

The Hidden Risks of Airbag Deployment One of the most crucial safety features in contemporary cars is the airbag. In…

10 hours ago

Understanding the FMCSA Structure: Who Regulates Trucking?

After a serious truck accident, you will often hear references to "FMCSA regulations." The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)…

1 day ago

Eaton Fire Report Liability: Failures Found, But Who Is at Fault?

Months after the devastating Eaton Fire swept through Altadena and surrounding communities, Los Angeles County has released its long-awaited after-action…

3 days ago

Work Zone Truck Accidents: Determining Liability in a Danger Zone

Road construction is a constant presence on California's busy highways. While these work zones are necessary, they also create temporary…

3 days ago

CVC 23115a: Why Tossing a Cigarette Can Lead to a Lawsuit

It’s a common sight on California's roads. A driver flicks a still-lit cigarette butt out of their car window. Many…

3 days ago

FMCSA Regulations: How They Impact Your Truck Accident Claim

When a large commercial truck is involved in an accident, the consequences are often devastating. Furthermore, these incidents are rarely…

3 days ago