Stay updated with the latest legal news, expert analysis, and firm updates from KAASS LAW.
Whether you're facing a legal challenge or seeking proactive counsel, our award-winning team is ready to defend your interests.
Prescription drugs play a vital role in managing health conditions, but they can also be misused and abused. California law takes a strong stance against prescription fraud, including forging or altering prescriptions. These actions not only endanger public health but also carry severe legal consequences. At KAASS LAW, we understand the complexities of prescription drug laws and are committed to providing accurate legal information and representation. The following will explore the legal ramifications of forging or altering a prescription in California, outlining the potential charges, penalties, and defenses.
Under California Business and Professions Code Section 4324 it is illegal to forge or alter a prescription, or possess drugs acquired through a false prescription. It is a crime in California to forge a prescription or make an attempt to gain possession of prescription drugs. However, in case a person actually got medication as a result of forging a prescription, he will be also liable under Business & Professions Code Section 4324(b). A person can be convicted of both offenses i.e. forging the prescription and obtaining the medication through false prescription.
The prosecution must prove the following elements to convict the defendant of forging or altering a prescription:
Prescription forgery is the use of a falsified prescription for purchasing drugs illegally. Forging or altering a prescription is making, publishing, uttering, passing, or attempting to pass a prescription for drugs or possessing drugs acquired by a false prescription. Attempting to transfer another person a falsified prescription, even if you didn’t actually write it, is also a crime.
Prescription is an instruction to provide drugs, either by phone, through writing, or through electronic communications (i.e., facsimile). Generally, a valid prescription must include the following information:
The term “drug” under California Business and Professions Code Section 4025 include:
The defendant is guilty of falsely uttering a prescription in situations where the defendant:
Some common defenses to charges related to forged prescriptions
Business and Professions Code section 4324 forging or altering a prescription is considered a "wobbler offense". As such, the offense can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the defendant’s criminal history, as well as other factors.
Penalties for misdemeanor Business and Professions Code 4324 conviction include:
Penalties for felony Business and Professions Code 4324 conviction include:
Furthermore, additional penalties a defendant can face include the following:
If you're facing charges for prescription fraud, it's crucial to have experienced legal representation. A skilled criminal defense attorney can:
At KAASS LAW, we understand the serious consequences of prescription fraud charges. Our attorneys dedicate to protecting your rights and fighting for the best possible outcome in your case. If you are under accusation with forging or altering prespeciptions, contact us today for a free consultation. We'll review your case, explain your legal options, and develop a strong defense strategy to protect your future. Moreover, any matters involving a wrongful death due to prescription drugs, please contact us today.
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uRUMZSCoLI[/embed]
California is an "at-will" employment state, meaning that employers generally have the right to terminate employees for any legal reason or even for no reason at all. However, there are important exceptions to this rule, and one of the most significant is the principle of "wrongful termination in violation of public policy." At KAASS LAW, we are dedicated to protecting the rights of employees and ensuring that they are not unjustly dismissed from their jobs. The following will explore the concept of wrongful termination in violation of public policy in California. Furthermore, we will be explaining the legal basis for such claims, common scenarios, and how we can help.
Wrongful termination in violation of public policy happens when an employer fires an employee for performing a legal obligation or exercising a legal right, and the obligation or right is related to important public policy. California law prohibits employers from firing their employees in case that discharge would be in violation of public policy. This is true even though California is an at-will employment state. To add, employers have the right to terminate employment relationships at any time without reason. Specifically, the employee can sue the employer for wrongful termination in case the employer has fired him for:
Unfortunately, accidents and incidents can be unavoidable sometimes. It can happen to any innocent man or woman and anywhere, during a working day or a holiday. You can appear into a slip and fall accident or in an automobile accident in the most unexpected moment and suffer either property damages or personal injuries. One of the common ways to get a compensation is settling a personal injury claim with an insurance company. Insurance companies exist to protect people from different kind of unpredictable and undesired coincidences. Here is a list of several insurance companies operating in Los Angeles: Kemper, Alliance, Farmers, State Farm, Mercury, Safeco, Infiniti, Allstate, Progressive, Esurance etc. Every insurance company has its own policies, procedures and different suggestions. You can file an insurance claim for various types of scenarios. It depends on the type of your insurance and on the policies and procedures. In most cases some documentation must be done, and the terms must be strictly kept. Filing a claim with an insurance company can be a tough and time-consuming process full of uncertainty and tricky procedures. firms’ attorneys are good professionals and experienced in such cases. They can be there to help and to provide you with deserved outcomes.
In California, when someone's conduct is particularly egregious, the court may award "punitive damages" on top of compensatory damages. These damages are not meant to compensate the victim for their losses but to punish the defendant and deter similar behavior in the future. At KAASS LAW, we have extensive experience handling cases involving punitive damages and understand the complexities of pursuing these claims. The following will explores the concept of punitive damages in California, explaining when they are awarded, how they are calculated, and the legal strategies involved in securing them.
Punitive damages are damages that a defendant in a civil action can be ordered to pay to punish him for egregious conducting including employment claims and personal injury. Commonly, punitive damages can’t be awarded for a simple breach of contract, but can be awarded in cases such as insurance company bad faith when the company unlawfully refuses to pay a legitimate claim. California Civil Code Section 3294 allows a jury to award punitive damages to the plaintiff in a personal injury case. The plaintiff must be able to establish convincing and clear evidence that the defendant's conduct amounted to oppression, malice or fraud.
Fraud against the government wastes taxpayer dollars and undermines essential public programs. The California False Claims Act (CFCA) is a powerful tool for combating fraud and holding accountable those who seek to defraud the state or local governments. At KAASS LAW, we commit to protecting the public interest and pursuing justice against those who engage in fraudulent activities. As a result, the following will navigate an overview of the CFCA. As a result, we will be explaining its key provisions, the types of fraud it covers, and how individuals can play a role in exposing fraud against the government. We strive for our readers and clients to stay informed!
The California False Claims Act (CFCA) is a law which provides civil penalties for business entities or individuals who commit certain forms of theft, embezzlement or fraud with respect to state or local government funds. CFCA allows a public entity to recover damages from any entity or person that knowingly presents a false claim for any payment or approval.
According to CACI 4800, the plaintiff must be able to prove all the following elements to establish the claim:
California has a robust legal framework in place to protect vulnerable adults, including seniors, from abuse, neglect, and exploitation of elder abuse. Elder abuse is a serious issue that affects thousands of Californians each year, and it often goes unreported due to fear, shame, or lack of awareness. At KAASS LAW, we are committed to protecting the rights and well-being of our elderly community members. The following will provide a comprehensive guide to understanding and reporting elder abuse in California, empowering you to take action and help safeguard those who may be unable to protect themselves.
Elder abuse is defined as any knowing, intentional, or negligent act by a caregiver or any other person that causes harm or serious risk of harm to an older adult. California law defines an older adult as anyone aged 65 or older
As consumers, we rely on businesses to provide goods and services that are safe, reliable, and most importantly, true. Unfortunately, this isn't always the case. Deceptive advertising, unfair pricing, and other unscrupulous business practices can leave consumers feeling cheated and frustrated. Fortunately, California law provides strong protections against these unfair practices through the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA). At KAASS LAW, we're dedicated to empowering consumers and holding businesses accountable for their actions. The following will explore the CLRA, explaining its purpose, prohibited practices, and how we can help you assert your rights as a consumer.
California Civil Code Section 1750, the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act declares several methods of competition and deceptive or unfair acts and practices undertaken by any person in a transaction intended to result or which results in the lease or sale of goods or services to any consumer. Unfair business practices covered under the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act include inserting fine print within rebate policies and selling used products under the label of "new."
The American workforce is the backbone of our nation's economy. With countless individuals contributing their skills and labor across various industries. While workplaces strive to maintain safe environments, accidents and injuries can still occur, sometimes due to employer negligence. For workers engaged in interstate commerce, a unique set of legal protections exists under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA). FELA provides a crucial legal avenue for workers who got an injury on the job due to their employer's negligence. At KAASS LAW, we champion the rights of workers and dedicate to ensuring they receive the compensation. The following will explore the key aspects of FELA, its purpose, scope, and how it can help injured workers seek recovery.
Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) is a U.S. federal law which has the aim to protect and compensate workers injured on the job, in case the worker is able to establish that it was at least partially negligent in causing him and injury.
According to CACI 2900, in case the plaintiff claims that while he was employed by the defendant, he was harmed by his negligence he must be able to prove all the following elements to establish the claim:
This post contains some basic information about skateboard product liability in California and the laws involved with riding skateboards. Skateboard laws are a general regulation for the locals and can change at any time so please make sure to consult with a professional near you for the most recent updates. Many US states enacted legislation that limits the liability of government entities and their employees for skateboard injuries. Recently, skateboarding in California was classified as a “hazardous recreational activity,” and as a result, it is more difficult to win lawsuits against the government for injuries suffered on public property.
In California, local authorities have the ability to adopt their own skateboarding laws. According to California Vehicle Code Section, 21212, skateboarders under the age of 18 must wear federally approved helmets. Riders 18 years old and older are allowed to ride without wearing helmets, though this can result in comparative fault for injuries in a case. In most cities, it is legal for skateboarders to ride on the bikeways, streets, and public bicycle paths as long as they avoid business districts and ride non-motorized skateboards.
According to CACI 2430, the plaintiff must be able to establish the following elements to prove the claim of wrongful termination in violation of a public policy.
One important thing the plaintiff must prove is that there is a clear causal connection between his termination and the employer's public policy violation.
The most common lawsuits over wrongful discharge in violation of public policy involve situations when employees are terminated for reporting illegal conduct that the employer has engaged in. This protected by law activity is called "whistleblowing." Federal laws protect employees who speak up about the employer who violates the law. By witnessing the questionable behavior of the employer, whistleblowing employees have immunity against termination and retaliation after reporting the employer to law enforcement. Employees have a right to sue the employer in case they are terminated because of whistleblowing. Here are some federal and California laws that provide support for employees who want to protect their rights after being fired for whistleblower activities. These include:
An employee wrongfully terminated in violation of public policy may recover the following damages:
In most cases, the deadline for filing a lawsuit against the employer for wrongful termination in violation of public policy in California is two years from the date of the termination. However, responses to certain kinds of illegal termination have shorter deadlines for filing a complaint or suit. For example, if the employment relationship is terminated in retaliation for complaining about harassment or discrimination at the workplace, the plaintiff must file a complaint within one year.
Wrongful termination cases can be complex and challenging, requiring a thorough understanding of employment law. Gathering evidence isn't easy. At KAASS LAW, we have extensive experience representing employees who are victims of wrongful termination. We can help you:
If you believe you've been wrongfully terminated, don't hesitate to contact KAASS LAW for a consultation. We'll listen to your story, answer your questions, and explain your legal options. We're dedicated to helping employees fight back against unlawful termination and protect their livelihoods. Additionally, if you believe you're a victim of wrongful termination, post work injury, give us a call! [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4w4KPq605d0[/embed]
You should carefully read your insurance contract in order to reveal who can apply for compensation and who can be compensated. There are different insurance packages. You can have an Insurance that only covers your personal injuries, or your family member’s injuries can be included under the coverage too. That’s why it is very important to carefully examine the contract. You can can file a claim with your insurance company either personally or via law firms and/or attorneys. As was mentioned above, claiming procedure may include several terms and conditions in addition to plenty of documentation. It is important to know, that you need to introduce the accurate calculation of the financial losses caused by the accident. While there are some punitive damages that you could calculate yourself, such as lost wages and current medical charges, there are others that you may find practically impossible without the help of an attorney. These include the value of your pain and suffering, in addition to lost capacity of making money. Once you have dealt with all the medical affairs that may arise out of such an undesirable event, you may need to operate a personal injury claim with an insurance company to receive compensation for such injuries.
Insurance companies aim to help their insureds in the times of trouble, but like any business, they are trying to lessen your costs and expenses under their coverage to compensate less. It means they can save markedly in the amounts they have to pay to the insured. In these cases, dealing with insurance companies may even become confusing to a lawyer, let alone to a person without any legal discipline at all. The personal injury lawyers must know the rules, too. They must understand the guidelines and the terms. Additionally; these will include different filing procedures for claims against insurance companies. KAASS Law firm’s personal injury lawyers are experienced in such cases and they can assist you. They can help in the validity of the potential claim. They can ensure that the time limit, in your case, is met and the necessary documentation is done. This paperwork plays a huge role in such kind of processes and is a mandatory part of success.
California Civil Code Section 3294(c) gives the following definition to “malice,” “oppression” and “fraud”:
When dealing with a company as opposed to a private person, California Civil Code section 3294 states that the employer shouldn’t be legally liable for punitive damages, based upon acts of his employee, unless the employer had reasonable knowledge of the unfitness of the employee and hired him with a conscious disregard of the rights or safety of other people or ratified or authorized the illegal conduct for which the damages are awarded, or was personally guilty of fraud, oppression, or malice. With respect to a corporate employer, the reasonable knowledge and conscious disregard, ratification, authorization, or act of oppression, malice or fraud must be on the part of the director, officer, or managing agent of the corporation.
Some common scenarios include the following:
According to CACI 3940 the jury considers several factors when deciding the amount of punitive damages. Here are some of them:
Pursuing punitive damages requires careful legal strategy and thorough preparation. KAASS LAW can help you:
If you believe you may have a claim for punitive damages, contact KAASS LAW today for a free consultation. We have the experience and expertise to help you navigate the complexities of these claims and fight for the justice you deserve. We understand that pursuing a legal claim can be a daunting process, especially when you're dealing with the aftermath of a wrongful act. Our team is dedicated to providing compassionate and dedicated legal representation, guiding you through every step of the process and advocating for your rights.
Here is the list of some actions which constitute a violation of CFCA
For purposes of CFCA, a "claim" means a request for money, services, or property that will be provided directly or indirectly by the California state government or a local government.
With respect to information about the claim, "knowingly "means that:
To establish the claim, the plaintiff doesn't have to prove the specific intent of defrauding. "Material" means that the claim had a tendency to influence, or was capable of influencing, the payment or receipt of money, services, or property on the claim.
The CFCA imposes an additional legal responsibility for reporting false claims if a person has inadvertently received a benefit from a false claim, such as an accidental overpayment that goes unreported.
In case the defendant is found guilty in violation of the California False Claims Act, they will have to pay:
Under certain circumstances, such as self-reporting within 30 days or full cooperation, the penalties may have a reduction.
Under California law, the CFCA must be before the later of the following dates:
The CFCA allows private citizens to file qui tam lawsuits on behalf of the government to expose fraud. Also, in qui tam lawsuit, the relator, or whistleblower, brings the action on behalf of the government and shares in any recovery. The qui tam provisions of the CFCA:
Filing a qui tam lawsuit under the CFCA is a complex process that requires careful consideration and legal expertise. Additionally, lawsuit must be filed under a seal to allow the government time to investigate the allegations. The relator must provide the government with all evidence and information they have about the alleged fraud.
Fraud against the government wastes taxpayer dollars and undermines essential public services. As a result, the CFCA empowers individuals to play a crucial role in exposing fraud and holding accountable those who seek to defraud the government. We can guide you through understanding your rights and options under the CFCA, helping you take the necessary steps to protect the public interest. Also, If you're looking to file a claim against the California Government, we’re ready to assist you! Contact KAASS LAW today if you're seeking legal advice or consultation.
A person must make a report as soon as possible by telephone, followed by a written report or Internet report through the confidential Internet reporting tool within two working days.
In case of physical abuse, and it has occurred in a long-term care facility, a person must make a to both law enforcement and the ombudsmen.
In case of serious bodily injury, the reporter must contact law enforcement within two hours and make a report to the ombudsmen within twenty-four hours.
The mandatory reporter has twenty-four hours to contact the ombudsman and law enforcement in case of less than serious bodily injury.
Elder abuse can take many forms, including:
Under California law, a mandatory reporter cannot be held civilly or criminally liable for a report of elder abuse made in good faith. Moreover, mandatory reporters do not have any legal duty to investigate the report of elder abuse. They are only obliged to make that report.
The mandatory reporter who fails to report physical abuse, financial abuse, abandonment, isolation, abduction, or neglect of an elder will face:
The mandatory reporter who physical abuse, financial abuse, abandonment, isolation, abduction, or neglect where that abuse caused great bodily injury or death of an elder will face:
In case the officer or an employee of a financial institution fails to report financial abuse, he will face
Recognizing the signs of elder abuse is crucial for intervention and prevention. Some common signs include:
California law designates certain professionals as "mandated reporters," requiring them to report suspected elder abuse. Mandated reporters include:
If you suspect elder abuse, it's crucial to report it immediately. Here's how:
Once a report is made, APS or law enforcement will investigate the situation. This may involve interviewing the elder, the alleged abuser, and other witnesses. If the investigation finds evidence of abuse, APS or law enforcement will take steps to protect the elder and may pursue legal action against the abuser.
California law protects individuals who report elder abuse in good faith from civil or criminal liability. This means that you cannot be sued or prosecuted for reporting suspected abuse, even if the investigation does not find evidence of abuse.
At KAASS LAW, we are dedicated to protecting the rights and well-being of older adults. If you suspect elder abuse, we can help you understand your reporting obligations, navigate the legal process, and advocate for the protection of the elder. We can also provide legal representation to elders who have been victims of abuse, neglect, or exploitation. Elder abuse is a serious issue, but it often goes unreported. Your report could make a significant difference in the life of a vulnerable elder. Contact KAASS LAW today for consultation. We're here to help you protect our elders. Additionally, if your family suffered from elderly wrongful death by a caregiver, we can help represent and help your loved ones.
According to CACI 4700, to establish this claim, the plaintiff must be able to prove all of the following:
The plaintiff's harm resulted from the defendant's conduct in case he relied on the defendant's representation. In order to prove reliance, the plaintiff must only prove that the representation was a substantial factor in his decision. In case the defendant's representation of fact was material, reliance can be inferred. A fact is considered material when a reasonable consumer would consider it important in deciding whether to buy or lease the service or good.
California Consumer Legal Remedies Act covers a broad range of unfair business practices, with twenty-four specific unscrupulous acts mentioned within the consumer protection law. Here are the most common business practices covered under CLRA statutes:
CLRA doesn't generally permit plaintiffs to receive monetary awards, but instead, gives them a legal right to seek punitive damages, as well as the restitution of services and property. Defendants can't recover attorney fees and in usually they pay the fees charged by plaintiff attorneys. According to California Civil Code Section 1780(a), consumers injured by unfair or deceptive practices can be entitled to recover:
In case a senior or disabled plaintiff suffers substantial emotional, physical, or economic damage as a result of the defendant's conduct, the plaintiff may be awarded additional damages of up to $5,000. The plaintiff will not award damages in case the defendant:
Navigating a CLRA claim can be complex, especially when dealing with large corporations or sophisticated businesses. KAASS LAW has extensive experience representing consumers in CLRA cases. We can help you:
The CLRA provides strong protections for consumers against unfair and deceptive business practices. If you believe you are a victim of harm from a business that has violated the CLRA, don't hesitate to contact KAASS LAW. We're here to help you fight back and protect your rights as a consumer.
To prove that a breached its duty the plaintiff must prove the circumstances which a reasonable person would foresee as creating a potential for harm and that this breach played any part, even the slightest, in producing the injury or harm to the plaintiff.
FELA's protection extends to a wide range of workers who are in interstate commerce. This includes employees who:
Workers must file a claim under FELA within a three-year period. In case the worker fails to initiate the claim before the mentioned deadline, there will be a case dismissal under federal law.
FELA allows injured workers to get full compensation for caused damages. This is one of the main differences between standard workers’ compensation claims and FELA claims. Workers are not at limit to seeking compensation for a part of lost wages and medical benefits. Workers with an injury have the right to compensate for their noneconomic losses, including pain and suffering. Federal Employers Liability Act covers injuries due to asbestos exposure, as well as cumulative trauma injuries and repetitive stress.
FELA cases can be complex and challenging, often involving intricate legal arguments and extensive evidence. At KAASS LAW, our attorneys have a deep understanding of FELA.
We can help you:
If you're a worker with an injured on the job and believe your employer's negligence, give us a call. We'll listen to your story, answer your questions, and explain your legal options under FELA. We dedicate in helping workers to get the justice and compensation they deserve.
Additionally, FELA cases have played an important role in establishing the precedent for many tort law issues. For instance, such as damages allocation and standards for employee safety and working conditions. Are you in need of additional information? Our employme nt law attorney at KAASS LAW would be happy to help. Get in touch with us now at (310) 943-1171 now!
There are the following rules to operate an electric skateboard in California:
There are three basic types of skateboard product liability claims:
Design defect creates a predictable risk of harm which could have been reduced or avoided by another reasonable design. In California law, a product is considered defectively designed if it fails the “consumer expectation test.” This means that the product must be as safe as a consumer would expect it to be when using it reasonably. Another way of having a product fall into it being a defect is when the product's harm outweighs its design in the first place.
Manufacturing defect takes place when a product departs from its intended design, even though all possible care could have been taken in the product’s manufacture and promotion.
In California, a person injured by a defective product has a right to sue anyone in the chain of production and supply, from the manufacturer through the retailer. A wholesaler or distributor can also be at risk regardless of his actual responsibility for the product’s defect. Thus, skateboard retailers and manufacturers can all be responsible for defective skateboards.
Would you like to file a product liability lawsuit in California? Our product liability lawyers at KAASS Law can look into your situation, and provide you with a free consultation. Get in touch with us now at 310-943-1171.
California law doesn’t directly require a person who wants to use an electronic scooter to purchase insurance. Though, since in California, all electric scooter operators must have a valid driver’s license, and drivers’ licenses require auto insurance, then an e-scooter user will likely have an auto insurance policy. It is worth mentioning that California does not require registration, plate display, or insurance for privately owned electric scooters.
In case an electric scooter operator unlawfully crosses an intersection or mounts and causes injures to a cyclist, pedestrian, or anyone else, the scooter operator can face liability for the incident and inappropriate use of an electric scooter.
An injured electronic scooter rider can be eligible for damage recovery in case he can establish that someone else’s negligence caused or contributed to the accident. This burden of proof takes establishing:
If a person rents an electric scooter from a rideshare service, the company can be legally responsible for any injuries. In case the company fails to properly service a defective or damaged e-scooter or didn’t give proper instructions for use or safety warnings, it can face liability for an injured scooter operator’s damages. If an e-scooter manufacturer released an unreasonably defective or dangerous device that caused injuries to a person, the injured consumer can bring a product liability claim against the manufacturer. In case a vehicle driver negligently hits an electric scooter then the case follows a standard framework to other personal injury claims. [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fl-Gw4mXHE[/embed] Have you been hurt due to a defective electric scooter or a rideshare company’s negligence? If so, we invite you to contact our experienced product liability lawyers in Los Angeles to discuss the details of your situation. Our dedicated attorneys will do everything in our power to help you out!