Stay updated with the latest legal news, expert analysis, and firm updates from KAASS LAW.
Whether you're facing a legal challenge or seeking proactive counsel, our award-winning team is ready to defend your interests.
In California, a government entity can be liable for negligent or intentional acts of its employees committed by a private individual or company. In case a person has injuries as a result of some governmental action, there are some certain rules he must follow to successfully establish his legal rights.
The government entity or agency that is responsible for the employee, property, or carrying out a duty in a California Tort Claims Act suit is usually the government entity or agency that is responsible for the employee, property, or carrying out a duty. The CTCA covers state, county, and local government agencies and departments, as well as city and municipal government agencies.
According to California law, there are very strict deadlines to sue the government. A person must file a claim within six months of the date of his injury if he intends to sue a governmental entity or agency in California. In case the claim is not filed within the six-month period, it will be barred by law. This rule is also applicable to minors. Though in some certain limited cases a person can obtain relief from the court to file a claim within 1 year after the injury.
The damage victim must send notice of his or her claim to the State of California, a county government, or a municipal government agency in order to file a claim against them. 6 This could include submitting a report or sending a letter that serves as notice if it meets all of the relevant criteria. Many agencies and towns, on the other hand, provide claim forms that individuals can fill out to notify them of a claim.
Government claims in California must include the following:
If you don't submit all of the information that is a requirement, they may reject your claim. Other reason could be if you didn't file a claim within the time limits.
You have two options for resolving your federal government dispute. First, you'll have the opportunity to negotiate an out-of-court settlement with the government attorney assigned to your case during the administrative claim procedure. If you file a case in federal court, you'll get a second chance to bargain with a new team of lawyers from the Department of Justice. A claimant is entitled to recover damages against the government in the same manner as he would be allowed to recover against a private company, including:
There are two major exceptions in recovering damages in a case against the government:
If you have been injured as a result of governmental negligence, then you may be entitled to compensation. If that is the case, contact our Glendale lawyer today for a consultation and case review. This type of lawsuit is an extremely complex legal process. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
When we seek medical care, we place our trust in healthcare professionals to provide competent and safe treatment. Unfortunately, medical errors can and do occur, sometimes with devastating consequences. California law provides a framework for holding healthcare providers accountable for negligence that results in harm to patients. The following will explore California's medical malpractice laws. Additionally, we will be explaining the elements of a claim, the challenges, and how KAASS Law can help. As each state, California also has its own set of medical malpractice laws, and it is important for patients to understand them and know how they can affect his case.
According to California law, an injured party must file his lawsuit within:
From a practical perspective, a claimant has only one year from the date of the medical treatment to bring an action on the case. There is an exception for children under 6-year-old whose parents or guardians have 3 years after the date of the injury to file a medical negligence lawsuit.
California has a growing senior population, and unfortunately, with that comes an increase in financial elder abuse and fraud targeting vulnerable older adults. At KAASS LAW, we are dedicated to protecting the rights and well-being of seniors. The following will explore the issue of financial elder abuse and fraud in California, providing information on how to recognize, prevent, and address this growing problem.
Financial elder abuse or senior fraud can take different forms and can be committed by caregivers, family members, strangers, or any other people known to the elder. Financial abuse may have the same impact as physical abuse.
According to CACI 3100, in case the plaintiff claims that the defendant violated the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act by taking financial advantage of him, he must prove the following elements to establish this claim:
Calling off work due to getting sick is the worst. As a result, you lose days of wages and puts financial pressure for a lot of hard workers. The COVID-19 pandemic brought unpredicting challenges to workplaces and individuals across California. Employees faced illness, quarantine requirements, and caregiving responsibilities, often leading to lost wages and financial strain. Fortunately, California's Short-Term Disability Insurance (SDI) program provides crucial financial support to eligible workers who need time off work due to COVID-19. At KAASS LAW, we understand the complexities of navigating SDI benefits and are dedicated to helping individuals access the support they need during challenging times. The following provides comprehensive information about California SDI benefits for COVID-19, including eligibility requirements, benefit amounts, and how to apply.
The short-term disability (SDI) insurance program provides short-term benefit payments to employees who are off work due to a non-work-related injury or illness. State of California has announced numerous changes in SDI rules in response to the COVID-19 outbreak.
To receive short-term disability benefits in California, a person is required to meet the following requirements:
The Fair Employment and Housing Act provides protection to employees from illegal employment practices. Employers are subject to the Fair Employment and Housing Act in case they have five or more employees. Under FEHA, an employer is prohibited from taking adverse action against his employee based on discrimination or retaliation. The Fair Employment and Housing Act also provides protection to employees from harassment, failing to take necessary steps to prevent harassment and discrimination, and failing to provide reasonable accommodations for pregnancy or mental or physical disability.
Workplace harassment and discrimination can be in different forms, including cases of:
Like residential and other commercial property owners, hotel owners have a duty of reasonable care and keep the property in a safe condition by discovering unsafe conditions and replacing, repairing, or giving adequate warning of a dangerous condition that can cause injury or harm to someone.
According to CACI 1001, hotel owners are legally responsible for dangerous and unsafe conditions that they either knew about or should have reasonably known. According to California law hotel owners are particularly required:
Hotel owners are also liable for the acts of their employees who are acting within the course and scope of their employment in case they create a dangerous or unsafe condition that can cause injury to someone. the hotel owner is presumed to have notice of that condition, by law. Hotels aren’t legally liable for injuries caused by unforeseeable events. A hotel can be responsible for failing to protect the visitors and guests from criminal acts in case it fails to provide chain locks, deadbolt locks, peepholes indoors, and other security devices to avoid contact with criminals.
Electricity powers our modern world, but it also poses significant dangers. Electrocution and electric shock accidents can cause devastating injuries, including burns, nerve damage, cardiac arrest, and even death. At KAASS Law, we understand the profound impact these accidents can have on individuals and their families. We commit to helping victims of electrocution and electric shock accidents seek justice and obtain the compensation they deserve. The following will explore the causes and consequences of these accidents, highlighting your legal rights and how we can help you navigate the complex legal process.
Electric shock injury happens when a person’s body becomes part of an electric circuit, the electricity flows between parts of the body or through the body to the ground. Symptoms of an electric shock injury depend on the current’s frequency, the path through the body, the amount of current flowing through the body, and the length of time the body remains in the circuit.
Injuries resulting from electrocution and electrical shocks include the following:
In California, people who own dogs can be held strictly liable for the harm from a dog bite, no matter how carefully they restrain or guard their dogs. California Civil Code Section 3342 is the dog bite statute, which outlines when dog owners can be held responsible for injuries caused by their dog.
According to CACI 463, in case the plaintiff claims that the defendant’s dog bit him and that the defendant is responsible for the harm, he must be able to prove all of the following elements to establish the claim:
Under strict liability, an individual is liable for his conduct, even if he was not acting negligently. Generally, to prove the claim the victims are required to show that the defendant’s conduct was negligent. However, under strict liability, the victims do not have to prove the defendant’s negligence. Factors the court considers regarding dog bite include:
The whole world is suffering nowadays because of the Coronavirus (COVID-19). The United States, like numerous other countries, is on national lockdown. The lockdown affected everyone either directly or indirectly. Both small and large businesses have suffered as a result. Free movement has limits after Los Angeles Mayor’s “stay-at-home” order. This leads to a chaotic environment for numerous businesses. It can be especially crucial for small businesses. Several businesses can not operate at all. It is very important now to provide especially the small and essential businesses with assistance and with new stimulus to overcome this situation. The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented disruptions to businesses and individuals across the globe. Government-imposed "stay-at-home" orders, while necessary to curb the spread of the virus, caused significant financial hardship for many. If your business suffered losses due to these mandatory closures or restrictions, you might have a claim to compensation. At KAASS Law, we commit to helping you explore available avenues for recovery. The following is our attempt to help navigate information about seeking coverage for losses related to COVID-19 "stay-at-home" orders. Any kind of business assistance is worth it now. Additionally, still, several ways may reveal to seek coverage from your insurance for harm caused to your business due to the lockdown.
Stairways, a seemingly mundane part of our everyday lives, can pose significant hazards if not properly constructed or maintained. A simple misstep on a faulty staircase can lead to devastating injuries, including broken bones, spinal cord injuries, and traumatic brain injuries. In California, property owners have a legal responsibility to ensure the safety of their premises, including stairways. If you've been injured in a stairway accident, understanding your rights and the complexities of premises liability law is crucial. At KAASS Law, we are committed to helping victims of stairway accidents seek justice and obtain the compensation they deserve.
Here are some specific reasons that most stairway falls occur:
California law also requires the plaintiff to notify the defendant 90 days before filing a medical malpractice lawsuit. The plaintiff must send the following information to the defendant:
In California, an injured plaintiff is not required to file a certificate or affidavit of merit to verify the validity of a medical negligence case. However, expert testimony is always required in medical malpractice cases to establish the standards of care to which medical specialists are held in the precise area of the medical healing arts which is in question and to decide whether the defendant who has acted negligently and failed to live up to the standards.
Statutory caps include limits or restrictions on the amount of the damages the plaintiff can recover in a medical malpractice lawsuit. In the state of California, a plaintiff can’t recover more than $250,000 for non-economic damages such as:
It is important to mention that this cap has no bearing on "economic" losses such as:
California also limits the amount of money that an attorney can charge based on a sliding scale which is a function of the total damages award that the plaintiff can collect.
California is a pure comparative negligence state, in which the fault is proportionally allocated among all parties and the damage awards are reduced proportionally.
Navigating a medical malpractice claim can be overwhelming, especially when you're dealing with the physical and emotional effects of an injury. KAASS Law has extensive experience representing clients in medical malpractice cases. We can help you:
If you or a loved one has been injured due to medical negligence, don't suffer in silence. Contact KAASS Law today for a free consultation. We'll listen to your story, answer your questions, and explain your legal options. We're here to help you navigate the complexities of medical malpractice law and seek the compensation you deserve.
[video width="1280" height="720" mp4="https://kaass.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/output_HD7206-1.mp4"][/video] If you have suffered a medical malpractice injury, we invite yo to contact our experienced lawyers at KAASS LAW who are familiar with the details and procedures involved with filing a medical malpractice claim in California. If you are serious about the situation, you must act before the statute of limitations is up.
The plaintiff can establish the defendant's illegal conduct by proving that he knew or should have reasonably known that his actions were likely to be harmful to the plaintiff. Such as, the defendant took, hid, appropriated, obtained, or retained the property in case the plaintiff was deprived of the property by an agreement, will, gift, or trust, regardless of whether the property was held by the plaintiff or by his representative. A representative is an individual or an entity, or that is either:
A false misrepresentation lawyer can take a look into your situation for you if you feel as though you need legal assistance.
According to California Civil Code Section 1575, undue influence is a misuse of a person's power and role to exploit the dependency, trust, or fear of another person in order to misleadingly gain control over that person's decision-making and obtaining an unfair advantage over him/her.
Recognizing the signs of financial elder abuse is crucial for intervention and protection. Some red flags include:
There are several steps you can take to protect yourself or your loved ones from financial elder abuse:
According to California Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15657.7 for financial elder abuse claims, the statute of limitations is four years. The statute of limitation beings to run from the time the plaintiff discovers the facts, constituting financial abuse, or when the abuse should have been discovered with reasonable diligence.
Civil remedies for elder financial abuse include:
At KAASS LAW, we commit to protecting the rights and well-being of seniors. If you or a loved one has been a victim of financial elder abuse or fraud, contact us today. We can help you understand your legal options and fight for the justice you deserve.
If you believe that you or someone you know have been a victim of elder financial abuse, we invite you to contact our Glendale elder financial abuse attorneys at (310) 943-1171, for a free consultation.
According to California law, a person is eligible for short-term disability payments in case he is incapable to work due to having coronavirus or being exposed to the novel coronavirus.
In case an employee already has a coronavirus, he must submit a medical certification signed by either by a doctor or public health officer, which must contain the following information:
In case an employee is quarantined due to COVID-19 exposure or potential exposure, he must be able to qualify for a short-term disability benefit if his quarantine is certified by a doctor or public health officer.
An employee can be able to collect short-term disability benefits in case he was laid off and searching for work at the time he became unable to work due to coronavirus or coronavirus exposure. Though in this case a person can’t collect unemployment benefits and SDI at the same time.
California has waived the seven-day waiting period for collecting benefits and an eligible employee can start to receive SDI benefits for the first day off work.
You can apply for SDI benefits online through the EDD website or by mail. When applying, you will need to provide:
Applying for and receiving SDI benefits can be a complex process, especially during the challenges of a pandemic. At KAASS Law, we are dedicated to helping individuals understand their rights and navigate the SDI system. If you have questions about SDI benefits for COVID-19 or need assistance with your claim, contact us today for a free consultation. We can help you:
If you're facing the challenges of COVID-19 and need financial or legal help, don't hesitate to seek legal assistance. KAASS Law is here to help you access the SDI benefits you deserve and protect your rights as a California worker.
Get in touch with our legal professionals at KAASS LAW for more information. [contact-form-7 id="5673" title="KAASS LAW Contact Form"]
In case there is proof that the employer failed to take the required steps to protect his employee from discrimination or harassment at the workplace, the employee may have been eligible to take legal action against his employer.
To bring a claim against the employer a plaintiff must establish the following elements:
Protected activity can include the following:
It is illegal for an employer to terminate his employee who threatened to file a charge of employment discrimination against him.
Adverse employment action according to the Fair Employment and Housing Act is an action that materially affects the conditions, terms, or privileges of employment.
An employee must file the discrimination claims within the Department of Fair Employment and Housing within 1 year from the date of the discrimination.
Filing a complaint with the DFEH is required before the employee can file a lawsuit pursuant to the Fair Employment and Housing Act. An online form to file a complaint against an employer can be found on the DFEH website.
When a plaintiff files a complaint with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing, he/she can either:
Thus, an employee is only eligible to file a lawsuit over the Fair Employment and Housing Act retaliation or discrimination after getting a "right to sue" notice from the Department of Fair Employment and Housing.
Are you in need of legal assistance from an attorney who specializes in employment law? Contact our Los Angeles employment law attorney at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation. [contact-form][contact-field label="Name" type="name" required="true" /][contact-field label="Email" type="email" required="true" /][contact-field label="Website" type="url" /][contact-field label="Message" type="textarea" /][/contact-form]
Common causes of hotel injuries include the following:
To establish the hotel owner’s negligence in a premises liability claim, the plaintiff must be able to prove the following elements:
In California, a victim has two years to file a premises liability lawsuit against the hotel.
If you or a loved one has been injured in a hotel accident, we invite you to contact our Glendale personal injury attorney at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation.
Electric shock and electrocution accidents often occur in the workplace. Most electrical accidents result from unsafe equipment or installation, unsafe work practices, or an unsafe environment. Here is the list of workplaces in the United States with the highest rates of electrical accidents and electrocution rates:
When an electric shock and electrocution accidents injury happens in the workplace, the claim is usually covers workers' compensation, which provides lost income payments and medical care to the injured persons. Mostly work injuries in the workplace don't need to prove the employer's fault to get workers' compensation.
Usually, electric shock accident claims are based on negligence and to recover damages after an accident, the plaintiff must be able to establish the following elements:
When an electrical shock happens on another person's property, the property owner can be liable for dangerous conditions which existed on that property. In a premises liability personal injury lawsuit, the plaintiff must be able to prove the following elements:
Determining liability in electrocution and electric shock accidents can be complex. Potential liable parties may include:
Damages a person may be entitled to for an electrocution injury are the following:
KAASS Law: Fighting for Justice in Electrocution and Electric Shock Cases
At KAASS Law, we have a proven track record of success in representing victims of electrocution and electric shock accidents. We can help you:
Don't Face This Alone
Electrocution and electric shock accidents can have devastating consequences. If you or a loved one has been injured in such an accident, don't hesitate to contact KAASS Law. We are dedicated to protecting your rights and fighting for the justice you deserve.
For a free consultation with experienced lawyers from KAASS LAW with proven results, call us at (310) 943-1171.
California’s statute imposes strict liability only on the dog’s owner. However, under the statute, other persons, such as a keeper or handler, can also be deemed an “owner.” They can also be responsible for a victim’s injuries, but not under the strict liability statute. To be found guilty, a handler or a keeper must have prior knowledge of the dog’s aggressive acts, such as a prior bite.
When a person enters the property of another one he has a reasonable expectation that he won’t be injured or hurt. A property owner of the property or the occupier owes a due of care to third parties. Thus, it is the owner’s obligation to maintain a safe environment for all individuals entering his premises. This includes keeping potentially dangerous animals away from people or put up warning signs.
Some exceptions to California Civil Code Section 3342 include:
In California, the statute of limitations for a dog bite is two years from the time of the incident.
Are you a victim of a dog bite in California? Our experienced dog bite lawyers at KAASS Law may be able to provide you with the legal assistance that you need. We invite you to contact our office at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation.
Business interruption insurance is designed to help businesses recover financial losses incurred due to unexpected events that disrupt normal operations. This coverage typically includes:
Many businesses faced challenges when filing business interruption claims related to COVID-19. Insurance companies often denied claims, arguing that the pandemic did not cause "physical damage" to property, which is a typical requirement for coverage. However, several legal challenges and court rulings have provided some hope for businesses seeking coverage.
Different types of insurances exist to secure your business from undesired consequences. And each of them has its own policies, which define when, how, in which terms the insured can claim and get coverage. Many entrepreneurs prefer to pay more for insurances, to be premium members, and to be on the safe side, but some of them choose cheaper insurances, without any additional coverage only for the riskiest scenarios. To figure out whether you can claim coverage from your insurance you should read very carefully the policy defined for your insurance. In the policy, you may meet the point that provides you with the lawful right to claim for your coverage. Sometimes it can be very difficult for a non-lawyer to discover that very point in the whole policy and it is important to consult with an attorney experienced in cases related to Insurances.
If you found out that your insurance contains the point that covers the present scene and you strongly believe that there exists the lawful right to claim for coverage, you should figure out now who has the liability to claim. By default, it will be the business owner on behalf of his or her own business. There may be a possibility also for landlords, who are forced to deal with unpaid rent and other related issues stemming from their tenants’ cessation of use with respect to the Insured Premises.
The nowadays situation is very unusual, it may even become confusing to a lawyer, let alone to a person without any legal discipline at all.
The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented disruptions to businesses and individuals across the globe. Government-imposed "stay-at-home" orders, while necessary to curb the spread of the virus, caused significant financial hardship for many. If your business suffered losses due to these mandatory closures or restrictions, you might be entitled to compensation. At KAASS Law, we understand the challenges businesses have faced and are committed to helping you explore available avenues for recovery. The State of California also has a guidance and resources available to look into alternative solutions. KAASS Law firm’s lawyers are experienced in cases related to insurances and they can provide you with Coronavirus (COVID-19) legal help. They can help in the validity of the potential claim. They can ensure that the time limit, in your case, is met. Also, to produce the imperative paperwork available. This paperwork plays a huge role in such kinds of processes and is a mandatory part of compliance rules.
Falling on a stairwell can result in serious injuries or even death to the person. California has a number of safety code regulations concerning staircases. Common safety regulations include:
To prove the property owner’s fault the plaintiff must be able to establish the following:
The court also takes into consideration whether the plaintiff had a reasonable purpose for being on the stairs, was acting recklessly and his carelessness contributed to the accident.
California law operates under the principle of "premises liability," which holds property owners and occupiers accountable for maintaining safe conditions for visitors on their property. This includes:
California follows a "pure comparative negligence" rule. This means that even if you were partially at fault for the accident, you can still recover damages. However, your compensation will be reduced in proportion to your degree of fault. For instance, if you are found 20% at fault, your damages will be reduced by 20%.
In California, you generally have two years from the date of the accident to file a personal injury lawsuit for a stairway accident. It's crucial to act promptly to avoid losing your right to seek compensation.
Stairway accident cases can be complex. Proving negligence and navigating insurance claims requires legal expertise. An experienced personal injury attorney can help you:
If you've been injured in a stairway accident in California, don't hesitate to seek legal help. Understanding your rights and taking the right steps after an accident can make a significant difference in your ability to recover compensation and get back on your feet.
If you or a loved one has been injured in a stairway accident, we invite you to contact our Glendale personal injury attorney at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation. [contact-form-7 id="5673" title="KAASS LAW Contact Form"]