Stay updated with the latest legal news, expert analysis, and firm updates from KAASS LAW.
Whether you're facing a legal challenge or seeking proactive counsel, our award-winning team is ready to defend your interests.
In today’s interconnected world, where communication and commerce often rely heavily on mail and electronic transmissions, the potential for fraud has unfortunately increased. Mail and wire fraud, federal offenses that target schemes using the postal service or electronic communication, can have devastating consequences for both individuals and businesses. These crimes often involve complex financial transactions, deceptive tactics, and the exploitation of trust. The federal government takes these offenses seriously. Additionally, they dedicate in significant resources to investigating and prosecuting those accused of mail and wire fraud. A conviction can lead to substantial prison sentences, hefty fines, and a criminal record that can severely impact your future. Understanding the nuances of these laws, the potential defenses available, and the importance of experienced legal counsel is crucial if you are facing accusations of mail or wire fraud. At KAASS LAW, we dedicate to providing comprehensive and aggressive legal representation to individuals and businesses facing these complex charges. The following will aim to shed light on the intricacies of mail and wire fraud, offering insights into the legal definitions, potential penalties, and the critical role of a skilled defense attorney.
According to 18 USC Section 1341 it is illegal to devise or intend to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining property or money by means of fraudulent or false pretenses, promises or representations, or to sell, loan, dispose of, alter, exchange, give away, distribute, supply for unlawful use any counterfeit or spurious coin, obligation, security, or other article, or the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, or deposits or causes to be deposited any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier, or take or receive therefrom, any such matter or thing, or knowingly cause to be delivered by mail or such carrier according to the direction thereon, or at the place at which it is directed to be delivered by the person to whom it is addressed, any such matter or thing.
According to 18 USC Section 1343, it is illegal to devise or intend to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, for obtaining property or money by means of fraudulent or false pretenses, promises, or representations, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, television, radio, or communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, pictures, signals, or sounds for the purpose of executing such artifice or scheme.
Mail and wire fraud statutes are basically the same, except for the medium associated with the offense. The wire communication in the case of wire fraud and mail in the case of mail fraud and. The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the following elements to convict the defendant of mail fraud:
For the purposes of these statutes, wire communication means receiving, transmitting or causing something to be received or transmitted through television or radio signal, an interstate electronic or telephone communication in furtherance of the scheme
18 USC Section 1343, defines the use of mail communications as the following:
Both mail and wire fraud statutes prohibit any scheme or artifice to obtain or defraud property or money by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, promises, representations, or deprive another person’s right to honest services by such means.
The defendant must have an intent to defraud which is a willful act with the specific intent to cheat or deceive, typically for the purpose of causing financial loss to another person or getting financial gain. Misconduct that constitutes mail or wire fraud may also constitute a violation of other federal crimes. Among these are frauds based on jurisdictional factors other than the use of mail or wire communication, predicate offense crimes, and other honest services frauds in the form of kickbacks or bribery.
In case the fraud targeted any benefit related to a presidentially declared emergency or disaster or affected a financial institution, the defendant will face
At KAASS LAW, we have a proven track record of successfully defending individuals and businesses against federal fraud charges, including mail and wire fraud. We understand the intricacies of these laws and commit to providing our clients with the highest quality legal representation. If you are facing accusations of mail or wire fraud, contact us today for a confidential consultation. We will review your case, explain your options, and develop a defense strategy to protect your rights and your future. Don't face these serious charges alone. Let the experienced attorneys at KAASS LAW fight for you.
In California, damaging property is a serious offense. Especially if it has to do with phone, electricals, and even utility lines. Penal Code Section 591 makes it a crime for these types of damages. Maliciously taking down, disconnecting, cutting or obstructing any line of telegraph, phones, cable TV, or any line used to conduct electricity is punishable. Our modern contemporary society depends and relies on these utilities. These vital services is powers our homes and businesses. The following will dive into the specifics of CA Penal Code 591. Furthermore, we will be exploring the violations, potential penalties and the importance of seeking legal counsel if facing these types of charges under this statute.
Under California Penal Code Section 591 it is illegal to maliciously and purposely damage, obstruct, disconnect remove, or otherwise injure wires, cables, television, or any equipment that is used for a telephone, cable, or electric service. Often the crime of damaging phone, electrical, or utility lines is charged in combination with other offenses such as burglary or domestic violence. For committing this crime during an episode of domestic violence or burglary the defendant can face harsher charges than under .
Riding the open road with the wind hitting your way can be eventful in your motorcycle rental. However, things can go sideways when dealing with a collision that puts bodily harm upon yourself. Since the vehicle is not yours, or if the other party collided with you with a rented motorcycle, the question arises. Can I sue a rental motorcycle company for this accident? This is a valid question to ask, and here at KAASS LAW, we can help. We understand the devastating impact accidents can have. Furthermore, we dedicate to helping injured individuals understand their rights and pursue just compensation. The following will explore the circumstances under which a rental motorcycle company might be liable for an accident. As a result, this will bring challenges involved in such cases.
When the driver of a rental vehicle is a part of the accident, it is important to know who is liable and how the injured victim must get compensation for the caused injuries. Usually, incidents where a rental motorcycle has been obtained by a driver do not lead to a case because the driver accepts responsibility for the motorcycle, and the rental company can't be responsible for damages to the victim. Though, it is often difficult to discern without a thorough investigation which insurance carrier must provide funds. When the driver has purchased a rental company's insurance, less coverage is allocated to the driver than his own insurance would allow. Generally, a renter needs to get his own liability insurance to rent a car, and if he doesn't, he is supposed to buy liability insurance with minimum coverage through the rental vehicle company. In California, rental vehicle companies do not automatically provide protection to a renter as part of the rental agreement, though some do provide minimum liability protection to international renters. In case a person is suing a driver of a rental motorcycle for causing injuries, usually, he will have to establish the elements of negligence such as duty, a breach of duty, causation, and damages. But, in case the driver has insufficient insurance coverage for the accident, whether, through his personal insurance policy or a policy from the rental motorcycle company. The injured person may not be able to recover the full scope of the damages. Even if he manages to establish the driver's liability for the accident.
In today's globalized marketplace, the allure of lower prices can sometimes lead consumers down a dangerous path: the world trafficking of counterfeit goods. From knock-off handbags and electronics to fake pharmaceuticals and automotive parts. The proliferation of counterfeit products poses a significant threat to businesses, consumers, and the economy as a whole. While consumers may think they're getting a bargain. However, the reality is that counterfeit goods often fund organized crime, endanger public health and safety, and undermine the integrity of brands. The federal government takes the trafficking of counterfeit goods extremely seriously. Furthermore, those involved in these illicit activities face severe penalties under 18 USC Section 2320. This law provides a powerful tool for prosecutors to combat the growing problem of counterfeiting. Also, understanding its implications is crucial for anyone involving in the manufacturing, distribution, or sale of goods and services. At KAASS LAW, we dedicate to protecting our clients' interests and providing comprehensive legal representation. Cases involving intellectual property rights and federal criminal charges, including those related to counterfeit goods. The following will dive into the intricacies of 18 USC Section 2320, exploring what constitutes trafficking in counterfeit goods, the potential consequences, and the importance of securing experienced legal counsel.
![Anti-Kickback Statute [42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b)]](/_next/image?url=%2Fapi%2Fmedia%2Ffile%2FMetro-and-Subway-Accidents-Leading-to-Wrongful-Death-49.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
The healthcare industry operates a complex design but is there for a patient's well-being and maintains the integrity of federal healthcare programs. Among these regulations, the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) stands as a critical safeguard against improper financial relationships that can influence medical decision-making and inflate healthcare costs. This statute, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b), prohibits the knowing and willful exchange of remuneration to induce or reward referrals for services or items paid for by federal healthcare programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and TRICARE. Understanding the nuances of the AKS is paramount for healthcare providers, as violations can lead to severe penalties, including substantial fines, exclusion from federal healthcare programs, and even criminal prosecution. At KAASS LAW, we recognize the complexities of the AKS and its potential impact on healthcare practices. This blog post aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the statute, its implications, and the importance of seeking experienced legal counsel to ensure compliance.
According to the Anti-Kickback Statute 42 US Code Section 1320A-7B(B), it is prohibited to knowingly and willfully offer, solicit, pay, or receive anything of value which create any type of reward for referring patients to, recommending or arranging any type of purchase that falls under the payment made by health care benefit programs. The statute covers both the payers of kickbacks-those who pay or offer remuneration and the recipients of kickbacks-those who receive or solicit remuneration.
Accusations of fraud against the government can carry severe consequences, including hefty fines, imprisonment, and damage to your reputation. Two key federal statutes governing these offenses are 18 U.S.C. §§ 286 and 287, which address false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims made to the United States government. These laws are broad in scope, covering a wide range of fraudulent activities, from submitting false invoices to making misrepresentations in applications for government benefits. Understanding the nuances of these statutes, the potential penalties, and available defenses is crucial if you are facing allegations under either section. At KAASS LAW, we recognize the gravity of such accusations and are dedicated to providing comprehensive and robust legal representation to individuals and businesses targeted in these investigations. The following will dive into the specifics of 18 U.S.C. §§ 286 and 287. Furthermore. we will be exploring the elements of the offenses, potential defenses, and the critical importance of securing experienced legal counsel.
According to Title 18, US Code, Sections 286, and it is illegal to make false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims upon the United States or conspire to make such claims.
The war on drugs, a decades-long, generational disputes over illicit substances, is a complex web of laws and regulations at both the federal and state levels. While state laws often address possession and smaller-scale distribution, federal drug trafficking charges are way more harsher penalties and can have life changing consequences. These charges are not simply about possessing a small amount of an illegal substance; they involve a complex interplay of factors, including the type and quantity of the drug, the method of distribution, and any involvement in larger criminal organizations. Understanding the nuances of federal drug trafficking laws is crucial, as even seemingly minor missteps can lead to severe repercussions, including lengthy prison sentences, hefty fines, and a criminal record that can haunt you for years to come. At KAASS LAW, we understand the gravity of these charges and the impact they can have on your life. We are dedicated to providing aggressive and compassionate legal representation to individuals facing federal drug trafficking accusations. The following will provide a comprehensive overview of federal drug trafficking laws, potential defenses, and the importance of securing experienced legal counsel.
Federal drug trafficking law US Code 21 Section 841 states that it is unlawful to knowingly and intentionally manufacture, dispense, distribute, or possess the intention to manufacture, distribute or dispense a controlled substance; or distribute, create, dispense or possess with the intention to dispense or distribute the counterfeit substance.
According to California Vehicle Code Section 406(a), a "moped" or "motorized bicycle" (also known as an electric bike or e-bike) is capable of no more than 30 mph on level ground with fully operative pedals for human propulsion, or an electric motor, with or without pedals for human propulsion or a motor producing less than two gross brake horsepower and an automatic transmission. In California, electric bikes are not considered motor vehicles, and the riders are not required to have a license for operating them. An e-bike doesn’t need to be registered with the state. E-bike riders are not required to comply with California's financial responsibility law and are not required to have liability insurance. California State legislature passed Assembly Bill No. 1096 which classifies e-bikes into 3 categories based on the method of operation and maximum speed.
Class 1: E-bike with a top assisted speed of 20 mph that must be pedaled Class 2: E-bike with a top assisted speed of 20 mph that does not have to be pedaled Class 3: E-bike with a top assisted speed of 28 mph California laws also require the rider to obey the following basic bicycle laws:
California, a state synonymous with movement and progress, relies heavily on its intricate network of public transportation. From the iconic cable cars of San Francisco to the sprawling Metrolink system connecting Southern California, millions of people depend on common carriers to navigate their daily lives. We entrust these carriers with our safety, expecting a smooth and secure journey whether we're commuting to work, exploring a new city, or traveling across the state. But what happens when that trust is broken? What legal responsibilities do these common carriers bear, and what recourse do passengers have when negligence leads to injury? At KAASSS LAW, we understand the complexities surrounding common carrier law, and we're here to shed light on this crucial aspect of personal injury and transportation law, ensuring you understand your rights and the protections afforded to you as a passenger in California. Navigating the aftermath of an accident involving a common carrier can be daunting, but with the right legal guidance, you can pursue justice and secure the compensation you deserve.
According to California Civil Code Section 2168, a common carrier is everyone who offers the public to carry persons, property, or messages, excepting only telegraphic messages. Typically, a common carrier is transportation company that has a contract to transport property, people, and goods across or around within state lines as public services. A common carrier is any entity that holds itself out to the public as willing to transport passengers or property from one place to another for compensation. This definition encompasses a wide range of businesses, including:
At KAASS LAW, we understand that your reputation is invaluable. While many are familiar with defamation claims like libel and slander, a less discussed but equally damaging legal avenue exists. In another legal term, this called tort of false light. In California, false light claims offer recourse for individuals who are victims of privacy invasion and are in public display that is highly offensive to a reasonable person, even if the information isn't technically false. The following will delve into the intricacies of false light claims in California. As a result, this will be helping you understand your rights and whether you might have a viable legal case.
Invasion of privacy is defined as the intrusion of another person’s right to privacy and can be performed as an unreasonable interference with an individual’s confidential information, solitude, or public image. False light is considered a type of invasion of privacy tort, and it happens when one person alters the public image of another one by portraying that person in an offensive and false light.
To have a successful claim against a defendant, a plaintiff must be able to prove the following four elements:
PC 591 states that, prosecutor must establish the following elements to prove that the defendant is guilty of this damaging phone, electrical or utility lines under PC Section 591:
The defendant can also be charged with criminal obstructing or cutting electrical or telephone lines as a result of illegally making an unlawful connection with an electrical line.
For the purposes of PC Section 591, acting maliciously means that defendant had the intention to injure another one or do an unlawful act while accessing the electrical, phone, or cable lines.
An accident is the most common defense for these cases. In order to be successfully convicted of a violation of Penal code Section 591, the defendant must have acted willfully. If the incident was an accident then the defendant not act deliberately then he did not commit a crime.
In California law illegally and maliciously injuring electrical, cable or telephone lines is a wobbler and can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the case facts and the defendant's criminal history. The prosecutor will also take into account the extent of damage and the reason for the defendant’s actions.
Additional consequences can include possible civil suits from the victims. Thus the defendant can face additional financial liability if he or she is in a civil case for punitive damages for covering the cost of repairs.
Facing these types of charges can have serious consequences, including potential jail time, fines, fees, and or potentially having a criminal record. It is important to seek legal consultation or speak with an attorney right away. Our office can provide a service or can help investigate the case, negotiate with prosecution, or even represent you in court if needed. Checking the facts is the first thing we want to establish, then we would like help develop a defense strategy when applicable. Pena Code 591 isn't Capital Punishment, but still serious nonetheless. We warn all readers and anyone in the community to avoid any acts of harm or commit property damage. At KAASS LAW, we have the experience in helping individuals that are facing criminal charges, including destruction or damages of essential infrastructure. We understand how complex Penal Code 591 is and commit to providing our clients with the high quality legal representation. If you are dealing with these charges under this statue, contact us today for a consultation that will be confidential. We will be happy to review your case, explain your options and provide a defense strategy if necessary. Allow us to try to help you protect your rights. Don't face these serious charges alone alone. Let our litigating team help you.
In California, rental vehicle companies do not have an legal obligation to investigate a renter's driving record. However, the situation is different in case the at-fault driver rented the car with a suspended license. The rental motorcycle company is required to check the license and compare the signatures on the customer's license and the rental agreement. In case the rental vehicle company doesn't follow the mentioned procedure of verification, it may be held directly liable for negligent entrustment. This is when it rents to an incompetent or unfit driver who has a revoked or suspended license. The rental agency can also be liable if the provided motorcycle had a defect that could lead to an accident, and it was known by the company without a fix implemented. So, there was foreknowledge about the defective materials or parts within the motorcycle that were allocated to the victim of the accident. Even if an insurance policy coverage is at the motorcycle company. The business could still be liable for the damages due to the breach of duty. Furthermore, claims go through an insurance provider to guarantee compensation and recovery of the victim.
If you sustain an injury in an accident involving a rented motorcycle, it is important to seek legal consultation as soon as you can. Our personal injury firm can:
At KAASS LAW, we have years of experience in handling personal injury cases, including motorcycle accidents, with rental companies. We understand the complexities of these cases and we commit to helping our clients obtain the compensation they deserve. If you've you've been injured in an accident involving a rented motorcycle, contact us today for a confidential consultation. We will review your case, explain your options, and help you navigate the legal process. Don't face this difficult time alone. Let the experienced attorneys at KAASS LAW fight for you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdxKaTtFv-A If you’ve been injured in a motorcycle accident, we invite you to contact KAASS Law for a free consultation at (310) 943-1171. Our staff speaks English, Spanish, Armenian, Russian, and French.
According to Trafficking in Counterfeit Goods or Services law 18 USC Section 2320, you cannot knowingly and willfully perform, attempt, or conspire to perform any of acts listed below.
The the government must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt for convicting the defendant of federal counterfeiting:
In case the good, service, or drug was original and the attached trademark was genuine but was repackaged or altered after it was bought or distributed from the manufacturer, the defendant can’t be found guilty under 18 USC Section 2320.
This can be a valid defense in case the defendant can prove that he had a reasonable belief that the good, service or drug that he was selling was genuine.
In case the defendant caused serious bodily injury he will face:
For second or subsequent offense for federal counterfeiting the defendant will face:
In case the defendant’s action caused another person’s death he will face:
In case the defendant is convicted of counterfeiting drugs or military goods or services he will face:
For the second or subsequent crime of counterfeiting drugs or military goods or services he will face:
At KAASS LAW, we have extensive experience in handling cases involving intellectual property rights and federal criminal charges, including those related to counterfeit goods. We understand the complexities of 18 USC Section 2320 and commit to providing our clients with the highest quality legal representation. If you are facing allegations of trafficking in counterfeit goods, contact us today for a confidential consultation. Additionally, we offer consultation for anyone being accused of counterfeiting a prescription blank. We will review your case, explain your options, and develop a personalized defense strategy to protect your rights and your future. Don't face these serious charges alone. Let the experienced attorneys at KAASS LAW fight for you. [contact-form-7 id="5673" title="KAASS LAW Contact Form"]
Illegal remuneration includes anything of value and can take many forms besides cash, such as:
There are safe harbor regulations that protect certain payment and business practices that could otherwise implicate the Anti-Kickback Statute from criminal and civil prosecution. The safe harbor regulations put definitions of these practices to make them lawful for medical providers. The regulations must be exactly met with no exceptions to qualify for safe harbor protection.
The Anti-Kickback Statute is a criminal statute and it provides both civil and criminal penalties for violations. The criminal penalties are the following:
Additionally, the Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services can pursue:
Sometimes penalties for Anti-Kickback violations also include a period of debarment or exclusion from participation in Medicaid, Medicare, and all other federal programs which provide health benefits.
Anti-Kickback Statute and the Stark Law are the two main federal statutes that deal with remuneration related to improper referrals. Though the two laws are similar, there are several differences between the Stark Law and the Anti-Kickback Statute.
Given the complexity and severity of the AKS, healthcare providers must prioritize compliance. This includes:
At KAASS LAW, we understand AKS and its implications for healthcare providers. We can assist you with:
Navigating the complexities of the AKS requires careful planning and expert legal guidance. Don't wait until you are facing an investigation or enforcement action.
Additionally, we also can help victims from Federal Health Care Fraud as well.
Contact KAASS LAW today for a confidential consultation to discuss your compliance needs and protect your practice.
The prosecution must establish the following element to convict the defendant under US Code Section 286.
There can also be two additional elements, depending on the district:
The prosecution must establish the following element to convict the defendant under the US Code, Section 287.
False - means illegal and deliberately untrue. Presenting a false claim is having the intention to perpetrate a betrayal of trust or fraud. Fictitious - means not real, feigned, or pretended. Fraudulent- means made, done, or affected with the intention to carry out a fraud.
Examples of claims against the US include, but are not limited to:
Presentation of a claim against the government must be more than an intention to make a claim; it must be presented physically and actually, and thereby made to the government. The defendant can be convicted for only presenting the false claim and it is not necessary that the government pay or otherwise fulfill the fraudulent claim. Moreover, the claim doesn’t have to be presented directly to the government, it can be presented to an intermediary authorized to accept the claim on behalf of the government, such as a tax return preparer, as long as the defendant is aware that the claim will we be presented to the government.
Actually the process of making a claim against the government can be very confusing, and claimants can sometimes make honest mistakes. In case the prosecution can’t prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant made the false claim knowingly and intentionally he cannot be criminally liable for this crime.
In case the defendant can show that his claim was true and correct, then the charges can fall into dismissal.
Section 286: Conspiracy to defraud the Government with respect to claims.
Section 287: False, fictitious or fraudulent claims.
At KAASS LAW, we have extensive experience in representing businesses in matters involving false claim allegations. We understand the complexities of these cases and commit to protecting our clients' interests. If you are facing such accusations, contact us today for a confidential consultation. Also, we offer guidance on how to deal with Notary Fraud, so please don't hesitate on seeking legal guidance! We will review your case, explain your options, and develop a strategy to minimize the impact on your business and your rights. Don't wait until it's too late and protect your business by seeking experienced legal counsel now from our team!
The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the following elements to convict the defendant of federal drug trafficking:
A counterfeit substance is a controlled substance that has the container or labeling of any trademark, identifying mark, trade name, number, imprint, device, or any likeness thereof, of a manufacturer, dispenser, or distributor or without authorization.
The defendant is likely to be charged with a federal drug crime charges in case the criminal activity:
Small amounts of drugs can be considered to be for personal use, and are often handled by local and state officials. But, in case the defendant is involved with larger amounts of drugs with the intent to distribute, his case is more likely to be handled by federal authorities.
The judge considers the following factors when determining the defendant’s sentence:
According to the Controlled Substance Act (CSA), controlled substances are divided into five schedules based on their perceived abuse potential, safety concerns, and medical utility. Drugs listed in Schedule I have the highest potential for abuse. The defendant can face a 10-year minimum sentence for manufacture or possession with the intent to distribute the following drugs:
The defendant can face up to 20 years in federal prison for a second offense, and a life sentence for a third offense. In case someone suffered great bodily injury or died as a result of the crime the penalties can double from a minimum of 20 years to a life sentence for a subsequent offense.
The defendant will also face a mandatory minimum sentence of 5 years in federal prison for smaller amounts of drugs.
The defendant will face harsher penalties in case he carried a firearm during a drug trafficking crime, was trafficking drugs near a federal facility or school, or used a minor under the age of 18 in drug operations.
At KAASS LAW, we have an experienced office in defending individuals against federal drug trafficking charges. We understand the complexities of federal law and are committed to providing our clients with the highest quality legal representation. If you are facing federal drug trafficking accusations, contact us today for a confidential consultation. Additionally, if you received any trouble from drugs hidden in a false compartment, we can also help! We will review your case, explain your options, and provide legal options in protecting your rights and your future. Don't face these serious charges alone. Let KAASS LAW fight for you. [contact-form-7 id="5673" title="KAASS LAW Contact Form"]
E-bike accident injuries can be extensive, including fatalities. As e-bikes are faster and heavier than conventional bicycles, the e-bike force of impact on a pedestrian can be up to forty-five times harder. Here are the most common types of injuries associated with e-bikes:
For holding an at-fault party accountable for the accident, a victim proves that the at-fault driver's negligence was the main factor in the crash. If the driver was impaired, speeding, distracted, or otherwise careless, he can be liable for caused injuries. There are several ways of proving the fault and determining the liability.
In case a defective or dangerous roadway caused a bicycle crash, the city or governmental agency, responsible for maintaining the roadway can be liable for the accident.
In case the crash took place because of a malfunction with the e-bike itself, the victim can sue the manufacturer with a defective design, defective manufacturing or labeling or warning error claims
Potentially liable parties in personal injury electric bike lawsuits also include pedestrians and other e-bike drivers.
A successful e-bike accident claim will include compensation for:
If you or a loved one has been injured in an e-bike accident we encourage you to contact experienced bike accident attorneys at KAASS Law for a free consultation today.
The key element distinguishing a common carrier from a private carrier is the public offering. A private carrier, like a company that only transports its own goods or employees, does not fall under the same legal obligations as a common carrier.
Here are the elements which the plaintiff must establish under a negligence cause of action:
Common carriers in California are subject to a higher standard of care than other automobile operators. Under California Civil Code Section 2100 a common carrier “must use the utmost diligence and care and for the safe carriage, must provide everything necessary for that purpose, and must exercise to that end a reasonable degree of skill”. Typically, common carriers must follow the below-mentioned guidelines:
Here are some examples of unseen parties that can be liable for an accident involving a common carrier:
Normally a plaintiff has two years from the date of the accident to file a personal injury cause against the common carrier. There is a six-month deadline to file a claim for plaintiffs who have suffered injuries while on-board common carriers owed by public entities. Failure to file a claim within the six-month period will bar the injured person from recovery. In some cases, California civil courts allow exceptions for this rule:
Victims suffered from the common carrier’s negligent conduct have a right to monetary recovery for all their losses, including:
At KAASS LAW, we're dedicated to protecting the rights of individuals injured due to the negligence of common carriers. We understand the complexities of this area of law and have a proven track record of success in representing clients in these cases. If you or a loved one has been injured while riding on a bus, train, plane, or any other form of common carrier, contact us today for a free consultation. We're here to fight for you and help you get back on track. Don't let negligence derail your life. Let KAASSS LAW be your guide.
Publication doesn’t necessarily need to be an actual publication, such as online or in a newspaper. Usually, it involves making the matter public or communicating the matter to the public, which means more than a few people.
In California, a plaintiff has one year to file a lawsuit against the defendant for the false light invasion of privacy. This period starts running when the plaintiff knows or should have reasonably known about the defendant's unlawful actions.
False light incidents can cause much damage to a person and typically the main legal remedy will be a monetary damages award. A monetary amount, in full payment, by the defendant to the plaintiff for compensating the losses he has experienced as a result of the false light incident. The damages may cover losses such as:
A plaintiff can have a limit to a false light claim in case their extremely open about the publication, such as made no efforts to hide it and it was something commonly known with other people.
If you believe you have been the victim of false light, it's crucial to seek legal advice as soon as possible. An experienced attorney at KAASS LAW can evaluate your case, explain your legal options, and help you pursue justice. We can investigate the circumstances surrounding the publication, gather evidence to support your claim, and negotiate with the defendant or represent you in court.
At KAASS LAW, we dedicate in protecting our clients' rights and reputations. If you believe you have been the victim of false light in California, contact us today for a confidential consultation. We will carefully review your case and provide you with honest and straightforward legal advice. Additionally, we are quite familiar with filing a CA Tort Claims Act. Give us a call so we can assess and schedule a consultation for legal assistance!
Don't let a false portrayal damage your reputation any longer. Let KAASS LAW fight for you.