Stay updated with the latest legal news, expert analysis, and firm updates from KAASS LAW.
Whether you're facing a legal challenge or seeking proactive counsel, our award-winning team is ready to defend your interests.
An individual's injuries as a result of a defective product are the focus of a product liability action. A medication, a toy, an electronic device, or anything else could be the product. The most important thing is that the product is defective or malfunctioning in some way, and that the flaw or malfunction injures someone. Every year, thousands of people in the United States are wounded as a result of defective or harmful products. As a result, there are laws in place to provide legal recourse. According to California Product Liability Laws, any person who designs, produces, or sells a defective product is strictly liable for the product's damages, even in case the person or company was not negligent.
Generally, a plaintiff must be able to establish the following elements, to prevail on a claim for products liability in California,
A defendant must usually have done (or failed to do) anything with negligence, gross negligence, recklessness, or the intent to cause harm in order to be liable for a plaintiff's injuries. However, in exceptional cases, a defendant may be accountable for a plaintiff's injuries despite the fact that the defendant did nothing wrong. Whoever creates, manufactures, or distributes a defective product that is more dangerous than it should be. As a result, it is solely responsible for any harm that the product can cause.
Liability claims for defective products uses a basis of negligence, strict liability, or a breach of the warranty of fitness. Because there is no federal product liability legislation, jurisdiction decides where the claim is submitted. Because of this lack of consistency, the US Department of Commerce published the Model Uniform Products Liability Act (MUPLA). This tries to develop standardized procedures for the products liability tort. There are essentially three types of claims under strict product liability:
In manufacturing defects claims, the plaintiff asserts that a specific product was defectively manufactured as compared to products in the same line, and the particular units of the product were defectively manufactured. So, the product presented harm which actually was a result of the manufacturing defects.
A lawsuit based on a product's poor design is the first sort of product liability claim. In a legal case based on defective design, the plaintiff claims that the product is inherently unsafe due to its design rather than a manufacturing error. To asses defective design product liability claims California this using two tests:
According to this test, after the plaintiff shows that the defective product design caused the injuries. The defendant now has the entire burden of proof. The defendant must prove that the utility of the defective product design outweighs the risk of the design. If he fails to do that, then the plaintiff will win the case.
According to this test, a product’s design will be defective in case it fails to perform as safely as an ordinary consumer would expect it to perform.
According to California's strict product liability, a defendant who is aware that the consumer is using the product in a reasonably foreseeable manner. That exposes him to a risk of injuries is under obligation to warn the consumer of the risk of injury or harm. The defendant can be liable for a failure to warn when such failure could have altered the outcome. So, in case a typical consumer would have become aware of the risk of injuries or harm on his own, then the defendant can’t be liable for failing to warn of an already-known hazard.
If you or a loved one has been harmed as the of defective product, then you may be entitled to compensation. If that is the case, contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171. [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAfPxXwzc2E[/embed]
In the realm of legal responsibility, there's a concept called "vicarious liability" that can hold you accountable for the actions of another person, even if you weren't directly involved. This legal doctrine, while complex, plays a crucial role in ensuring fairness and protecting victims in various situations. At KAASS LAW, we understand the intricacies of vicarious liability and dedicate to providing clear legal guidance and representation. The following will explore the concept of vicarious liability in California. Furthermore, this will be explaining its applications, implications, and how it might affect you.
Vicarious liability is a legal doctrine that holds one person or entity liable for the wrongful actions of another person. Even if the first person or entity did not directly cause the harm. This liability arises from a specific relationship between the parties, such as employer-employee, principal-agent, or parent-child. The rationale behind vicarious liability is that the person or entity in a position of control or authority should bear some responsibility for the actions of those under their supervision or influence.
The employer can be accountable for an employee's negligent actions. This is referred to as respondent superior law. According to :
When we purchase a product, we expect it to be safe and function as intended. Unfortunately, defective products can cause serious injuries, property damage, and even death. California law provides a framework for holding manufacturers, distributors, and retailers accountable for the harm caused by defective products. At KAASS LAW, we are dedicated to protecting consumers and ensuring they receive the compensation they deserve for injuries caused by defective products. The following explores the intricacies of product liability lawsuits in California. Furthermore, this will be explaining the types of defects, the legal theories involved, and the steps you can take! KAASS LAW, we dedicate in protecting consumers and ensuring they receive the compensation they deserve for injuries caused by defective products. This blog post explores the intricacies of product liability lawsuits in California, explaining the types of defects, the legal theories involved, and the steps you can take to seek justice. The harms a person sustains as a result of a defective product are the focus of a product liability case. A medication, toy, electronic gadget, or anything else could be the product. The crucial factor is that the product must be faulty or malfunction in some way, causing harm to someone. There are regulations in place to give people legal remedies because unsafe and defective items injure thousands of people every year.
Contracts are the foundation of countless transactions and relationships in our society, from buying a cup of coffee to complex business agreements. While the written terms of a contract define the explicit obligations of each party, California law goes further by recognizing an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in every contract. This covenant, though not explicitly written, requires parties to act honestly and fairly in their contractual dealings, ensuring that neither party unfairly interferes with the other's right to receive the benefits of the agreement. At KAASS LAW, we understand the nuances of contract law and commit to protecting your rights and interests. The following will explore the covenant of good faith and fair dealing in California, explaining its significance, potential breaches, and how we can help if your contractual rights have been in violation. Every contract and agreement in California contains an implied promise of good faith and fair dealing. This means that each party shouldn't do anything to unfairly interfere with the right of any other party for receiving benefits of the contract. Though, the implied promise of fair dealing and good faith can't create obligations that are inconsistent with the terms of the contract.
Conservatorship is a legal process where a court appoints a responsible person or entity to care for an adult who is deemed unable to care for themselves or manage their own finances. It's a significant undertaking with far-reaching implications for the individual under conservatorship, their family, and the appointed conservator. In California, conservatorship laws are there to strike a delicate balance between protecting vulnerable individuals and preserving their autonomy. At KAASS LAW, we understand the complexities and sensitivities surrounding conservatorships. The following will provide a comprehensive overview of conservatorship in California, exploring the different types, the process involved, and the rights and responsibilities of all parties. Conservatorship is a court proceeding when a judge assigns an entity or individual to manage the financial affairs and exercise the legal rights of a mentally ill person. The court refers to the person managing the legal rights and finances of the disordered person as the "conservator." The disabled person is the "conservatee."
Usually, a conservator is a spouse, child, domestic partner, relative, friend, or neighbor of a disabled person. Although conservatorship law prefers a family member of the conservatee, in some cases the court can appoint professional conservators, government, or non-profits agencies.
Prescription drugs play a vital role in managing health conditions, but they can also be misused and abused. California law takes a strong stance against prescription fraud, including forging or altering prescriptions. These actions not only endanger public health but also carry severe legal consequences. At KAASS LAW, we understand the complexities of prescription drug laws and are committed to providing accurate legal information and representation. The following will explore the legal ramifications of forging or altering a prescription in California, outlining the potential charges, penalties, and defenses.
Under California Business and Professions Code Section 4324 it is illegal to forge or alter a prescription, or possess drugs acquired through a false prescription. It is a crime in California to forge a prescription or make an attempt to gain possession of prescription drugs. However, in case a person actually got medication as a result of forging a prescription, he will be also liable under Business & Professions Code Section 4324(b). A person can be convicted of both offenses i.e. forging the prescription and obtaining the medication through false prescription.
California is an "at-will" employment state, meaning that employers generally have the right to terminate employees for any legal reason or even for no reason at all. However, there are important exceptions to this rule, and one of the most significant is the principle of "wrongful termination in violation of public policy." At KAASS LAW, we are dedicated to protecting the rights of employees and ensuring that they are not unjustly dismissed from their jobs. The following will explore the concept of wrongful termination in violation of public policy in California. Furthermore, we will be explaining the legal basis for such claims, common scenarios, and how we can help.
Wrongful termination in violation of public policy happens when an employer fires an employee for performing a legal obligation or exercising a legal right, and the obligation or right is related to important public policy. California law prohibits employers from firing their employees in case that discharge would be in violation of public policy. This is true even though California is an at-will employment state. To add, employers have the right to terminate employment relationships at any time without reason. Specifically, the employee can sue the employer for wrongful termination in case the employer has fired him for:
Unfortunately, accidents and incidents can be unavoidable sometimes. It can happen to any innocent man or woman and anywhere, during a working day or a holiday. You can appear into a slip and fall accident or in an automobile accident in the most unexpected moment and suffer either property damages or personal injuries. One of the common ways to get a compensation is settling a personal injury claim with an insurance company. Insurance companies exist to protect people from different kind of unpredictable and undesired coincidences. Here is a list of several insurance companies operating in Los Angeles: Kemper, Alliance, Farmers, State Farm, Mercury, Safeco, Infiniti, Allstate, Progressive, Esurance etc. Every insurance company has its own policies, procedures and different suggestions. You can file an insurance claim for various types of scenarios. It depends on the type of your insurance and on the policies and procedures. In most cases some documentation must be done, and the terms must be strictly kept. Filing a claim with an insurance company can be a tough and time-consuming process full of uncertainty and tricky procedures. firms’ attorneys are good professionals and experienced in such cases. They can be there to help and to provide you with deserved outcomes.
In California, when someone's conduct is particularly egregious, the court may award "punitive damages" on top of compensatory damages. These damages are not meant to compensate the victim for their losses but to punish the defendant and deter similar behavior in the future. At KAASS LAW, we have extensive experience handling cases involving punitive damages and understand the complexities of pursuing these claims. The following will explores the concept of punitive damages in California, explaining when they are awarded, how they are calculated, and the legal strategies involved in securing them.
Punitive damages are damages that a defendant in a civil action can be ordered to pay to punish him for egregious conducting including employment claims and personal injury. Commonly, punitive damages can’t be awarded for a simple breach of contract, but can be awarded in cases such as insurance company bad faith when the company unlawfully refuses to pay a legitimate claim. California Civil Code Section 3294 allows a jury to award punitive damages to the plaintiff in a personal injury case. The plaintiff must be able to establish convincing and clear evidence that the defendant's conduct amounted to oppression, malice or fraud.
Fraud against the government wastes taxpayer dollars and undermines essential public programs. The California False Claims Act (CFCA) is a powerful tool for combating fraud and holding accountable those who seek to defraud the state or local governments. At KAASS LAW, we commit to protecting the public interest and pursuing justice against those who engage in fraudulent activities. As a result, the following will navigate an overview of the CFCA. As a result, we will be explaining its key provisions, the types of fraud it covers, and how individuals can play a role in exposing fraud against the government. We strive for our readers and clients to stay informed!
The California False Claims Act (CFCA) is a law which provides civil penalties for business entities or individuals who commit certain forms of theft, embezzlement or fraud with respect to state or local government funds. CFCA allows a public entity to recover damages from any entity or person that knowingly presents a false claim for any payment or approval.
According to CACI 4800, the plaintiff must be able to prove all the following elements to establish the claim:
The employer can be held liable if the plaintiff is able to prove the following:
CACI 3720 provides some guidance to what is considered "scope of employment"
California Civil Jury Instruction 3700 provides a concise and clear explanation of the basics of vicarious liability. One can authorize another one to act on his behalf in transactions with third parties. This kind of relationship is another term, "agency." The person giving the authority, "the principal," and the person to whom the authority is giving, "the agent." A principal can be liable for the actions of his agents, joint venture members, partners, and, in some cases, independent contractors. The principal actor can be an individual or company. The liability extends to the principal for actions that are within the scope of the agent's powers and duties to act on behalf of the principal. Normally, any intentional tort isn't considered to be within the scope of an agent's duties, and a principal won't be held accountable unless the principal clearly approves the conduct.
In some cases, California laws impose liability on parents for damage or injuries to people or property caused by their children. Vicarious liability of a parent for the actions of his child is applicable under the following conditions:
Under California law, a member of a conspiracy can also be held liable for crimes committed by his co-conspirators. The plaintiff must prove that the co-conspirators' actions were foreseeable and commit with the intent of furthering the objective of the conspiracy.
Vicarious liability has significant implications for both individuals and businesses.
Vicarious liability can be a complex legal concept with significant consequences. At KAASS LAW, we have extensive experience navigating vicarious liability claims and can provide guidance and representation in various situations. If you have questions about vicarious liability or believe you may have a claim, contact us today. We'll help you understand your rights and options and work to protect your interests. Alternatively, if you would like to understand strict liability laws in personal injury cases, we can help navigate as well. Do you have more questions about laws in California? If so, KAASS LAW would be happy to provide you with additional information at any time! Give us a call at (310) 943-1171 or fill out the form below, and one of our team members will contact you! [contact-form-7 id="5673" title="KAASS LAW Contact Form"]
To win a case for product liability in California, the plaintiff has to be able to prove the following elements:
Usually, a defendant must have acted (or omitted to act) with gross negligence, recklessness, or malice in order to be held accountable for a plaintiff's injuries. However, in some cases, a defendant could be strictly accountable for the plaintiff's injuries, even though they were not their fault. Anyone who produces or sells a product that is riskier than it ought to be is in violation of California law. Strict liability exists for any injuries of using the product in a manner that is reasonably foreseeable. Alternatively, or that fails to provide adequate warnings.
Liability claims for defective products can occur on the basis of negligence, strict liability, or a breach of the warranty of fitness. Because there is no federal product liability legislation, this will usually depend on the jurisdiction. Because of this lack of consistency, the US Department of Commerce published the Model Uniform Products Liability Act (MUPLA), which attempts to promote uniform processes for the products liability tort. There are essentially three types of claims under strict product liability:
In manufacturing defects claims, the plaintiff asserts that a specific product was defectively manufactured as compared to products in the same line. So, the product presented harm which actually was a result of the manufacturing defects.
A lawsuit based on a product's poor design is the first sort of product liability claim. In a legal case based on defective design, the plaintiff claims that the product is inherently unsafe due to its design rather than a manufacturing error. In California, there are two tests used in assessing defective design product liability claims:
According to the Risk-Benefit Test, after the plaintiff shows that the defective product design caused the injuries, the burden of proof completely shifts to the defendant. The defendant must prove that the utility of the defective product design outweighs the risk of the design. If he fails to do that, then the plaintiff will win the case.
According to this test, a product's design will be defective in case it fails to perform as safely as an ordinary consumer would expect it to perform.
According to California's strict product liability, a defendant is aware that the consumer is using the product in a reasonably foreseeable manner. Will be eligible to warn the consumer of the risk of injury or harm if exposed to a risk of injury is eligible to warn the consumer of the risk of injury or harm. The defendant can be liable for a failure to warn when such failure could have a different outcome. So, if a typical consumer becomes aware of the risk of injuries or harm on his own, then the defendant can't be liable for failing to warn of an already-known hazard.
Contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171. [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAfPxXwzc2E[/embed]
According to CACI 325, in a breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing action, a plaintiff must be able to prove all of the following elements:
California law defines certain types of conduct and acts which can qualify as insurance bad faith. They include the following:
In California most insurance contracts contain the following provisions:
In California, insurers are required to indemnify and defend the policyholders in case a risk is even possibly covered, thus even if the reason for the accident is unknown, the insurer is obliged to treat it as a covered risk. On the other hand, the policyholder must act in good faith and comply with the notice requirements.
There are a number of potential damages the plaintiff can recover if the insurer has committed bad faith.
If you believe that a party has breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in a contract with you, it's crucial to seek legal counsel. At KAASS LAW, we have extensive experience handling contract disputes and protecting the rights of our clients. We can help you:
The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is a crucial protection in California contract law, ensuring that parties act honestly and fairly in their contractual relationships. If you believe your contractual rights have been in violation, don't hesitate to contact KAASS LAW for a free consultation. We're here to help you navigate the complexities of contract law and fight for the justice you deserve.
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVyDDTn7trQ[/embed]
According to CACI 400, to succeed in the claim, the petitioner must be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt all of the following elements:
Probate conservatorships include:
In California, the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act governs the involuntary treatment of the mentally ill person. The act has a goal of ending the indefinite and inappropriate commitment of the mentally ill, providing adequate evaluation and treatment to a person with serious mental disorders, protecting and guaranteeing public safety, and providing supervision, individualized treatment, and placement services for the disabled person through a conservatorship program. Lanterman-Petris-Short conservatorship is to care for adults who have serious mental health illnesses and need special care. This type of conservatorship is generally is for people who require extensive mental health treatment and very restrictive living arrangements. Lanterman-Petris-Short conservatorships must start by a local government agency.
Conservators have multiple duties to perform for taking care of the conservatee's needs and here is the list of some duties a conservator may perform.
Typically, termination of the conservatorship happens when the conservatee passes away. In case the conservatee doesn't meet the standards for having a conservator, a court can cancel the appointment. Additionally, the conservatee can petition a court with the assistance of a conservatorship lawyer in case he believes he has strong evidence that he is better off without that care.
In California, conservatorships are protective court procedures for adults, while guardianships protect minors.
Conservatorships are complex legal proceedings with significant implications for everyone. Whether you're considering establishing a conservatorship, challenging an existing one, or seeking guidance as a conservator, it's essential to have experienced legal counsel. At KAASS LAW, we can help you:
At KAASS LAW, we approach conservatorship matters with compassion and sensitivity, recognizing the significant impact they have on individuals and families. We are dedicated to providing personalized legal guidance and support, helping you navigate the complexities of conservatorship and achieve the best possible outcome for all involved. If you have questions about conservatorship or need legal assistance with a conservatorship matter, contact us today for a free consultation.
The prosecution must prove the following elements to convict the defendant of forging or altering a prescription:
Prescription forgery is the use of a falsified prescription for purchasing drugs illegally. Forging or altering a prescription is making, publishing, uttering, passing, or attempting to pass a prescription for drugs or possessing drugs acquired by a false prescription. Attempting to transfer another person a falsified prescription, even if you didn’t actually write it, is also a crime.
Prescription is an instruction to provide drugs, either by phone, through writing, or through electronic communications (i.e., facsimile). Generally, a valid prescription must include the following information:
The term “drug” under California Business and Professions Code Section 4025 include:
The defendant is guilty of falsely uttering a prescription in situations where the defendant:
Some common defenses to charges related to forged prescriptions
Business and Professions Code section 4324 forging or altering a prescription is considered a "wobbler offense". As such, the offense can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the defendant’s criminal history, as well as other factors.
Penalties for misdemeanor Business and Professions Code 4324 conviction include:
Penalties for felony Business and Professions Code 4324 conviction include:
Furthermore, additional penalties a defendant can face include the following:
If you're facing charges for prescription fraud, it's crucial to have experienced legal representation. A skilled criminal defense attorney can:
At KAASS LAW, we understand the serious consequences of prescription fraud charges. Our attorneys dedicate to protecting your rights and fighting for the best possible outcome in your case. If you are under accusation with forging or altering prespeciptions, contact us today for a free consultation. We'll review your case, explain your legal options, and develop a strong defense strategy to protect your future. Moreover, any matters involving a wrongful death due to prescription drugs, please contact us today.
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uRUMZSCoLI[/embed]
According to CACI 2430, the plaintiff must be able to establish the following elements to prove the claim of wrongful termination in violation of a public policy.
One important thing the plaintiff must prove is that there is a clear causal connection between his termination and the employer's public policy violation.
The most common lawsuits over wrongful discharge in violation of public policy involve situations when employees are terminated for reporting illegal conduct that the employer has engaged in. This protected by law activity is called "whistleblowing." Federal laws protect employees who speak up about the employer who violates the law. By witnessing the questionable behavior of the employer, whistleblowing employees have immunity against termination and retaliation after reporting the employer to law enforcement. Employees have a right to sue the employer in case they are terminated because of whistleblowing. Here are some federal and California laws that provide support for employees who want to protect their rights after being fired for whistleblower activities. These include:
An employee wrongfully terminated in violation of public policy may recover the following damages:
In most cases, the deadline for filing a lawsuit against the employer for wrongful termination in violation of public policy in California is two years from the date of the termination. However, responses to certain kinds of illegal termination have shorter deadlines for filing a complaint or suit. For example, if the employment relationship is terminated in retaliation for complaining about harassment or discrimination at the workplace, the plaintiff must file a complaint within one year.
Wrongful termination cases can be complex and challenging, requiring a thorough understanding of employment law. Gathering evidence isn't easy. At KAASS LAW, we have extensive experience representing employees who are victims of wrongful termination. We can help you:
If you believe you've been wrongfully terminated, don't hesitate to contact KAASS LAW for a consultation. We'll listen to your story, answer your questions, and explain your legal options. We're dedicated to helping employees fight back against unlawful termination and protect their livelihoods. Additionally, if you believe you're a victim of wrongful termination, post work injury, give us a call! [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4w4KPq605d0[/embed]
You should carefully read your insurance contract in order to reveal who can apply for compensation and who can be compensated. There are different insurance packages. You can have an Insurance that only covers your personal injuries, or your family member’s injuries can be included under the coverage too. That’s why it is very important to carefully examine the contract. You can can file a claim with your insurance company either personally or via law firms and/or attorneys. As was mentioned above, claiming procedure may include several terms and conditions in addition to plenty of documentation. It is important to know, that you need to introduce the accurate calculation of the financial losses caused by the accident. While there are some punitive damages that you could calculate yourself, such as lost wages and current medical charges, there are others that you may find practically impossible without the help of an attorney. These include the value of your pain and suffering, in addition to lost capacity of making money. Once you have dealt with all the medical affairs that may arise out of such an undesirable event, you may need to operate a personal injury claim with an insurance company to receive compensation for such injuries.
Insurance companies aim to help their insureds in the times of trouble, but like any business, they are trying to lessen your costs and expenses under their coverage to compensate less. It means they can save markedly in the amounts they have to pay to the insured. In these cases, dealing with insurance companies may even become confusing to a lawyer, let alone to a person without any legal discipline at all. The personal injury lawyers must know the rules, too. They must understand the guidelines and the terms. Additionally; these will include different filing procedures for claims against insurance companies. KAASS Law firm’s personal injury lawyers are experienced in such cases and they can assist you. They can help in the validity of the potential claim. They can ensure that the time limit, in your case, is met and the necessary documentation is done. This paperwork plays a huge role in such kind of processes and is a mandatory part of success.
California Civil Code Section 3294(c) gives the following definition to “malice,” “oppression” and “fraud”:
When dealing with a company as opposed to a private person, California Civil Code section 3294 states that the employer shouldn’t be legally liable for punitive damages, based upon acts of his employee, unless the employer had reasonable knowledge of the unfitness of the employee and hired him with a conscious disregard of the rights or safety of other people or ratified or authorized the illegal conduct for which the damages are awarded, or was personally guilty of fraud, oppression, or malice. With respect to a corporate employer, the reasonable knowledge and conscious disregard, ratification, authorization, or act of oppression, malice or fraud must be on the part of the director, officer, or managing agent of the corporation.
Some common scenarios include the following:
According to CACI 3940 the jury considers several factors when deciding the amount of punitive damages. Here are some of them:
Pursuing punitive damages requires careful legal strategy and thorough preparation. KAASS LAW can help you:
If you believe you may have a claim for punitive damages, contact KAASS LAW today for a free consultation. We have the experience and expertise to help you navigate the complexities of these claims and fight for the justice you deserve. We understand that pursuing a legal claim can be a daunting process, especially when you're dealing with the aftermath of a wrongful act. Our team is dedicated to providing compassionate and dedicated legal representation, guiding you through every step of the process and advocating for your rights.
Here is the list of some actions which constitute a violation of CFCA
For purposes of CFCA, a "claim" means a request for money, services, or property that will be provided directly or indirectly by the California state government or a local government.
With respect to information about the claim, "knowingly "means that:
To establish the claim, the plaintiff doesn't have to prove the specific intent of defrauding. "Material" means that the claim had a tendency to influence, or was capable of influencing, the payment or receipt of money, services, or property on the claim.
The CFCA imposes an additional legal responsibility for reporting false claims if a person has inadvertently received a benefit from a false claim, such as an accidental overpayment that goes unreported.
In case the defendant is found guilty in violation of the California False Claims Act, they will have to pay:
Under certain circumstances, such as self-reporting within 30 days or full cooperation, the penalties may have a reduction.
Under California law, the CFCA must be before the later of the following dates:
The CFCA allows private citizens to file qui tam lawsuits on behalf of the government to expose fraud. Also, in qui tam lawsuit, the relator, or whistleblower, brings the action on behalf of the government and shares in any recovery. The qui tam provisions of the CFCA:
Filing a qui tam lawsuit under the CFCA is a complex process that requires careful consideration and legal expertise. Additionally, lawsuit must be filed under a seal to allow the government time to investigate the allegations. The relator must provide the government with all evidence and information they have about the alleged fraud.
Fraud against the government wastes taxpayer dollars and undermines essential public services. As a result, the CFCA empowers individuals to play a crucial role in exposing fraud and holding accountable those who seek to defraud the government. We can guide you through understanding your rights and options under the CFCA, helping you take the necessary steps to protect the public interest. Also, If you're looking to file a claim against the California Government, we’re ready to assist you! Contact KAASS LAW today if you're seeking legal advice or consultation.