Stay updated with the latest legal news, expert analysis, and firm updates from KAASS LAW.
Whether you're facing a legal challenge or seeking proactive counsel, our award-winning team is ready to defend your interests.
In California, employers must to provide compensation to workers who use their personal automobiles for business-related activities. There are 4 ways to determine the refund:
No matter the method, employees are eligible to full payment.
According to California employment law, all employers inside the state must reimburse employees for any out-of-pocket business expenses. This comprises the costs related to utilizing the employee's personal vehicle for work-related reasons in addition to other related expenses. Employers must reimburse employees for all essential costs or losses incurred in the following:
Unless the employee knew they were unlawful while performing them, the employee is eligible to reimbursement even though the employer's instructions were against the law. These compensations cover the expenses incurred when an employee uses their own car for work. However, the cost of gas for the car is not always the only part of these costs. They also consist of:
Reimbursements are not need to be made in addition to an employee's pay or other compensation under California Labor Code 2802(a)LAB. However, there must be a way to divide up and identify this increased pay as reimbursement.
According to California law, there are 4 possible ways to determine how much an employee must pay for a car used for work-related purposes:
When utilizing any of these strategies, the employer is only responsible for covering their actual, necessary costs. It's possible that unnecessary car costs won't be paid for. Which reimbursement policy will be applied is a decision that the employer and employee must make together. Therefore, the parties must concur on the mileage reimbursement rate if one is to be used. Usually, the job contract or employee handbook will outline this. Any agreement, however, that denies an employee their entire entitlement to reimbursement for business-related automobile expenses is void. In fact, employees must have the chance to contest the appropriateness of the reimbursement under such an agreement.
In California, employers are able to pay employees a single fixed sum to cover vehicle-related expenses. Likewise known as:
This is a regular payment, often sent each month, of a specific amount that covers the employee's expenses. Employees who use their own automobiles to travel the same routes every day or week typically adopt the lump-sum technique. When the amount being put in use is constant, lump-sum payments could be desirable since they require fewer paperwork from both parties. However, a flat sum payment might not be sufficient due to shifting gas prices. Undercompensated workers in these circumstances have the right to contest the amount and demand full compensation.
Employers who underpay their workers for using their automobiles for personal purposes have the right to contest the amount of the reimbursement. Therefore, workers can demonstrate that the payment has been insufficient by providing documentation of their real costs. Workers may bring a wage and hour lawsuit if the employer does not make good on the discrepancy. Lastly, employees may bring a class-action lawsuit if their employer consistently refuses or fails to pay for their travel expenses.
If you need legal assistance with mileage reimbursement contact our office today for a consultation. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
Apartments are a place for students, adults, and children to live in close quarters. This is what makes them perfect living spaces for people who need to be near the center of a city or town. These apartments often come with many safety hazards that can lead to injury. Have you been hurt in an apartment-related accident? Tenants and visitors to apartment complexes sustain frequent injuries as a result of a landlord's failure to correct or repair certain dangerous conditions, such as flooding, shattered stairs, or collapsing decks. If you were injured in an apartment building, you are entitled to compensation. Personal injury lawsuits against landlords or apartment buildings for injuries on rental property are common. Premises liability lawsuits can be filed by our accident attorneys. Compensation may be obtainable through:
Accidents in apartments are fairly common and can cause a wide range of injuries. Apartments are a convenient way to live. There are some risks associated with this living situation, however. Knowing the most common injuries sustained by those living in an apartment is important so that you can prevent them or know what to do if they happen to you. Typical injuries include:
Fraudulent acts are committed by a relative or caregiver of a property owner. In many cases, they involve family disputes. There have been reports of children stealing their parents' property, people attempting to co-opt inheritances from their siblings, and people attempting to defraud their spouses. To transfer ownership, the scammers create fake documents, including fraudulent or incorrect notarizations. Unlike in many other parts of the country, California's laws and real estate practices make it very easy to fraudulently transfer property title. When a document is recorded, it becomes part of the official title chain, and the new owner, legitimate or not, can obtain loans or even sell the property. The statute of limitations is relatively short (three years for forgery and two years for fraud) and has frequently expired by the time the victim realizes his home is no longer in his name.
Fraud transfers include signed documents that allow a creditor to seize the debtor's assets or force the debtor to pay the debt from their income. Some judgment debtors decide to hide or dispose of their assets after learning that judgment collection methods will allow the creditor to seize their assets. Debtors, for example, may transfer their assets. This could be to relatives, friends, or legal entities, simply place the assets under false names, or burden their assets with fictitious debts. Debtors may engage in such schemes, the courts and legislature have long recognized. As a result, the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act provides remedies for creditors who face this issue. Making a mistake during a notarization can have serious financial and legal ramifications for California Notaries, and breaking the law on purpose can result in even harsher penalties. This guide will assist Notaries in becoming acquainted with the Golden State's Notary laws and penalties for misconduct.
The California law known as Vehicle Code 14601.3 VC defines a habitual traffic offender as anyone who drives with a license that is suspended or revoked and racks up too many points on their DMV record. Traffic infractions and vehicular offenses like DUI and dangerous driving result in the accumulation of points. A driver might become an HTO if they have a history of driving while their license is suspended or revoked. When a driver accumulates points on his DMV record, a history is generated.
To establish that a person is a habitual traffic offender under this section, the prosecution must establish the factors listed below:
The DMV is believed to have mailed the driver a notice of a suspension or revocation if the third criterion listed above, knowledge, is present. As a result of the fourth requirement above, the convictions need not be the result of distinct offenses.
In order to obtain compensation and compel corrective action, victims of nursing home abuse in California have a number of legal options. There are several options available, such as bringing legal action against the nursing home, reporting the abuse to the California Department of Aging, or making a police report and pressing charges. According to the statute, a "senior" is someone who resides in California and is at least 65 years old. As well as any California resident between the ages of 16 and 64 who has physical or mental impairments that limit their capacity to engage in daily activities.
There are several options available to people who think a family member is receiving abuse in a nursing home. People can:
Elders and their families are free to choose more than one option; neither is required.
Invasion of privacy laws are both criminal and civil in California. They involve false light claims and cases involving the public disclosure of private facts. The laws are similar in that a person does something that invades another's privacy. While the specific activities in criminal and civil proceedings differ in terms of definitions and how they are proven, they are both intrusions on a person's personal affairs.
The California Privacy Act is a wiretapping law. It prohibits the recording of confidential conversations without the consent of all participants. This includes telephone conversations. Victims of illegal wiretapping may be subject to legal damages. Breaking the law is a crime. Violators may face:
During a telephone conversation, both parties must agree to record. Which makes California a "bilaterally agreed" state.
Examples of invasion of privacy are everywhere. We've all heard the story of a man whose ex-boyfriend or girlfriend shared risky photos without their consent. Social media platforms are regularly used as a launching pad for personal attacks. Many of us have probably even become the target of extremely harmful or violent "gossip" about someone's highly personal information. These are all examples of invasion of privacy, and they are all flagrant violations of people's right to maintain the confidentiality of their personal affairs.
In the event of an accident involving a police vehicle, injured parties or their families may be eligible to file a personal injury claim or wrongful death case. Whether or not a police officer is responsible may depend on:
Accidents involving a police vehicle are distinct from other types of collisions. The driver may believe that the police are immune from liability if they struck a pedestrian or driver with their vehicle. However, in cases where a patrol car is a part of an accident and injures a motorist, passenger, or pedestrian, the police and the city may still be responsible. Everyone involved in an automobile collision needs to make sure they are okay and safe. The sufferers should seek quick medical assistance if they sustain any injuries. The driver and passengers should think about consulting a doctor even if they are unsure if they sustained any major injuries. A day or two after the collision, many car accident victims discover they sustained injuries. Avoid accepting responsibility for an accident. When the other driver is a police officer, it may be more challenging to accomplish this, especially if the officer is attempting to intimidate you. The decision on who was at fault for the accident is not up to the officer. After considering all the facts, the court should decide who was at blame, not on the basis of a single officer's point of view.
Employees occasionally have the right to sue their employers under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act for workplace harassment committed by a non-supervisor. Employees have a right under the FEHA to be free from all forms of harassment including:
Most individuals first consider supervisory harassment when they hear of workplace harassment. The FEHA prohibits the following types of supervisory harassment:
Every boater should be aware of the dangers of operating a vessel while under the influence of alcohol or drugs (BUI). Every state makes it illegal to operate a boat while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. A federal law against BUI is also enforced by the Coast Guard. This legislation applies to all boats (from canoes and rowboats to the largest ships), as well as foreign vessels operating in US waterways and US vessels operating on the high seas.
Boating under the influence are actions, which are criminalized under section 655 of the Harbors Navigation Code of California. Particularly, the above-mentioned section states that it is a crime to commit the following actions:
California BUI law criminalizes the following actions:
California law defines the term assault as follows: an attempt to cause violent injury to someone. We can deduce from the definition that the victim does not need to get severe injuries for criminal liability to exist, thus. Significant harm is not a requirement for the crime to exist. California law distinguishes between different types of assaults, which have their specific elements of the crime. For instance, there are separate sections for assault with a firearm, assault with caustic chemicals, etc. Further, we will examine one assault by means likely to produce great bodily injury.
Under Penal Code Section 245 (a) (4), assault is defined as using force likely to produce great bodily injury to the victim. This section covers situations where an individual intentionally attempts to cause significant harm to someone else using force, and the potential for injury is severe.
As stated, this type of assault does not require actual injury to occur. Even if the victim is not injured or the injury occurs accidentally, charges can still be brought against the defendant. In other words, an assault charge under this section can be made if there is an attempt to cause harm through violent force, even if no physical injury is inflicted.
It should be noted that the elderly are especially vulnerable to injury. They are more likely to obtain greater damages. If you don't want to experience these types of injuries, there are many precautions you can take. The following are some of the most common apartment accidents that can result in injuries:
In personal injury accident cases, common defendants include landlords, property owners, and property management firms. It is important to note that injury lawyers frequently file an apartment injury lawsuit under a state's premises liability laws. Property owners and occupants have a duty of care under these laws:
If a landlord or property owner breaches this duty, you will most likely prevail in a premises liability claim.
Apartment living comes with its own set of safety challenges, but there are steps you can take to reduce the risk of injury. Regularly inspect your apartment for hazards like loose floorboards, broken stairs, or malfunctioning lighting. Installing safety features like grab bars in bathrooms, non-slip mats in the kitchen, and securing rugs can prevent falls. Additionally, ensure that smoke detectors are working and fire exits are clearly marked. Taking proactive measures can help you avoid costly and painful accidents.
If you’ve injured yourself in an apartment complex, knowing what steps to take immediately can make all the difference in your case. Start by seeking medical attention, even if the injury seems minor. Document the accident scene by taking photos of hazardous conditions, such as broken steps or faulty railings. Report the injury to the property management and landlord, and keep records of your communication. Lastly, contact a personal injury attorney to help you navigate the legal process and ensure you receive proper compensation for your injuries.
Landlords must maintain a safe environment for their tenants. They are required by law to ensure the property is free from hazardous conditions that could lead to injuries. This responsibility includes performing regular maintenance checks, repairing broken fixtures, and ensuring common areas are safe. If a landlord fails to meet these responsibilities, they may become liable for injuries sustained by tenants or visitors. If you suffer an injury due to a landlord’s negligence, you may qualify for compensation through a premises liability lawsuit.
Every year, people living in apartments report hundreds of injuries. This is a concerning statistic that should be addressed to ensure that you do not suffer a similar injury. If you have suffered a serious injury, an injury attorney can assist you in managing your ongoing medical care. Give our office a call if you have been injured in an apartment-related accident at 310.943.1171.
If a Notary commits an infraction, the penalties under California law are divided into four categories:
It is critical to understand that misconduct can result in multiple penalties for a Notary. For example, if a Notary is found negligent for failing to properly complete and seal an acknowledgment on a real estate document, the Secretary of State may impose a civil penalty as well as suspend or revoke the Notary's commission. Furthermore, if the Notary's error resulted in a financial loss for the signer, the signer could sue the Notary to recover any damages incurred as a result of the faulty notarization. Intentionally violating state Notary laws ("willful misconduct") carries significantly harsher penalties than unintentional violations ("negligence").
Notary misconduct can be avoided by the following steps:
Property title fraud can have serious consequences for homeowners in California. To prevent fraud, regularly review your property records and monitor any changes in your title. Be cautious of suspicious activities, like receiving unfamiliar loan offers or unexpected legal notices. If you suspect fraud, act quickly by contacting your title company and a real estate attorney. The sooner you identify fraudulent transfers, the better your chances of stopping further damage. Keeping track of any changes and maintaining clear communication with your legal team can help protect your assets from fraudulent transfers.
If you discover that someone has fraudulently transferred your property title, take immediate action. Start by contacting the county recorder's office to verify the transfer and obtain copies of all relevant documents. Notify your mortgage lender and any financial institutions involved to prevent further unauthorized transactions. Next, file a fraud report with local law enforcement and seek the guidance of an attorney specializing in real estate fraud. Legal remedies may include reversing the fraudulent transfer, recovering assets, and holding the responsible parties accountable. Be proactive in protecting your property to minimize further harm.
Notarization plays a vital role in ensuring the authenticity and legality of real estate documents. Proper notarization prevents fraudulent activity by verifying the identity of the signer and confirming that they willingly entered into the agreement. Ensure that the notary follows all California laws, including the proper completion of notarial certificates and maintaining accurate records. Inaccurate or improper notarization can lead to costly legal disputes or even title fraud. Always choose a reputable notary and ensure they comply with all requirements to avoid the consequences of fraud or misconduct in your transactions.
If you are in need of an attorney, feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
A person charged of this crime may refute the charge by making a legal argument. A strong defense frequently results in a charge being dropped or reduced. Please be aware, however, that in order to have the best defense possible, an accused person must retain legal counsel. There are three typical defenses put forth by the defendant:
Remember that in order to be prosecuted with a violation of Vehicle Code 14601.3, a person must be aware that their driving privileges have previously been suspended or revoked. A driver normally learns about a suspension or revocation by receiving a notice from the DMV via regular mail.
Thus, a solid defense is for a person to assert that he never received proper notice, and therefore, had no knowledge that his license was in fact suspended or revoked.
A defendant who asserts a necessity defense effectively tries to disprove his guilt by demonstrating that he had a compelling enough cause to do the offense. This defense is occasionally referred to as "guilty with an explanation." An accused person facing allegations of habitual traffic offenses may try to prove that he was forced to drive with a license that was suspended or revoked or commit a moving infraction (e.g., because of an emergency).
Accidents and traffic violations frequently occur rapidly. As a result, it can be quite challenging to locate eyewitnesses who can support accusations made under VC 14601.3. This may result in erroneous identifications of offenders and fraudulent arrests. Therefore, charges should be dropped if the prosecution cannot establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime or was the cause of the accident.
Depending on how many convictions the defendant has under Vehicle Code 14601.3, they may be subject to additional penalties for habitual traffic offenders. After their initial conviction, a defendant gets:
Any subsequent offense that occurs within seven years of a prior conviction, or a second conviction, results in:
Charges concerning habitual traffic offenders are connected to the following offenses:
Call our law office for a free consultation if you or someone you know has been charged with breaking California Vehicle Code 14601.3. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
In most lawsuits against nursing homes and/or its personnel, the plaintiff must establish three things:
Your California injury lawyer will typically need to file a lawsuit in order to gain "discovery" of the nursing home's records and information in order to prove the case. Your lawyer will analyze the case file, speak with prospective witnesses, and, if practical, the victim directly. Attorney may try to negotiate a settlement with the perpetrator outside of court because a trial can drag on for several years(s). If negotiation can't reach a fair settlement, a jury trial will be deciding the outcome of the nursing home lawsuit. Your attorney may ask the court for an injunction in addition to damages.
Investigations of elder abuse in California nursing homes involve a number of entities. An older patient who wants to file a complaint or a friend or family member usually do so with their neighborhood ombudsman's office. The "ombudsman" is a representative for persons residing in long-term care homes . The California Department of Aging is running The Ombudsman program in this state. The Ombudsman launches an investigation after receiving a report of elder mistreatment in a care facility. Any or all of the following topics may be discussed by the local ombudsman:
In most cases, the ombudsman will go to the nursing facility in question and conduct an on-site investigation. The California Department of Public Health receives the complaint if the Ombudsman determines after conducting its inquiry that it is a valid one. Following its investigation, this agency may:
If the individual filing the report of suspected elder abuse at a nursing home is a mandated reporter, s/he must file the report with both the local office of the ombudsman and a local police enforcement agency. Those who are required by law to report any suspected nursing home abuse are known as "mandated reporters". Nursing home staff and managers are required to be reporters.
Contact legal counsel right now. Your legal team needs time to build a strong case and conduct depositions since civil actions in California have a stringent statute of limitations. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
Typically, only living people can sue for invasion of privacy, which requires proof that public disclosure of a private fact has taken place. To prove this, it is necessary to establish five elements:
Public disclosure of information includes bringing information to the attention of the general public or a large group of people. A private fact is a detail of your life that is usually not open to others, such as your finances, sexual activity, or your health. When disclosure violates commonly held norms of decency, it is offensive to the typical individual. The disclosure that does not cause legitimate public concern is a disclosure that has no social value but deeply violates a person's privacy. Finally, demonstrating a reckless lie requires demonstrating that the defendant knew how offensive it would be to reveal private facts but did so anyway.
You may be hesitant to disclose a breach of your privacy due to feelings of vulnerability or even humiliation. However, remember that invasion of privacy is a felony that, like any other crime, must be prosecuted. Privacy invasions can range from innocuous to deadly, but no matter how serious they are, reporting them to the appropriate authorities as soon as possible is the best course of action. The consequences of defamation can be as serious as personal injury. As a result you deserve justice for the pain and embarrassment you are experiencing or did in the past.
If you or someone you know is subject to privacy invasion and have further issues, contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. If you have any questions please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
Which motorist was at fault in a car accident typically determines who was at fault. A driver may be held accountable for an accident if they run a red light and collide with another vehicle. What transpires, though, if a police officer runs a red light and strikes another motorist? Injury claims for those struck by police cars depend on the circumstances surrounding the incident and the driver's actions. The injured party may be entitled to seek compensation from the city or county for their damages if the police officer is found to have been negligent. If a driver breaks a traffic rule and causes an accident as a result, the driver may be labile . Emergency vehicles are, however, occasionally exempt from regular traffic restrictions under California's "emergency vehicle exemption" law.
The officer must be reacting to an emergency in order to be excluded from some traffic restrictions. An officer who is:
A police officer does not have the right to argue that since they are officers. They are exempt from following the law. When an officer is returning from a call or using his or her own vehicle when there is no emergency, it is not regarded as an emergency.
Even if a police officer was responding to an emergency while driving with lights and sirens on, the officer may still have been culpable in causing the collision. According to California's negligence statutes, the negligent party is responsible for any harm and losses brought on to any motorists, passengers, or pedestrians involved in the collision. Driving negligently is not adhering to the obligation of care. Drivers, including police personnel, must adhere to the following standards of care:
Compared to typical automobile accident claims, police car accidents are significantly more complicated. Hiring the best personal injury attorney will allow the injured victims and their families to feel secure knowing they are in skilled hands rather than attempting to manage a catastrophic accident claim alone. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
The fact that the employer is strictly accountable for any harassment, regardless of the manner, is the most crucial concept to comprehend. If the victim's supervisor or a person with ever higher authority (for instance, the supervisor's supervisor) was responsible. This indicates that it did not matter if it took appropriate action to stop the harassment from occurring. If an employee sues, claiming that their supervisor harassed them, the employer may still be liable for damages.
If an employee is experiencing harassment by non a supervisor, they may still take their employers to court under the Fair Employment and Housing Act. (This refers to hostile workplace harassment rather than sexual harassment for financial gain.) The employer is only liable in a workplace harassment lawsuit if the company was negligent. The following two conditions therefore need to be met:
This kind of litigation will center on whether the employer took action to stop harassment in the workplace. Another issue is how the company handled reports of harassment or other warning indicators. To the extent that the harassing behavior may have been clear to anybody in authority, the employer shall know about it. If this is the case, harassment is still illegal even if the victim does not disclose it. The employer must act quickly to halt it or they run the danger of being found negligent.
When an employee is experiencing harassment by a customer or client of the firm, particularly a significant one, whether it be sexual or otherwise, a difficult scenario occurs. The employer's natural impulse is to appease and appease the client or customer in order to keep their business. But it would be foolish to act on this instinct in light of California harassment law and the FEHA. Similar to how it would be for sexual harassment committed by a coworker, an employer is liable for third-party harassment if its conduct contributed to the harassment. Negligence is when an employer fails to take the necessary corrective action while knowing or having a duty to know about the harassment. All employers who are aware that their employees are experiencing harassment by clients, customers, or independent contractors must address the hostile work environment this produces. This is true even in circumstances when sexual harassment would appear to be almost certain (such as when a woman works in a jail for men).
Do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions about workplace harassment by supervisors and non-supervisors. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
If a BUI suspect fails a chemical breath test or a blood test within three hours of driving the boat, California law presumes that they have an illegal BAC level. Defendants, on the other hand, can challenge this presumption in court. Evidence that the breathalyzer was faulty or that the blood samples were tainted, for example, might invalidate the chemical test results.
A person is considered to be under the influence, if, as a result of drinking and/or consuming alcohol, taking drugs, his/her mental or physical abilities are so impaired that he/she is no longer able to drive a vehicle (vessel) with a caution of a sober person, using ordinary care, under similar circumstances. In other words, the influence of alcohol and drugs on your organism shall be so essential that it shall cause you:
For instance, suppose you drank some beer while operating a boat, but you are a professional driver and the drink has no effect on the boat's performance. They won't find you guilty of violating California's Harbor and Navigation Code § 655 (b). However, the case will be different if you are a new driver of a vessel, and the percentage of alcohol in your blood can easily lead to operating the boat worse than usual. The prosecution considers a number of variables when determining whether you are under the influence of alcohol or drugs. These factors are:
Under this subsection, it is illegal to:
This subsection differs from the one previously discussed. In case your abilities to drive your boat were not under effect of the alcohol concentration in your blood. However, the test is revealing that it was 0.08 percent or higher, it can be illegal.
The actions, considered to be offenses under this section, are:
The level of caused bodily injury does not play a role in accusing the person of a violation of this subsection. To understand when you can be convicted for violation of this subsection, let's consider the following example. If you operate your boat faster than the speed limit in the region while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. You may be found guilty of violating the relevant provision if your friend falls and fractures her hand as a result of your actions. You can try to prove that you were not under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or their combination while committing the unlawful act or neglecting the duty. The above mentioned can help to mitigate the penalties.
The violations are variable thus it is essential to find a professional attorney to assist you in defense against the penalties. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
To better understand Penal Code 245 (a) (4), we need to break down its essential components. The primary elements that define this assault charge include:
This section focuses on the potential for severe injury rather than the injury itself, making it different from other assault charges that may not involve the same degree of harm.
A crucial element that distinguishes this form of assault from others is the concept of "great bodily injury" (GBI). Great bodily injury refers to substantial or significant harm that severely impacts the victim's physical well-being. This can include:
The court will evaluate whether the injury qualifies as "great" based on various factors, including the severity of pain, the necessity for immediate medical care, and the long-term impact on the victim’s life. Minor or moderate injuries that do not result in major physical harm will not meet the threshold for great bodily injury.
It’s important to note that financial losses or emotional trauma do not qualify as great bodily injury under the law, as the term specifically refers to physical harm.
Assault by means likely to produce great bodily injury can include both as felony and misdemeanor under California Law. Depending on the facts of the case, the classification and sanctions may differ. The accused's criminal background, as well as the consequences of his or her actions. In the event that the actions are classified as a misdemeanor. The maximum penalty may be up to one year in county jail or a fine of not more than $10,000. If the crime is a felony, the penalties may include imprisonment in state prison for two, three, or four years.
An essential element for this type of assault is that the actions are likely to cause great bodily injury. Thus, the accused can prove that the possibility of great bodily injuries occurring was little. For example, if one threw an item at a victim who had little weight, the person couldn't sustain injuries from this action. Another way to defend against the penalties is by proving that the actions were conducted in self-defense. In this case, the act was willful, but there was no intent to cause great bodily injury to anyone.
These are possibilities in theory that can help with your defense, however, it is essential to have a professional lawyer to assist you and try to mitigate the penalties. If you have any questions, contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.