Stay updated with the latest legal news, expert analysis, and firm updates from KAASS LAW.
Whether you're facing a legal challenge or seeking proactive counsel, our award-winning team is ready to defend your interests.
Sextortion is a serious crime in which a perpetrator threatens to publish private and explicit information or material about you (or to share it with your friends and family) unless you comply with their demands. The demand for sexual images, money, or sexual favors is common. The goal of a sextortionist is to make you fear that he will share your private photos or videos online for all of your friends, family, and coworkers to see. Criminals use your fear to force you to pay them in exchange for not releasing your personal photos, videos, or other media. Starting from 2018 California Penal Code amended the law on the criminalization of extortion and added points with regards to "sextortion" crime.
Sextortion is a type of extortion that encompasses a wide range of behaviors. Sextortion, on the other hand, differs from most other forms of extortion in that it frequently involves threats of revealing the victim's personal, intimate images or videos if individual will not pay. The crime of extortion is defined as:
Some sextortionists, on the other hand, use something as simple as a text message with your text messages and phone number. Victims who are in a monogamous relationship may find this information to be compromising.
Under California's extortion law, Penal Code 518, "sextortion" is a type of blackmail. The term "extortion" is defined in California law. Sextortion is defined by obtaining:
In other words, sextortion is a form of extortion in cases in which the perpetrator threatens the victim to release information (mostly concerning intimate information on the victim) demanding money, or sexual favors, personal media.
The fear of the victim that particular explicit information on him/her made public is the base of sextortion. So, the fear of the victim can affect him/her to make paying money or demanding other sexual favors. Examples of acts of sextortion are webcam blackmail, web sextortion, etc. Most social media websites (such as Facebook, Instagram, skype zoom, etc) enable us to chat with video cameras and, of course, send photos and videos. That is a convenient place for the harassers to find a potential victim. Of course, the crime cannot happen immediately; first, the harasser shall win the victim's trust, build relationships and then threaten to release compromises. Another convenient platform for the harasser is dating websites (Tinder, Match, etc). People, who often use such websites, are more vulnerable to share personal photos and media, or other information.
Avoiding sending explicit content to anyone else via phone, tablet, or computer is the easiest way to avoid sextortion. When someone asks you to send intimate photos or videos online, keep your wits (and a healthy dose of skepticism) about you. Sending intimate photos or video-chatting with someone you haven't met in person is not a good idea. Some examples of helpful tips can be:
If you are being sextorted on the internet, then you may be entitled to compensation. If that is the case, contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
Assault can take many forms under California law. However, one particularly dangerous and disturbing type is assault with caustic chemicals. This offense involves someone deliberately attempting to harm another person by throwing or placing harmful substances, such as acids or flammable liquids, on their body. Because these acts often result in serious physical and emotional trauma, the law takes them very seriously.
Under California Penal Code Section 244, assault with caustic chemicals occurs when someone willfully and maliciously throws, places, or causes a caustic chemical, corrosive substance, flammable material, or vitriol to come into contact with another person with the intent to injure or disfigure them.
The term caustic chemicals includes substances capable of burning or corroding human tissue. Common examples include:
Workplace violence can take many forms, and one of the most troubling is coworker assault. Whether it involves verbal threats, physical intimidation, or actual bodily harm, assault by a coworker is both a serious legal matter and a violation of workplace safety standards. In California, victims of coworker assault have multiple legal avenues to seek justice and financial compensation.
Coworker assault refers to an intentional act by a fellow employee that causes you to fear imminent physical harm or results in actual physical contact. California law defines assault as an attempt or threat to injure someone. For example, if a coworker screams at you and threatens to throw a heavy object, even if they don’t follow through, you may still have a valid claim under assault laws.
Workplace violence, especially when unaddressed, creates a toxic environment that can affect employee well-being, morale, and productivity. Victims often suffer from emotional trauma, stress, and physical injuries, which is why it’s crucial to take appropriate legal steps immediately.
If you’ve experienced coworker assault, here are several important actions you should consider:
Every time a driver gets behind the wheel, there is a possibility of getting into an accident. Essentially, it is a risk most people end up taking on a day-to-day basis. Nevertheless, it appears that young drivers have a higher risk of causing traffic accidents than others. According to the CDC, the risk of auto accidents is higher among teens between 16–19 than among any other age group. In fact, per mile driven, teen drivers between 16-19 are nearly three times as likely as drivers aged 20 or older to be in a fatal car accident. The number one cause for car accidents is not always as simple as speeding or drinking and driving, however, they are probable causes as well. In fact, many believe that inexperience and lack of knowledge are some of the leading causes of such accidents.
Some factors for car accidents among younger drivers include:
A defective tire has a problem in function due to a design or manufacturing flaw, a failure to warn consumers of a hazard, or someone's negligence. Victims of the crash may be able to seek compensation from the party responsible for the tire's flaws.
In California, defective tires can cause a car accident in a variety of ways. Tires provide traction, steering, and a point of contact with the road for drivers. If a tire is defective and fails while driving, the driver may lose control of the vehicle, resulting in a crash. The following are some of the most common causes:
Tread separation is a particularly common cause of a collision. The tread is the grooved section of the tire that makes contact with the road. When low-quality materials are used in the adhesion that connects the tread to the tire's steel belt, the tread can come loose. If the de-treading occurs on the road, the driver may lose control and cause a crash. If the tread separates from the tire at high speeds, the car may rollover, resulting in catastrophic injuries to the vehicle owner. A tire blowout is a well-known cause of car accidents. In these cases, it appears that the tire explodes or pops. However, a tire blowout can be caused by a variety of factors, including:
Have you ever come across news concerning a lawsuit against doctors for sexual harassment? In the latest news, there was information regarding compensation to 6600 patients by the University of California for sexual harassment of a gynecologist. The abuse included sexual inappropriate comments to patients, touching them without medical gloves, etc. Sexual assault/abuse/harassment are criminalized under California law. However, filing a lawsuit for such crimes against doctors is a personal injury claim. The claim is mostly focused on receiving compensation for the damages caused by the criminal actions of doctors rather than seeing the doctor convicted to imprisonment in jail.
The first addressee is the doctor, who caused the injury to the patient. However, a doctor's employer (hospital, clinics, college, university) can also be liable for the actions of the doctor. What is the reason to implicate the employer? It helps to increase the amount of compensation you can receive in the recovery of your damages. Mostly, the plaintiff must show that the doctor was not competent and was working negligently, as well as that the employer knew the doctor could be of a risk for the patients. Under two legal doctrines, sexual assault cases against doctors can hold the doctor's employer liable:
This article about burn injuries after using a curling wand will explore the importance of accurate product design and proper warning labels on hairstyling tools. Many people use heated hair tools regularly, especially curling wands. While these tools are useful for styling, they also pose serious burn risks. This article will explain how defective design and a lack of warnings can lead to injuries and what consumers need to know when using these products.
What exactly is a defective product? A curling wand becomes defective if any part of it poses a danger to the user due to poor design. For instance, curling wands without stands or protective features may roll off surfaces or burn users during styling. A well-designed curling wand should have a stand, a clamp, or even include a heat-resistant glove. The stand keeps it stable, the clamp helps control hair without exposing the user’s skin to extreme heat, and the glove protects the hand during use. These features reduce the risk of injury and show how design directly affects safety.
Proper labeling helps prevent accidents. When manufacturers fail to include warning labels, users might not realize the tool’s full risks. Curling wands can reach dangerously high temperatures. If someone uses the tool near their face without understanding how hot it is, they can suffer serious burns. Warning labels must inform users about heat levels, safe usage times, and precautions. When a curling wand lacks clear guidance, injuries become more likely—especially for new users. Manufacturers have a responsibility to inform and protect customers through clear, visible warnings.
Construction accidents can be some of the most dangerous accidents that people experience. This is because they are happening on a site where construction work is being done, and there are often many other people around who may also be injured in an accident. The danger level for these types of accidents increases when scaffolding collapses or faulty wiring sparks a fire. Construction sites should always have safety precautions taken to ensure that all workers are safe from injury or death.
A construction proceeding could be a due process within which a property or home-owner files a claim against a general contractor or alternative similar party for poor work quality or performance, property harm, or personal injury. However, these suits may be supported by a range of legal theories, betting on state laws, like negligence, breach of contract, and merchandise liability. Therefore, these cases are a unit referred to as construction defect claims or construction defect lawsuits in some jurisdictions. Claimants must file a construction defect lawsuit within the time period specified by their state's applicable statute of limitations. If a litigator wins a construction proceedings, he or she is also ready to recover some (or all) of the subsequent antagonistic damages such as:
Unfortunately, very commonly the children get into different types of accidents and receive different kinds of injuries. Certainly, it is possible to seek compensation for such injuries and recover the child’s rights. However, minors do not have the legal capacity for filing lawsuits and claims. It is necessary to understand who shall be responsible for filing the claim and receiving compensation. Obviously, it shall be the parent of the child who shall act on behalf of him. If the parents split up and live apart, the child's representative is the parent who has custody. In some cases, the court can appoint guardian ad litem to protect the interests of a child.
A compromise of a minor's claim occurs when a parent (guardian ad litem) settles a dispute claim for personal injury monetary damages on behalf of a child under the age of 18. Minors' rights have a special protection by the state, and as a result, the court must approve any settlement reached on their behalf. The following are some examples of claims in personal injury lawsuits:
Proposition 22 (prop 22) has passed in California, and many people are happy about this. The passing of this proposition makes app-based workers like: Uber drivers, Postmates delivery drivers, and Lyft drivers “independent contractors” instead of “employees.” This employment status grants these drivers the freedom to work at their own pace and schedule. You may be wondering why anyone would want to vote against this proposition. People believe that because these major companies like Uber and Doordash classify workers as independent contractors, they are generating more profit by creating their own tax exemptions. As individual contractors, these drivers are not entitled to any benefits like unemployment, healthcare, sick leave, etc. If you were to force these benefits onto app-based workers, they would potentially see less pay because it would cost these major companies a lot more money to provide benefits to people who work on their own time. Making someone, an employee would mean that they have a set amount of time to work to use their benefits. Therefore, the freedom of working on your time is the main attraction to app-based work.
“Independent Contractor” means you work on your own. “Employee” status would make the employer liable for all damages resulting from accidents involving their drivers. Being an independent contractor means you’re liable for your own accidents. Personal insurance coverage alone will not protect a person driving for income because it is not for personal use. To make sure you have coverage for app-based working, call your insurance provider. As a result, companies like Uber and Lyft offer their driver's liability insurance which will cover damages if the driver’s insurance denies the claim.
These chemicals are often found in industrial cleaners, automotive fluids, and other household or commercial products.
Importantly, flammable liquids are also covered under this statute. To qualify, a substance must have a flashpoint of 150°F or less, meaning it can ignite quickly and inflict serious harm when misused.
To secure a conviction under Penal Code 244, prosecutors must demonstrate four essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt. These elements, as explained in CALCRIM 877 Jury Instructions, are:
Intent is a critical factor in these cases. The law applies only when the accused deliberately uses a harmful substance to injure or disfigure another individual.
Suppose someone, trying to escape a robber, tosses a liquid to distract them. If the liquid unintentionally contains acid and injures the robber, the person may not be guilty under Section 244. There was no intent to disfigure or injure, which is a necessary element of the offense.
In contrast, imagine a woman in an argument with her neighbor throws a chemical in their face while yelling insults. If the chemical causes burns or scarring, and there’s evidence of intent to harm, prosecutors are likely to charge her with felony assault under this statute.
Because of the severe potential consequences, this offense is classified as a felony in California. Penalties include:
If probation is granted, the court may impose additional conditions such as:
Although these charges are serious, several valid defenses may apply. Some common strategies include:
If the defendant had no intention to harm or disfigure the other person, the charges may not stand. Accidental contact, even if harmful, does not satisfy the required intent.
If the accused acted to prevent imminent harm to themselves or another person, that justified use of force can be a strong defense.
Mistakes can happen. For example, if someone accidentally spilled a chemical while handling it responsibly, that does not amount to an assault.
Several other California laws may be charged alongside or instead of Penal Code 244, including:
If you’re facing a felony charge for assault with caustic chemicals, don’t wait. The stakes are high, and early legal representation can significantly impact your case outcome. A knowledgeable criminal defense attorney can evaluate the evidence, protect your rights, and advocate for the best possible resolution.
On the other hand, if you were injured by someone else’s use of caustic chemicals, you may have a valid personal injury claim. Victims often face long-term medical treatments, lost wages, and emotional trauma. The attorneys at KAASS LAW help victims seek compensation for:
Call us today at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation.
Learn more here: KAASS LAW – Glendale Personal Injury Lawyer
Assault with caustic chemicals is among the most serious forms of assault in California. Defined under Penal Code Section 244, it requires a clear intent to injure or disfigure using harmful substances. Whether you’re facing charges or were injured in such an attack, understanding the law—and taking action—can make all the difference.
Yes, in specific circumstances. Employers have a legal duty of care to maintain a safe workplace. If they neglect this duty, they can be held liable for damages caused by coworker assault. Here are two main scenarios that may support a claim against your employer:
The employer has a duty of care to establish a safe working environment, as emphasized by OSHA workplace violence prevention guidelines, and may be held liable if this duty is breached.
Filing a civil lawsuit and a criminal complaint are separate legal actions. You can pursue one without the other. However, reporting the assault to law enforcement is often beneficial, as criminal case evidence can strengthen your civil claim.
Additionally, when you report the incident, you protect yourself and other potential victims by bringing workplace violence to light. Legal professionals recommend documenting everything: save emails, messages, medical records, and any witness statements that support your case.
Victims of coworker assault may be entitled to several forms of compensation, particularly if the assault results in physical or emotional injuries. Compensation may include:
Because assault in the workplace is often considered a work-related injury, workers' compensation may also be available depending on your employer’s coverage. However, civil lawsuits allow broader damages compared to the limits of workers’ compensation.
It's important to be cautious when taking legal action against a coworker. In some cases, the accused may file a defamation counterclaim, arguing that your allegations damaged their reputation. To avoid this risk, always ensure your claims are supported by documented facts and filed in good faith.
This is another reason why professional legal support is vital. A skilled attorney will help you present your case correctly, defend against counterclaims, and pursue the maximum compensation available.
Facing workplace violence can be frightening and overwhelming. You may be unsure of your rights or how to proceed. That’s where a knowledgeable employment lawyer can make a big difference. From negotiating settlements to representing you in court, an attorney ensures that your rights are fully protected.
If you or a loved one has been assaulted by a coworker, you don't have to face it alone. At KAASS LAW, we provide compassionate and aggressive legal representation for victims of workplace violence. Our team can help you pursue justice and secure the compensation you deserve.
Call us today at (310) 943-1171 for a free, confidential consultation.
Learn more at KAASS LAW – Glendale Employment Lawyer
Coworker assault is a serious matter that should never be ignored. Whether it’s verbal threats, physical aggression, or intimidation, every employee has the right to a safe and respectful workplace. If you’ve been the victim of workplace violence, take action today. Report the incident, protect your rights, and seek help from a trusted employment lawyer.
With these factors in mind, let's understand why these four key points are leading causes of accidents involving new or younger drivers.
The idea of speeding crosses the mind of many new drivers. With the freedom to drive on their own, new and younger drivers feel the urge to test their limits. By doing so, they risk their own lives along with the lives of other drivers and pedestrians. Many people think that because they are young, they will never experience serious injuries in an accident. A concerning difficulty that parents face is their child's perception of invincibility. As a result, many new drivers speed and drive recklessly. The truth is, speeding makes it more likely to get involved in an accident and sustain an injury. This often results in greater accident rates among new and younger drivers than experienced drivers.
As we all know, driving under any sort of drug or alcohol consumption is not permitted under any circumstance. With this being said, there are still a number of drivers who go behind the wheel and get into accidents. Driving under the influence puts everyone around you at risk of being endangered. New and younger drivers frequently consume alcoholic beverages or use drugs prior to driving. Despite all the anti-drunk driving programs made to raise awareness, drunk driving is still a problem. People's perception of driving is affected when they consume alcohol before driving. The result is having slower response times and making wrong decisions, which can lead to severe personal injuries in accidents.
With technology being a very important factor in everyone's lives today, we often get distracted by them when we shouldn't be. For example, if you were to receive an urgent text at the time you are driving, would you pick up your phone to read and respond? Well, if you responded yes to that example, you are one example of a danger on the road. To avoid getting distracted from the text, wait for a clearance to pull over and reply. By doing so, you may save someone's life, better yet, maybe even yours. Texting is just one common example of getting distracted while on the road. Driving while being distracted removes the mind, eyes, and hands from our present driving.
Over time, every driver becomes aware of ways to handle their vehicle. Becoming familiar with the car, how it runs, and how you react in certain situations while driving is important things to consider. This expertise comes with practice. Let's also remember that consistently switching up cars can be dangerous due to the fact that the size, rear-view mirrors, gas, and brake pedals operate just a little differently from one vehicle to another. In simpler terms, you have to drive to become a better driver.
If you or someone you know is driving with the intention of putting everyone around them in danger, here is what you can do to help them.
If you have been in an accident with such a driver, don't be afraid to call our firm now. We can help assist you with your case. To reach our office, call 310-943-1171.
Victims injured in a car accident caused by a faulty tire can file a personal injury or products liability claim. If the accident killed the victim, the victim's loved ones can file a wrongful death claim on his or her behalf. Many victims seek compensation under California's personal injury laws. These claims require proof that someone else's negligence caused the tire problem and subsequent car accident. In order to establish negligence in California, victims must demonstrate:
If the tire was defective, the person or party who designed, manufactured, or sold it could be held liable under California's product liability laws. They may face strict liability for:
In these cases, the victim or plaintiff is not required to demonstrate that the party responsible for the defect acted negligently. It is sufficient that the defendant was responsible for the defect.
Design flaws are issues with the tire's design. A design flaw occurs when the material that holds the tread to the tire is designed to be too weak. While design flaws are uncommon, they can affect an entire tire line. This could apply to hundreds of thousands of tires on the road. In California, there are two tests that can be used to determine whether a design is defective:
Meanwhile, the risk-benefit test involves a shifting burden of proof. To begin, plaintiffs must demonstrate:
The defendant must then demonstrate that the benefits of the tire's design outweighed the risks. Among the factors are:
Manufacturing flaws are issues that arise during the tire's production. They can be widespread, such as a plant's decision to use inferior rubber during the manufacturing process, or specific to a tire, such as if a worker punctures an air tube while assembling it. In California, proving a manufacturing defect necessitates evidence of:
Motorists pursuing a strict liability case against a tire manufacturer should seriously consider forming an attorney-client relationship with a legal team of trial lawyers from a reputable law firm with a track record of obtaining favorable verdicts in accident claims. People who have suffered serious injuries in vehicle accidents as a result of a defective product can recover the compensation they require with the help of a personal injury lawyer.
Problems with how the tire is marketed are examples of warning defects. As an example, suppose a tire company claims that their brand of tire never needs to be rotated, and the lack of rotation causes uneven wear, resulting in an accident. In order to establish that the tire had a warning defect in California, plaintiffs must show:
If you have experienced a defective product, give our office a call so we can discuss further on your case. Feel free to reach us at 310.943.1171.
The main plaintiff is the patient-who suffered from the actions of the doctor. However, the victim's family members, even domestic partners, or legal heirs can also act as a plaintiff for such a lawsuit. Anyone who's been the target of one of the following offenses can sue the doctor who caused them harm:
The injury claim continues the criminal proceedings against the doctor. So, the victims of such crimes as sexual assault, rape, statutory rape, sexual battery, nonconsensual sex, touching, etc. can file for this lawsuit. In case the criminal proceedings succeed, the civil lawsuit automatically shall become easy, the civil claim can use evidence gathered during the criminal proceedings as well. One of the features of a civil claim is that the latter requires a lower standard of proof. While filing the civil claim, the victim needs to show that there were damages.
Under California law, you can file for this kind of lawsuit in 2 years period from the date of the commitment of the assault. In case the victim was assaulted while being a child, the term for filing for the civil lawsuit extends to his 26th birthday or 3 years after the discovery that the victim had a psychological illness that occurred after the victim of abuse turned 18, and that this illness was a result of that particular abuse. What compensation can the victim receive if they file the civil lawsuit? The compensation types which are possible to receive include the recovery of:
If you or a loved one has been harmed as the result of sexual assault, then you may be entitled to compensation. If that is the case, contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. A sexual assault lawsuit is an extremely complex legal process in which plaintiffs are suing doctors who was not competent at their work place. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
Many modern curling wands now come equipped with digital displays that show temperature levels. This helps users know exactly when the tool is hot enough to use, avoiding unnecessary burns. For example, Emily plugs in her curling wand to style her hair. She waits for it to heat but isn’t sure when it’s ready. She touches the barrel to check—and burns her finger. If the wand had a ready-to-use indicator or digital screen, Emily could’ve avoided injury.
Manufacturers can reduce risks with built-in features such as heat indicators, auto shut-off functions, and easy-to-understand instructions. Clear design and visible indicators play a vital role in consumer safety.
When a curling wand malfunctions or causes injury due to defective design or missing warnings, the manufacturer may be held liable. For instance, if the device overheats, lacks safety features, or catches fire, the user could suffer serious burns or property damage. In California, product liability laws allow injured consumers to seek compensation if a manufacturer failed to design the product safely or warn users properly. In such cases, working with an experienced personal injury attorney can help you recover damages for your medical bills, lost income, and pain.
As a consumer, always read the instruction manual and review any warning labels on your curling wand before use. Avoid using the product near children or while multitasking. Always place the wand on a heat-resistant surface and unplug it when not in use. When shopping, look for models that offer safety features like automatic shut-off, heat control, and anti-burn gloves. Your awareness and cautious approach can prevent accidents.
Different hair types require different heat settings. Thick, coarse hair may need higher temperatures, while fine or treated hair is more sensitive and requires lower heat. Curling wands often lack universal temperature recommendations, leaving users to guess. This adds to the risk of burns or hair damage. If your curling wand doesn’t display real-time heat levels, it may not be safe. Opt for tools that clearly show heat settings and include warnings about suitable hair types. Being informed helps you style safely without risking injury.
Have you or someone you love suffered an injury from a curling wand? Product manufacturers must take responsibility when their tools harm consumers. You may be entitled to compensation for injuries resulting from defective design or lack of warnings. KAASS LAW helps injured clients navigate California product liability laws and fight for the justice they deserve. Contact our Los Angeles office today at 310-943-1171 for a free consultation.
For more safety tips and consumer rights information, visit the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) website. This federal resource offers guidelines and recall information related to personal care appliances and curling wand safety
A plaintiff homeowner or real estate owner brings a construction case in which they sue a defendant contractor for poor workmanship, property damage, or personal injury. Plaintiffs may bring a construction dispute or legal action against, in addition to contractors:
Typically, construction litigation is based on one of the following legal claims:
The majority of construction lawsuits are based on claims of negligence. Contractors, for example, are required to use materials on job sites that meet industry standards for construction projects. If they rely on subpar materials, they are in breach of their duty. Therefore, if this breach causes property damage or physical injuries, victims may file a contract defects claim against the contractors on the basis of negligence. Plaintiffs must establish the following elements in order to succeed with these claims:
A vicarious liability claim occurs when an employer is held liable for the actions of one of its employees. Vicarious liability is a legal doctrine that holds parties indirectly liable for an injury even if they did not cause it. In California, vicariously liable parties may be held legally liable for a plaintiff's medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other losses. This is significant because the "vicariously liable" person may have more assets and insurance coverage than the person who was directly negligent or reckless.
When defective materials or machines impede construction, plaintiffs can file a products liability lawsuit against the responsible parties. Among the potential defendants are the companies responsible for a design flaw, manufacturing flaw, and/or inadequate warning flaw. Plaintiffs must demonstrate a product was defective in some way, the plaintiff used the product as it was intended to be used, the product caused the plaintiff's injuries, and the injuries resulted in monetary damages in order to succeed with these claims.
Construction contracts govern many construction projects. For example, a condominium owner and a contractor (with only a few years of experience) may enter into a contract in which the contractor agrees to remodel the owner's kitchen by a certain date and to certain specifications. If the general contractor fails to follow the terms of the contract, and this failure causes the plaintiff to suffer damages, the plaintiff can file a breach of contract claim against the contractor. In the preceding example, the contractor may have violated the contract because construction delays prevented him/her from remodeling the kitchen by the contract's deadline.
When a construction accident kills someone, the victim's family may be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit. As a result, a victim's family sues the person or entity responsible for his or her death. Damages of wrongful death may include:
There are many accidents that happen on construction sites, some of which lead to death or disability. Construction defects occur when there is an error in the design or workmanship of a building, and these defects can cause serious injury if not corrected before use. If you or someone you know has been injured in a construction accident and would like to get compensation for their accident, give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
A minor's settlement trust gives the minor, his or her family, and the courts more flexibility in how they handle the settlement assets, and it doesn't require ongoing court supervision. A trust can be written to allow a minor to revoke it when they turn 18, but if they do not do so within 30 days, the money can stay in the trust for longer. You can obtain financial compensation for your child in the form of:
The parent can ask the court to release some or all of the money sooner. However, the court will only agree to do that if it believes it is in the child's best interests. In most cases, the court will not allow the parent to keep any of the money for personal reasons. This is because the court views the money as compensation for the child, rather than for the parent's financial gain.
The information highlighted in the petition of the court shall include all details which are necessary for the agreement to be settle. Usually, they are:
A compromise hearing usually takes place in which the minor and the guardian ad litem shall be present. examination of the injuries will determine if the Court approves or denies the petition of settlement. Besides, the Court also takes into account where the funds of the settlement shall be transferred to in case and after the court approves the petition of settlement.
For the last point, the Court usually uses the method of blocked accounts. The account that has a ban is a bank account which will receive the funds of compensation. It is possible to use the funds only when the minor gets 18 years old. However, in some exceptional situations, the funds can be released from this account only by the order of the court. If a child received any disabilities as the result of the accident, the court is entitled to impose a special need trust to protect the assets of the child. When the child becomes an adult and is unable to work, the special needs trust shall maintain the assets of the child and also assist the child to receive public benefits as an adult.
If you or a loved one has been harmed as the result of an accident, then you may be entitled to compensation. If that is the case, contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
Like all other accidents, we recommend taking the following steps:
Listing their drivers as “independent contractors” gives major companies like Uber a cushion to fall on. The argument is that the drivers are independent and work independently; Uber cannot be held liable for their driver’s negligence. Although this is an argument the companies can make, it isn’t always set in stone. California’s 2020 AB5 law protects app-based drivers by making it difficult for companies like Uber to deny their status as employees within that business entity. Your attorney may seek compensation from the major company as a last resort if the driver’s insurance denies coverage.