Stay updated with the latest legal news, expert analysis, and firm updates from KAASS LAW.
Whether you're facing a legal challenge or seeking proactive counsel, our award-winning team is ready to defend your interests.
A minors' compromise and release hearing is required by California law if a child under the age of eighteen is injured and receives a monetary settlement from the at-fault party. This means that a guardian must be appointed by the court unless the child is legally emancipated, a judge must approve the settlement for your injured child, and the settlement funds must generally be deposited into a blocked account in any FDIC-insured bank, trust company, savings and loan associate, or similar financial institution located in the state of California, until the child is eighteen years of age. The settlement funds can also be invested in a vehicle like an insurance annuity contract (single-premium deferred annuity). Alternatively, you can have a portion of the funds deposited in a bank and a portion of the funds deposited in an investment vehicle. Please see other articles on this website for more information, or your child's injury lawyer can explain which method is best for depositing settlement funds.
According to California Probate Code Sections 2504,90 3500,91 3600,92 and California Code of Civil Procedure Section 372.93, an enforceable settlement of a child's injury case can only be consummated with California court approval. The whole point of a court-supervised settlement for injured minors in California is to: Appoint a guardian to assist the minor child in monitoring his or her settlement funds.
In California, the court process is the best way to approve and monitor a bodily injury settlement for a minor. After the court approved their child’s injury settlement and deposited the funds into a bank account, parents approached me to petition the judge for an early release of part of the funds that didn’t directly benefit the minor. Some parents forget that California’s court process exists to protect the child’s interests because the settlement funds belong to the child. Courts will allow an early release of funds, but they closely scrutinize such requests and require that the money benefit the minor directly.
Courts supervise minor settlements in California to ensure that children receive full protection under the law. Judges appoint guardians, evaluate the fairness of settlement terms, and oversee fund distribution. This process ensures that parents, insurance companies, or other parties do not misuse the minor’s funds. The courts take an active role in protecting a child’s financial interests until they turn eighteen. Without this safeguard, many minors could lose access to money that was rightfully theirs. The legal system prioritizes the child’s well-being above all else and aims to prevent financial exploitation or irresponsible use of settlement proceeds.
At a minor’s compromise hearing, the court reviews all settlement documents and hears from the guardian and attorneys involved. The judge examines the proposed settlement amount, attorney fees, and any medical liens or expenses. If the judge finds the settlement fair and in the best interest of the child, they approve it. Once approved, the funds move into a blocked account or annuity. Parents and guardians must present clear justification for any early withdrawal requests. Judges often ask questions to ensure that the settlement truly benefits the minor. They also check that the agreement complies with California Probate Code and Civil Procedure requirements.
Parents must gather key documents and understand the legal steps before attending a minor’s settlement hearing. They should consult with a personal injury attorney to file the proper paperwork, including a petition for approval and financial documentation. Courts expect parents or guardians to fully explain how they will use and safeguard the funds. Parents should also discuss blocked account options or annuity investments with financial advisors. Courts want to see responsible planning to protect the minor’s future. Preparing thoroughly not only helps ensure a smooth court process but also builds trust with the judge, increasing the likelihood of approval.
For more information on California’s court procedures for minor settlements, visit the California Courts Self-Help Center on Minor's Compromise.
If the monetary settlement is less than $5,000, California Probate Code Sections 3611(d), 94, and 340195 have routinely allowed custodial parents to manage the settlement funds directly on behalf of their minor children, avoiding the need for court approval. In fact, all of California's major insurance carriers routinely waive minors' compromise and release hearings when the settlement amount to the injured child is less than $5,000.
Judges do not require court approval for settlements under $5,000. Judges can choose to place the minor child's funds in a blocked account with court-approved withdrawals. They may also order direct payment to the custodial parent(s).
Are you looking for an attorney to help you with your case? Look no further, Kaass Law will be able to provide you great experience, knowledge and satisfaction. Fell free to call our office at 310.943.1171.
A rollover accident is when a vehicle's momentum causes it to turn over. Rollovers can result in catastrophic injuries that can be life-threatening. Rollovers are more likely to happen during the winter months because of low tire pressure, black ice, and wet roads. Nobody expects their automobile to flip, and there are few things to be aware of if it does.
While any vehicle can roll over, vehicles with a high center of gravity, such as SUVs, pickup trucks, and vans, are far more likely to do so. The majority of rollovers are "tripped" rollovers, which occur when the vehicle is destabilized by an external force. A vehicle can be tripped in a variety of ways, including:
In California, victims of police misconduct, brutality, or excessive force can file a lawsuit. Typically, the lawsuit is based on civil rights violations. The victim may be awarded monetary damages in the lawsuit. It can also seek an injunction to prevent future wrongdoing. Also, it's possible that the officer will face criminal charges as a result of this.
The term "police misconduct" refers to police officers who engage in illegal or inappropriate behavior. Discrimination, obstruction of justice, and other forms of police misconduct are examples of misconduct. Police misconduct is the illegal behavior of police officers, which takes various forms such as:
Multidistrict litigation (MDL) is the process of simplifying complicated civil actions that emerge out of the same line of activity by consolidating them into a single federal district court for preliminary hearings, such as mass tort cases and products liability claims.
Only civil lawsuits filed in federal court have the option of multidistrict litigation (MDL). One comparison is drawn between criminal and civil proceedings. Person who has suffered harm in a civil case. A claim is made against the person or thing who has done it; this person is also known as the plaintiff. The goal of civil lawsuits is to recover damages for the plaintiff's losses. These cases may occur in federal court rather than state court if either of the following applies:
In California, school attendance is a legal requirement. Parents or guardians must ensure their children attend school regularly, and failing to do so can result in serious legal consequences. If you're unsure about what qualifies as truancy and whether you could face prosecution for your child's absences, this guide will help clarify California's truancy laws, penalties, and defenses for parents.
California's Education Code outlines the rules surrounding truancy. A truant student is a child who has missed:
A chronic truant is a student who misses more than 10% of the school year without a valid excuse. For example, if a child misses more than 18 days during a 180-day school year, they are considered chronically truant.
For more information, check out the California Department of Education’s Truancy Guidelines.
It's natural to feel stress and confusion of what to do after receiving an injury in a car accident or other type of accident. You may be coping with financial hardship in addition to the physical and emotional effects of your injury. Many people have lost income as a result of their inability to work, while also facing mounting medical expenditures. Therefore, if someone else's negligence caused the accident, you may be able to hold them liable for the financial losses.
It's a legal principle that's been around for centuries. Its goal is to safeguard persons who was received injures in car accidents. If a person is hurt, they are able to get all of the money they need as soon as possible. If a third party compensates said person, it should have no bearing on what the plaintiff pays. The rule performs two functions. The evidential function is the first one. Simply put, it is a rule that implicates the rules of evidence and ensures that the defendant will not be able to bring up third-party payments made to the plaintiff. The substantive function is the second. This pertains to a person's civil rights and obligations, as well as the victim's right to recover the damages. In other words, just because a victim has received compensation from a third party does not indicate that it will lessen their losses.
Being an accessory after the fact is illegal under Penal Code 32 PC. Its definition is knowingly harboring, concealing, or assisting a felon in order to keep them from being under the arrest. This is a crime that carries a maximum sentence of three years in state prison.
Under the legal regulations, accessory after the fact means the person who “harbored, concealed or aided" the person who committed the felony to assist him to escape punishment. As a result, the presence of the following factors must be present in order to understand when one can be guilty for committing this violation:
It is highly dangerous work to deal with asbestos and underground tank works, which can cause big property damages and serious health injuries if not done correctly. A person (including a licensed contractor) who performs asbestos-related work without certification, or who installs or removes an underground storage tank without certification, is in violation of California's Business and Professions Code 7028.1 BPC.
Asbestos is a high heat resistant fibrous silicate mineral. An underground tank is "a tank and or any underground piping which is connected to the tank, and at least 90 percent of the combined volume of which is underground." Such tanks are usually used to store petroleum and other similar materials. California Business and Professional Code, with its section 7028.1, makes it a crime for a contractor to perform the following actions:
Cycling is a popular and eco-friendly choice in California, offering benefits like avoiding traffic, improving fitness, and reducing your carbon footprint. It also serves as an alternative for people who want to avoid the dangerous combination of alcohol or drugs with driving. While bicycles are not motor vehicles under California law, cyclists must still follow specific regulations, including those about cycling while intoxicated. Understanding these laws is crucial for anyone planning to ride their bike under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
In California’s cycling laws, a bicycle is any human-powered vehicle with one or more wheels, typically propelled by pedaling. It includes bikes powered by gears, chains, or belts. However, motorized bikes or mopeds are not considered bicycles. These bikes are subject to the same DUI laws as motor vehicles, so if you're riding one, you must follow the same alcohol and drug restrictions as drivers.
According to California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 21200.5, a refers to any public road or street, but not freeways. Bicycles are generally not allowed on freeways. Cyclists must stay on permissible roads and avoid restricted areas like freeways.
A quitclaim deed is unlike any other deed. It's a quick and simple form that can be completed in minutes to transfer real estate properties. However, despite their numerous benefits, quitclaims are not appropriate for every real estate transaction. These deeds, however, do not guarantee that the seller has any interest in the property at all. This makes them unsuitable for regular real estate transactions.
A quitclaim deed is a quick and easy way to transfer property ownership, but it is only recommended in certain circumstances. A quitclaim deed is a legal document that transfers real estate ownership from one person to another. Quitclaim deeds are simple forms for transferring real estate interests. They are short forms that you can fill out quickly and sign in front of a notary. All that remains is to enter the buyer's and seller's names, as well as the legal description of the property. Most states, including California, require you to sign in front of a notary.
Don't be swayed by the quitclaim's ease of use and invite it into every real estate transaction. Because it transfers all of one person's interest in the property to another, a quitclaim deed is quick and simple. On the other hand, it makes no guarantees about what that interest might be. The deed transfers any claims the seller may have to the property. If the seller has no ownership interest in the property, no ownership interest is transferred. If he owns 10%, 40%, or 80% of the property, that is what is assigned to him. A quitclaim deed also makes no guarantees regarding liens, leases, or other interests that may affect the property.
Rollover accidents are among the most dangerous types of automobile accidents. Although rollovers account for a small percentage of all passenger vehicle accidents, the consequences can be fatal. Common causes of these types of accidents include:
It's important for drivers to know how they should react if their vehicle begins to roll over so they can make sure they get out safely. Rollover accidents frequently result in partial or complete ejection of the vehicle's occupants, increasing the risk of catastrophic and fatal injuries. So, what causes rollovers? A number of these accidents happen when a driver loses control of their vehicle and it begins to slide sideways. When this happens, an object such as a curb, guardrail, or uneven ground could cause the vehicle to roll over. Rollover accidents can also occur when a driver attempts to turn the vehicle quickly. The friction between the road and the tires in such cases may cause the vehicle to tip and roll over. Rollovers involving multiple vehicles are also common. This is where one vehicle may collide with another.
A car manufacturer is frequently held liable for a rollover accident. Some vehicles are built in such a way that they are highly susceptible to rollovers. Individual vehicle components may also contribute to a rollover; for example, poor tires might make it much simpler for an impediment to create a "tripped" rollover. Furthermore, even if the rollover was not caused by the manufacturer's negligence, the injuries incurred in a rollover may be the result of the manufacturer's negligence. In the case of a rollover, a vehicle's roof should be constructed and reinforced to protect the occupants; if a manufacturer skimps on safety, the people involved could suffer far more serious injuries. Of course, the driver of the rollover vehicle's irresponsibility may also be taken into consideration. Whether it's driving at a hazardous speeds or driving while intoxicated, rollovers may result. Liability may also be from companies or governments who are in charge of upkeep in the roads. Another liable party may be the driver. Driving at high speeds or intoxicated may also be the cause of such accident. The driver's seatbelt should always be worn for safety reasons; wearing one may prevent an injury from happening if there is a rollover or collision with another car or object.
We are familiar with the complicated legal concerns that arise in rollover accidents. Your life may have been altered by the accident, and you may face new challenges in the future, but you do not have to face them alone. Hire a law firm that understands how to deal with your case. Please contact us at 310.943.1171.
These actions result in violations of the civil rights of the plaintiff, guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, such as the right of the freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures, right to privacy, etc.
The respondents are police officers, sheriffs, other officers, representing law enforcement agencies. A bright example of police brutality is the use of excessive force by the police. This misconduct usually happens when the police try to arrest someone. As to the law, the police can use force during an arrest, however, only such force is reasonably necessary for the arrest. Taking into account the fact that the victim can run away from the police, can resist, etc. On a case-by-case basis, courts consider whether the use of force was reasonable and proportionate to the arrest, or whether the use of force surpasses the necessary and desirable threshold.
Though we live in a developed society of the 21st century, racial profiling can still be an issue. Everyone enjoys equal protection under the law and racial profiling cannot serve as a ground to suspect people of committing a crime. A person can file a lawsuit against the police officer if he proves that the unlawful detention, searches or seizures, or other actions conducted by the police officer were based on racial profiling.
An arrest is when someone's freedom of movement is intentionally restricted. The person is forced to stay or go somewhere against his will as a result of the deprivation. A false arrest occurs when a peace officer has no legal authority to make an arrest. False arrests are a violation of the victim's right to due process under the Fourth Amendment. False imprisonments are another name for them. They may occur when:
Without a warrant, some victims are detained. In these situations, the officer must demonstrate that he or she had probable cause. This necessitates demonstrating that there was reasonable cause to believe the person arrested had committed one of the following crimes:
Other arrests are made on the basis of a warrant. Even if the warrant was invalid, these could still be false arrests.
If the police officer found evidence during the misconduct (for example, during unlawful seizures and searches), the plaintiff can ask the court to exclude such evidence from the case. Other types of claims are possible to file against the police officer. The plaintiff can file a section 1983 claim or Biven’s lawsuit against the police.
Section 1983 claims can be filed for violations done under color of law, which means, conducted acts are legitimized by and are related to the role of the officer. Such lawsuits can be filed to receive such remedies as compensation for caused monetary damages or injunction by the court. Biven's claim is quite similar to the section 1983 lawsuit. However, it can be filed against such federal actors as DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency) FBI officers.
Contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
A number of problems would arise if each victim were to pursue their own claim due to the actions of one defendant. The injuries resulting by hundreds of people from various locations could be due to the following:
Congress established a statute allowing judges to combine these claims in multidistrict litigation in order to avoid these issues.
Personal injury cases that share numerous facts yet included victims from different locations across the nation are consolidated into one federal district court through the MDL process for all pretrial proceedings. These preliminary hearings consist of:
The matter is back to the district court if it does not resolve during these pretrial proceedings.
MDLs and class actions have some similarities, but they also differ significantly. What matters most is:
Multidistrict litigation will alter the course of your case in several significant ways if you choose to pursue a personal injury claim through it. However, not all of them will have an effect on the resolution of your case or your capacity to obtain the just recompense. The estrangement experienced as a result of MDL is the primary distinction. The fact that your case will be heard thousands or perhaps hundreds of kilometers away may make you feel disconnected from the proceedings. However, by, for instance, preparing for and participating in a deposition, this can also lessen the amount of time you will need to spend on it personally. However, there are key distinctions between a typical personal injury case and an MDL that might affect the result. While some of these favor plaintiffs, others benefit defendants. Multidistrict litigation has another significant distinction in that settlements are frequently much more common than in typical personal injury claims. This is particularly valid if your claim is a tag-along claim rather than one of the MDL's initial filings. In an MDL, these first claims frequently result in bellwether trials.
The majority of personal injury lawsuits are significantly less complicated than multidistrict litigation. The personal injury attorneys in Glendale can assist you. Calling our office is always welcome at 310.943.1171.
If parents or guardians fail to supervise their child’s school attendance, they could face severe legal penalties.
Under Penal Code 270.1, parents can face charges if they fail to ensure their child attends school. The law applies to children aged 6 or older, enrolled in kindergarten through eighth grade. The penalties for this violation include:
Additionally, if a child’s absenteeism leads to more serious legal issues, parents may face charges under Penal Code 272, which deals with contributing to a minor’s delinquency.
A child who skips school may also face criminal charges for related offenses, such as:
These charges show how truancy can lead to more serious legal problems.
To prosecute a parent for truancy, certain criteria must be met. The child must be a chronic truant, and the parent must have failed to supervise their child’s school attendance adequately. However, California law offers a few defenses for parents.
Parents can defend themselves by demonstrating reasonable efforts to supervise their child’s school attendance. For example, they may show they communicated with the school, arranged transportation, or addressed issues that caused the absenteeism.
If the child’s absences do not qualify as chronic truancy, this can serve as a defense. Parents can dispute the school’s attendance records or provide evidence that the child’s absences were excused.
If a confession was obtained through improper police conduct, parents may argue that the confession was coerced. If proven, the court could exclude the confession from evidence or drop the case entirely.
Schools often try to intervene before pursuing legal action. Parents and students typically receive:
In persistent truancy cases, schools may recommend alternative educational programs or offer counseling services to prevent further legal action.
California’s truancy laws require children to attend school, and parents must ensure their children comply. Failing to do so can lead to legal penalties, but parents can use several defenses. Schools try to help families before resorting to legal action by providing support and resources.
If you are concerned about truancy or facing prosecution, contact KAASS LAW for expert legal guidance. We are here to help you navigate these complex issues.
📞 Call 310.943.1171 to schedule a consultation.
The collateral source rule states that any compensation received by an accident victim from a source other than the defendant in a personal injury case cannot be deducted from the defendant's final award. There are essentially two things that result from the collateral source rule, which are as follows:
An example of those evidence includes:
Yes, there are two exceptions to the collateral source rule, which are as follows:
Yes, subrogation clauses inserted in policy contracts of insurance companies may be an issue for purposes of the collateral source rule. The reason why is because a subrogation clause can help an insurance company recover the costs of the benefits it has paid the plaintiff after an accident.
Contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
Let’s examine the following situation. In case you hide me in your house after I come and announce that I killed my colleague and lie to the police the next day that you have not seen me, you shall violate Section 32 of the California Penal Code. Other violation will be if you hide the gun by which I shot my colleague. Thus, hiding and/or destroying evidence, concealing the criminal, providing a false alibi, or any other assistance, are examples of actions that an “accessory after the fact” can commit.
Aider or abettor of the crime is one who participates in the crime with the perpetrator. Let’s examine the following situation. You can aider/abettor of the crime if me and you made a pact to murder a third person and you gave me a ride and also gave me the instrument of the crime. The distinction is that you were aware of the crime and had a role to play in it. In the case of Section 32 you became aware of the murder after it had occurred and aided me afterward.
Failure to reveal the crime generally means refusing to give any information about the crime. For example, in case you did not assist me the evening when I committed the crime of killing my colleague, and in the morning refused to tell anything about the crime to the police, this will not mean that you violated Section 32. Even if you were a witness of the crime and failed to speak about it this does not make you a perpetrator-you will be a mere bystander. Thus, while failing to provide any information has no negative implications, in order to be guilty, a person must knowingly help the criminal after the latter has violated the law.
A prosecutor has the option of charging the accessory after the fact with either a felony or a misdemeanor. Depending on the details of the case and the individual's criminal background. In both circumstances, the maximum penalties is $5,000. If the violation is a crime, you can spend up to three years in state prison. If you commit a misdemeanor, you can spend up to a year in a country jail.
In case you or your friend have been convicted for violation of the above mentioned legal regulations, then you may be entitled to compensation. Contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
According to the text of the law, it does not matter whether you are a licensed or a non-licensed contractor; you shall be certified to conduct the works mentioned above, as your license does not automatically enable you to conduct asbestos-related or underground tank works.
The above-mentioned section is a misdemeanor. In case you commit the violation for the first time, it can result in:
If you violate the relevant section for the second or subsequent time, this can lead to:
In accordance with the aforementioned sanctions, the judge has the authority to grant probation to the defendant.
Under the California Business and Professional Code, among the related offenses is contracting without a license under section 7028 of the Code. The relevant section makes it a crime for the person to:
The offense is a misdemeanor offense and has these charges:
There are several defenses you can raise to protect yourself from further penalties under the relevant section. Examples of such defenses will be if you were not a contractor while performing the forbidden actions. This means you have not entered into a contract to perform these activities. This defense may work as section 7028.1 applies only to contractors. It can also be if you have not committed the actions knowingly. For example, you touched upon asbestos in the middle of the performance of other types of work, you performed actions not understanding that you are currently dealing with the mentioned material. You can also use types of such defenses as proving that the police applied overbearing measures to coerce you into confession, with the help of which the judge may exclude the confession from other evidence. It is also possible to try to prove that you are falsely accused of violating section 7208.1 of the California Business and Professional Code.
When dealing with hazardous materials such as asbestos and underground storage tanks, it’s critical to understand the legal requirements in California. The certification ensures that workers have the knowledge and skills necessary to handle these dangerous substances safely, preventing health risks and property damage. Certification also guarantees compliance with state laws, which aim to protect workers, property owners, and the environment. Without proper certification, individuals may face legal penalties, including fines or jail time. Thus, obtaining proper certification is not just a legal necessity but also an ethical responsibility to ensure safety.
To avoid violations under Section 7028.1, contractors must prioritize staying informed about certification requirements for asbestos and underground tank work. Ensure all employees involved in such projects are properly certified and meet the necessary safety standards. Contractors should regularly review the latest regulations and training opportunities to maintain compliance. Additionally, it’s crucial to avoid unlicensed work, as operating outside of these boundaries can lead to severe legal consequences. A proactive approach can help prevent penalties, fines, and potential jail time while ensuring safety and legal integrity in all projects.
Note that it is essential to have a good defense to mitigate or even dismiss a charge against you. Contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
Yes, it is illegal to cycle intoxicated in California. This law applies if you are under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or both. Under California Vehicle Code Section 21200.5 VC, cycling while intoxicated is prohibited on public roads, trails, and highways. Cycling intoxicated is considered a misdemeanor and carries penalties.
Cycling while intoxicated can impair your ability to ride safely, just like driving under the influence. If you can’t control your bicycle or navigate traffic due to alcohol or drugs, the law considers you “under the influence” and holds you accountable for your actions.
Cycling while intoxicated is a misdemeanor in California. If convicted, you face:
To secure a conviction, prosecutors must prove three key elements:
Yes, California law treats cyclists similarly to motor vehicle drivers on public roads or highways. If you're cycling intoxicated, you face the same Driving Under the Influence (DUI) laws that apply to motor vehicles. Section 21200 of the California Vehicle Code requires people on bicycles to follow the same rules as vehicle drivers, including those prohibiting intoxicated driving.
California Vehicle Code Section 21200.5 extends this provision to cycling while intoxicated. So, cyclists must understand that riding while intoxicated carries penalties similar to a DUI for car drivers.
If you’re charged with cycling under the influence (DUI), several defenses could reduce or dismiss the charges. Some common legal defenses include:
You may successfully argue that you were sober at the time of the incident. Proving your sobriety can lead to the dismissal of the charges.
The law applies only to cyclists on public roads or highways, which excludes private property. If you were cycling on private property, the law doesn’t apply.
Officers need probable cause to stop and arrest you. If the officer didn’t have a valid reason or cause for the stop, this could serve as a defense to suppress evidence collected during the arrest.
California law considers any substance that impairs your ability to ride safely as intoxicating. This includes alcohol, marijuana, prescription medications, and illegal drugs like heroin or cocaine.
Unlike DUI laws, which set a clear blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit, there is no set baseline for drugs in your system. Therefore, any substance that impairs your ability to control your bike or ride safely could lead to a CUI charge.
For more details on cycling laws, visit the KAASS Law website.
If you’ve been arrested for cycling under the influence in California, it’s essential to get help from an experienced attorney. A skilled lawyer can investigate your case, challenge weaknesses in the prosecution’s evidence, and protect your rights.
An attorney can argue that you were sober, that you were not on a public road, or that the officer didn’t have probable cause to stop you. These defenses can reduce or even dismiss the charges against you.
To schedule a consultation or case review, contact KAASS Law at 310.943.1171.
There are various methods for transferring real estate title. When properly sold to a third party in a typical real estate transaction, the most common type of deed is a warranty real estate deed transfer. A warranty deed guarantees that the person transferring the property owns it and has the right to sell it. It includes buyer protections such as compensation if anyone else has superior title to the property. This type of deed guarantees that no liens, such as a mortgage, tax lien, or creditor's liens, exist on the property. When a warranty deed is signed, a title search (a search of the property's past deeds and liens) is performed to ensure the seller has good title. Title insurance is typically purchased as part of the transaction to protect the new owner in the event of a problem. After being executed, warranty deeds are always filed with the county.
Everyone wants to ensure that their loved ones are safe at all times. For the vast majority of people, this entails creating an estate plan. A comprehensive Estate Plan, such as a Trust-Based Estate Plan with Trust & Will, includes everything you need to protect your assets and loved ones both during your lifetime and after you die. When a Revocable Trustee dies, it is up to their Successor to settle their loved one's affairs and close the Trust. The Successor Trustee follows all assets, property, and heirlooms as specified in the Trust, as well as any special instructions. When someone is appointed as a Successor Trustee, they may be unsure where to begin in settling the Estate. In this guide, we'll go over the fundamentals of Revocable Trusts and the process of closing out a Trust when the Trust maker dies.
For more information on what these types of deeds entail or if you have any questions about this topic please contact our office at 310.943.1171.