Stay updated with the latest legal news, expert analysis, and firm updates from KAASS LAW.
Whether you're facing a legal challenge or seeking proactive counsel, our award-winning team is ready to defend your interests.
Under California Penal Code Section 666 petty theft with a prior is described as follows: “Every person who has been convicted of three or more times of petty theft, grand theft, auto theft, burglary, carjacking, robbery, or a felony violation resulting in serving time in jail is convicted of petty theft”. Thus for be sentenced to penalties for petty theft with a prior under PC Section 666, defendant must first had conviction of California petty theft penal code 484 and 488.
Prosecution must establish the following elements for convicting the defendant of the petty theft with a prior under Penal Code 666:
Qualifying theft crimes include: grand theft (including grand theft with a firearm) auto theft, carjacking, burglary and robbery. To get conviction of petty theft with a prior the defendant must also have a conviction for any of the below mentioned offenses, additionally to a theft crime conviction.
Prior to proposition 47, three prior convictions for different theft crimes could lead to a felony sentence of sixteen months to three years for a conviction on a new charge. But, proposition 47 has changed the law so that most of the cases with three prior theft convictions will remain misdemeanors. Exceptions are the following:
Legal defenses to California Penal Code Section 666 charges include
Intent is one of the key elements that must be proved for convicting defendant of a theft crime. In case the defendant didn’t not intent to steal the property he is not guilty of petty theft.
In case the owner of the property gave the defendant a permission to take the property, he can’t be found guilty of petty theft.
In case the property actually belonged to the defendant or if he reasonably but mistakenly believed that the property belonged to him, he is not guilty of petty theft.
Penalties for a California Penal Code Section 666 conviction include In California law petty theft with a prior conviction is a wobbler and can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the case facts and the defendant’s criminal history.
Our Glendale petty theft lawyers can help you defend your penal code 666 charges. Call our office at (310) 943-1171 or contact us via email at [email protected] to schedule a free consultation with a Glendale criminal defense attorney. Our lawyers in Glendale, Los Angeles, CA, are highly dedicated to serving to needs of our clients.
In California all drivers of TNCs (transportation network companies), such as Uber, are required to have a rideshare insurance at all times when the app is on. When the app is switched on, the Uber driver’s time is divided into three periods. Uber then decides when its insurance is applicable based on the period the accident happened. Uber's insurance coverages work different ways depending on which "period" the coverage falls under as it may impact your Uber accident claim. The rideshare app is off: The driver's personal insurance is active, which must meet California's minimum auto insurance requirements.
California law has the following minimum auto insurance requirements while rideshare app is on but the driver hasn’t been paired with a passenger.
According to California Penal Code Section 245(a)(1), assault with a deadly weapon is an unlawful attempt to cause bodily harm to another person using a weapon or using force likely to cause great bodily harm.
Prosecutor must establish the following elements to prove an allegation of assault with a deadly weapon.
Unlike battery, physical contact is not required to take place for someone to get arrested and convicted for assault.
The Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code Sections 51 and 52, provides protection from discrimination by all business establishments in California, including housing and public accommodations. The Unruh Act was designed to protect people rights from arbitrary discrimination and to guarantee their rights to equal and full access to all public accommodations.
California Civil Code Section 51(b) defines the regulations under the Unruh Civil Rights Act: “All persons within the jurisdiction of this state are free and equal, and no matter what their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, or sexual orientation are entitled to the full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments of every kind whatsoever.”
While the Unruh Civil Rights Act specifically indicates discrimination based on “sex, race, religion, age, color, national origin, ancestry, medical condition, disability, marital status, genetic information or sexual orientation”, the California Supreme Court has held, that protections under the Act are not only necessarily limited to the mentioned characteristics. The Unruh Act includes all intentional and arbitrary discrimination by a business establishment based on personal characteristics related to the above mentioned ones.
According to California Penal Code Section 485 (PC-485) it is unlawful to take lost property while knowing the identity of the owner or having ability to pursue information about who the property belongs to.
Prosecutor must establish the following elements to prove that the defendant is guilty of unlawful appropriation of lost property under PC Section 485.
There are two ways of the lost property possession: actual possession and constructive possession. Person has an actual possession when he physically possesses the property. Constructive possession means that a person doesn’t physically posses the property but he holds control and ownership of it.
When a person loses his property it does not mean he relinquishes control or ownership over, unless he intended to abandon it. A person retains his constructive possession of the property while another one gets actual possession of that property. The actual possession can be legal or illegal. The actual possession of property is legal when a person who takes it makes reasonable efforts to find the rightful owner. The possession is considered unlawful in case the person keeps the property without undertaking any actions to return it.
According to California Penal Code 476a it is illegal to make, attempt to make, write, pass, and attempt to pass, posses, use or attempt to use an altered, fake or forged check in order to defraud another person or businesses.
Prosecutor must establish the following element to prove that the defendant is guilty of passing bad checks:
Attempt to use a check means representing it as a genuine or real. The representation or statement can be made by conducts or words and can be made directly or indirectly.
According to California Penal Code Section 288.3 (PC-288.3) it is illegal to contact, communicate with, or attempt to contact or communicate with a person, while knowing that person is a minor, with intention to commit any of the following offenses:
Wire fraud is a crime under both federal and state laws, and the exact definition depends on the law the defendant is charged under.
According to 18 U.S Code Section 1343 wire fraud is defined as recklessly and intentionally making a material misrepresentation to deprive another person of something that has a value. Wire fraud is any kind of fraud scheme that uses wire, radio or television or communication or includes telephone and communications and some types of internet fraud.
Prosecutor must establish the following element for convicting the defendant of a wire fraud:
Usually wire fraud cases involve using misrepresentations for obtaining property or money. But there is also a less known form of a wire fraud called “honest services fraud" which can also lead to charges. Honest services fraud happens when a person abuses a position of trust by accepting kickbacks or committing bribery.
Under California Penal Code Section 118 (PC 118) perjury is an act of knowingly and willfully making false statements after taking an oath, telling the truth, or signing a document that knowingly contains false statements.
The prosecutor must establish the following element to convict the defendant of perjury.
Being under oath is any legal method of confirming the truth of a statement. The most obvious way to be charged with committing perjury is lying under oath during a court proceeding. In case the defendant testified in a civil or criminal or civil case and made a false statement he has committed perjury. A person can also face perjury charges for willfully making false statements while he:
Under California Penal Code 21510 it is criminal offense to carry a switchblade knife on one’s person, possess in the driver’s area of a vehicle in a public place, sell or offer to sell or provide a switchblade to another person.
PC Section 21510 makes it illegal to:
Prosecutor must establish the following elements to prove that a defendant is guilty of carrying or providing a switchblade.
Uber’s rideshare policy isn’t applicable for accidents that take place before a driver accepts a passenger, since Uber considers drivers contractors rather than employees. Consequently, they are not responsible for what happens while the driver isn’t on duty.
Once there is a ride request from a passenger and the driver accepts it, this puts the driver in “on duty” status and Uber’s insurance coverage starts. But in case the driver gets in an accident before he picked up the passenger, it follows that the passenger would have to cancel the ride. This adds a layer of difficulty when claiming the insurance coverage.
The third period is the easiest one to claim insurance coverage from Uber. The passenger is in the Uber car, the driver is “on duty” and the Company must cover whatever happens during this period. Consequently once the driver has been paired with a passenger and after the passenger has entered the Uber car, the company is required to carry a $1 million liability insurance policy. Uber provides its drivers with $1 million of uninsured and underinsured motorist bodily injury coverage. It also provides comprehensive and collision coverage with a $1,000 deductible as long as the driver has collision coverage on his personal auto insurance policy. California law requires the driver to be covered by an auto insurance policy at all times. But since the TNC can help meet that requirement, not all rideshare drivers in California need to purchase rideshare insurance for driving legally. But, the driver may want to purchase an individual rideshare policy which will let to maintain some coverage, such as comprehensive, collision and medical payments, during the First period. Otherwise, the driver would have to pay the costs himself if he is injured or the vehicle is damaged in that period.
It is in your best interest to consult with a Los Angeles Uber accident lawyer about your claim before speaking with Uber or an insurance adjuster. This way you will have more leverage in settlement negotiations with Uber and Uber's insurance adjusters to get the compensation you deserve rather than getting lowball settlement offers. If you or a loved one have been injured in an Uber or Lyft accident we invite you to get in touch with our office. We are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
[video width="1280" height="720" mp4="https://kaass.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Uber-auto-insurance-coverege.mp4"][/video]
Deadly weapon is defined as any object or instrument that is inherently deadly or which can be used in such a way as to cause death or great bodily harm.
Some common defenses to an assault with a deadly weapon charge?
In California assault with a deadly weapon is considered a “wobbler”, and can be charged as either a felony or misdemeanor offense depending on the case facts and defendant’s criminal record. The prosecution will take into account different factors such as the type of weapon, the extent of the victim’s injuries and the manner in which the assault was conducted.
Penalties for misdemeanor assault with deadly weapon conviction are the following:
Penalties for felony assault with deadly weapon conviction are the following:
There are some factors that can increase the penalties beyond this range, such as:
The defendant can be sentenced to up to 9 years in prison if he is convicted of assault using a semiautomatic firearm such as a rifle or handgun.
The defendant can be sentenced to up to 12 years in prison if he is convicted of an assault using an automatic weapon such as a .50 BMG rifle, machine-gun or an assault weapon.
The defendant can be sentenced to up 12 years in prison if the victim was a police officer or firefighter on duty at the time the assault took place.
A felony conviction under PC Section 245 can also result in a “strike” for the purposes of California’s “Three-Strike” law. Three strikes on defendant’s criminal record mean that he can be sentenced to life in prison without parole. Are you in need of a criminal defense attorney in California? Get in touch with KAASS Law if you would like us to take a look into your criminal matter.
The list includes some examples of business establishments that are covered by the Act. The list is non-exhaustive, and can include any place of public accommodation:
If you believe that a business establishment has violated the Unruh Act, you can file a complaint with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH). DFEH is not an advocate for the complaining person or for the business establishment. Department of Fair Employment and Housing represents the State of California. If possible, DFEH will try to assist both parties in resolving the complaint. In case a voluntary settlement cannot be reached, and there is enough evidence of violation, DFEH can issue a civil complaint. Generally the complaint must be filed within one year of the violation. Though, in case the discrimination has connection with hate violence, a person has one year from the day he becomes aware of the committer’s identity to file the complaint, but not more three years from the date of the injury. If a individual wishes to file lawsuit directly through the courts he can do so without involving DFEH.
Possible remedies for violations of the Unruh Act can include:
Court-ordered damages can include up to three times the total amount of the actual damages, also known as “treble damages”, but not less than $4,000 for each offense.
If you believe that you have been discriminated against in housing or by a business, our employment law attorneys at KAASS LAW can evaluate your case understand your rights under the Unruh Act and other California anti-discrimination laws, and take your case to trial or secure a fair settlement. [contact-form-7 id="5673" title="KAASS LAW Contact Form"]
Legal Defenses to PC 485 charges
Knowledge means that defendant actually knew who was the rightful owner of the property, had an ability to find him through an investigation and made a reasonable attempt. A “reasonable attempt” is a question of fact which depends on the specific circumstances of the case and is determined by the jury. Thus for convicting a person in appropriation of lost property under California PC Section 485 prosecution must prove that the defendant had knowledge about the owner or had means of inquiry to find him.
Defendant is not guilty of this offence in case he used the property for a time before returning it to the legal owner. Defendant must have intent to permanently deprive the owner of its value or enjoyment of the property. But in case he returned it or undertook some efforts to find the rightful owner, he is not guilty under PC Section 485. However the defendant can be civilly liable for depriving the owner of its value or enjoyment of the property or damaging it. Penalties for Violating California Penal Code 485 Appropriation of lost property can be filed as an infraction, a misdemeanor or a felony. Charges depend on lost property value. In case the value is more than $950, the offense qualifies as a grand theft, which is a wobbler and can be prosecuted as either a felony of misdemeanor, depending on the defendant’s criminal history and the case circumstances.
Penalties for misdemeanor Penal Code 485 conviction include the following:
Penalties for felony Penal Code 485 conviction include the following:
If the total value of the lost property is $950 or less, the offense is classified as petty theft which is prosecuted as a misdemeanor with the following penalties:
If the defendant has no criminal history and the case circumstances are not that serious he can be charged with an infraction, with no jail time and the fine of up to $250 fine. Are you in need of an experienced lawyer in Los Angeles who can help your court case obtain positive results? Our attorneys at KAASS LAW can provide you with the services you require. We specialize in multiple practice areas of law. Get in touch with an attorney near you to go over the details of your specific situation.
[video width="1280" height="720" mp4="https://kaass.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Appropriation-of-lost-property.mp4"][/video]
The prosecutor must prove the defendant’s intentions to defraud the recipient of the money or other property. Defendant doesn’t necessarily must be successful in his attempt to be considered guilty.
Some legal defenses to Penal Code 476a are as follows:
In case the defendant didn't willfully write, deliver or attempt to use a bad check, he can’t be found guilty for violating PC Section 476a. Thus if the defendant only wrote or delivered the check because he was coerced into doing so by fraud or threats of violence then he hasn’t willfully violated California's bad checks law.
A conviction for this offense cannot be obtained in case the defendant can prove that he had reasonable knew he had an overdraft protection or honestly believed he had enough funds to cover the check.
If you or a loved one have been arrested or charged for Penal Code 476a Writing or Passing Bad Check and seek aggressive defense, we invite you to contact our Glendale criminal defense lawyer for a free consultation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GdwWBNuBqo
Prosecutor must prove the following elements for convicting the defendant of Penal Code 288.3
A minor is a person under the age of 18.
For purposes of California PC Section 288.3, contacting or communication with minor can be direct or indirect. Defendant can personally contact with the minor or through any print medium, through the mail, by postal service or common carrier, through email or the internet and other means of communication. Under California law it is a crime either to contact or communicate or to attempt to contact or communicate with a minor. This means that crime is considered committed merely by sending the communication, regardless of whether the minor receives or responds to that communication.
No intention to commit a crime Defendant should not be convicted under PC Section 288.3 unless the prosecutor can prove that he actually had intention to commit one of the mentioned above sex crimes. Defendant reasonably believed that the person was not a minor In case the defendant can prove that he actually and reasonably believed the person he contacted with was over 18 years this could be a valid legal defense. For example defendant could have met a minor in a place where only persons 21 or older are allowed to be admitted.
A conviction for contacting a minor with intent to commit a felony is punished by the same penalties prescribed for the underlying offense defendant is alleged to have intended. The potential penalties include:
In case the defendant has previous conviction of PC Section 288.3 PC then for any future violations the prison sentence will be increased to an additional and consecutive 5 years. Additionally, for a conviction under PC Section 288.3 PC defendant will be required to register as a sex offender under California Penal Code 290. Are you or a loved one in need of attorney services involving a PC-288.3 charge? Our attorneys at KAASS LAW will be happy to help.
The crime of “wire fraud” can include communications through:
A person can’t be convicted of wire fraud unless he has a scheme or plan to commit a fraud.
Misrepresentation or a lie must be material to support wire fraud charges. This means that the wrong information must be enough important to make influence on another person’s decision. A misrepresentation of an unimportant fact that doesn’t matter cannot count as wire fraud. A defendant can also make a misrepresentation in case he deceives another person by leaving out some important information. Professionals may falsely misrepresent themselves with the intent to financially profit from a situation. There are false misrepresentation lawyers that provide legal defense services for defendants being sued and/or criminally charged, as well as legal assistance for plaintiffs who are suing another party for falsely misrepresenting. Although just to be clear, of course no one lawyer will represent both sides of any same case.
Defendant acted knowingly or recklessly means that he was aware he was telling a lie or he just didn’t care whether his statement was true or false. Thus, for being convicted in wire fraud a person can misrepresent the facts intentionally or can even be recklessly indifferent by making things up without checking if they were true or not.
Potential legal defenses for wire fraud charges are as follows:
For committing a wire fraud defendant must have made a misrepresentation. There can be cases when defendant believed that his statement was true or did not fully understand the situation and simply made a mistake of facts.
The intent to carry out a wire fraud is the most important element of the crime, so the defendant cannot be convicted in case he didn’t want to deceive another person. It is not enough to simply participate in a wire fraud scheme; defendant also needs to have known about the scheme with the specific intention of committing a fraud.
Wire fraud is a federal crime and can result a prison time in federal prison. The penalties for wire fraud include:
[video width="1280" height="720" mp4="https://kaass.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Wire-fraud.mp4"][/video]
If you or a loved one has been arrested and charged with wire fraud 18 U.S. Code section 1343 we invite you to contact offices of KAASS Law at (310) 943-1171 today for a free consultation with our wire fraud defense lawyer.
Material information is the one that can influence or has a probability of affecting the outcome of the proceeding. There is no requirement that the information actually influence the proceedings
Under California Penal Code Section 127 in addition to committing perjury a person can also be convicted for a “suborning perjury”. Suborning perjury means that the defendant intentionally persuaded, invited or coerced another person to commit perjury either in writing or verbally.
Legal defenses for California PC 118 perjury charges include the following:
In case the defendant did not knowingly make a false statement and honestly but mistakenly believed that his statement was true, this can be a valid defense.
In case the defendant corrected a false statement in a timely manner, the attempt can show that he did not have the intent to provide false information.
The defendant can’t be found guilty in case he was not legally under oath when he made a false statement.
Violation of California PC Section 118 is a felony. The judge has the discretion to issue the penalty based on the seriousness of perjury, the defendant’s criminal record, and whether another person was harmed as a result of the perjury. Possible penalties are the following:
In case the defendant is convicted of perjury that leads to the conviction and execution of another person, he will be sentenced for aggravated perjury, which is punishable by a death sentence or a life sentence without the possibility of parole. Perjury conviction will damage the defendant’s credibility and can lead to other potentially long-term and serious and consequences. Are you someone who is in need of legal assistance due to being accused or charged with perjury? If so, you can get in touch with a criminal defense lawyer near you in order to receive the help that you need. In case you are located within the service area of KAASS Law, we may be able to assist you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwF5rSHLE7Q
California Penal Code Section 17235 defines switchblade knife as following:
There are many types of knives that can qualify a switchblade, such as gravity knives, butterfly or batanga knives, spring blades and snap blade knives. A “switchblade knife” does not include a type of knife that can be opened with one hand by putting thumb pressure on a stud which is attached to the knife.
California PC Section 17235 provides an exact description of a switchblade and in case the knife lacks the characteristics of the legal definition, defendant can’t be held criminally liable. Lack of knowledge of presence Defendant must be aware of carrying a switchblade on his person or vehicle. In case he didn’t know that it was in his bag or car then this defense can be applicable. The burden of proof is on the prosecutor, but defendant will have to show some evidence that the bag, coat or car belonged to another person.
Under Penal Code 21510 Carrying a switchable is a misdemeanor and can be punished by:
Defendant is more likely to be sentenced to jail time instead of probation in case the following aggravating factors are present:
Related Offenses
If you or a loved one has been charged with Penal Code 21510 carrying a switchblade we invite you to contact our office for a free consultation with a skilled and experienced Glendale criminal defense lawyer.