Stay updated with the latest legal news, expert analysis, and firm updates from KAASS LAW.
Whether you're facing a legal challenge or seeking proactive counsel, our award-winning team is ready to defend your interests.
Invasion of privacy laws are both criminal and civil in California. They involve false light claims and cases involving the public disclosure of private facts. The laws are similar in that a person does something that invades another's privacy. While the specific activities in criminal and civil proceedings differ in terms of definitions and how they are proven, they are both intrusions on a person's personal affairs.
The California Privacy Act is a wiretapping law. It prohibits the recording of confidential conversations without the consent of all participants. This includes telephone conversations. Victims of illegal wiretapping may be subject to legal damages. Breaking the law is a crime. Violators may face:
During a telephone conversation, both parties must agree to record. Which makes California a "bilaterally agreed" state.
Examples of invasion of privacy are everywhere. We've all heard the story of a man whose ex-boyfriend or girlfriend shared risky photos without their consent. Social media platforms are regularly used as a launching pad for personal attacks. Many of us have probably even become the target of extremely harmful or violent "gossip" about someone's highly personal information. These are all examples of invasion of privacy, and they are all flagrant violations of people's right to maintain the confidentiality of their personal affairs.
Typically, only living people can sue for invasion of privacy, which requires proof that public disclosure of a private fact has taken place. To prove this, it is necessary to establish five elements:
Public disclosure of information includes bringing information to the attention of the general public or a large group of people. A private fact is a detail of your life that is usually not open to others, such as your finances, sexual activity, or your health. When disclosure violates commonly held norms of decency, it is offensive to the typical individual. The disclosure that does not cause legitimate public concern is a disclosure that has no social value but deeply violates a person's privacy. Finally, demonstrating a reckless lie requires demonstrating that the defendant knew how offensive it would be to reveal private facts but did so anyway.
You may be hesitant to disclose a breach of your privacy due to feelings of vulnerability or even humiliation. However, remember that invasion of privacy is a felony that, like any other crime, must be prosecuted. Privacy invasions can range from innocuous to deadly, but no matter how serious they are, reporting them to the appropriate authorities as soon as possible is the best course of action. The consequences of defamation can be as serious as personal injury. As a result you deserve justice for the pain and embarrassment you are experiencing or did in the past.
If you or someone you know is subject to privacy invasion and have further issues, contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. If you have any questions please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
In the event of an accident involving a police vehicle, injured parties or their families may be eligible to file a personal injury claim or wrongful death case. Whether or not a police officer is responsible may depend on:
Accidents involving a police vehicle are distinct from other types of collisions. The driver may believe that the police are immune from liability if they struck a pedestrian or driver with their vehicle. However, in cases where a patrol car is a part of an accident and injures a motorist, passenger, or pedestrian, the police and the city may still be responsible. Everyone involved in an automobile collision needs to make sure they are okay and safe. The sufferers should seek quick medical assistance if they sustain any injuries. The driver and passengers should think about consulting a doctor even if they are unsure if they sustained any major injuries. A day or two after the collision, many car accident victims discover they sustained injuries. Avoid accepting responsibility for an accident. When the other driver is a police officer, it may be more challenging to accomplish this, especially if the officer is attempting to intimidate you. The decision on who was at fault for the accident is not up to the officer. After considering all the facts, the court should decide who was at blame, not on the basis of a single officer's point of view.
Employees occasionally have the right to sue their employers under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act for workplace harassment committed by a non-supervisor. Employees have a right under the FEHA to be free from all forms of harassment including:
Most individuals first consider supervisory harassment when they hear of workplace harassment. The FEHA prohibits the following types of supervisory harassment:
Every boater should be aware of the dangers of operating a vessel while under the influence of alcohol or drugs (BUI). Every state makes it illegal to operate a boat while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. A federal law against BUI is also enforced by the Coast Guard. This legislation applies to all boats (from canoes and rowboats to the largest ships), as well as foreign vessels operating in US waterways and US vessels operating on the high seas.
Boating under the influence are actions, which are criminalized under section 655 of the Harbors Navigation Code of California. Particularly, the above-mentioned section states that it is a crime to commit the following actions:
California BUI law criminalizes the following actions:
California law defines the term assault as follows: an attempt to cause violent injury to someone. We can deduce from the definition that the victim does not need to get severe injuries for criminal liability to exist, thus. Significant harm is not a requirement for the crime to exist. California law distinguishes between different types of assaults, which have their specific elements of the crime. For instance, there are separate sections for assault with a firearm, assault with caustic chemicals, etc. Further, we will examine one assault by means likely to produce great bodily injury.
Under Penal Code Section 245 (a) (4), assault is defined as using force likely to produce great bodily injury to the victim. This section covers situations where an individual intentionally attempts to cause significant harm to someone else using force, and the potential for injury is severe.
As stated, this type of assault does not require actual injury to occur. Even if the victim is not injured or the injury occurs accidentally, charges can still be brought against the defendant. In other words, an assault charge under this section can be made if there is an attempt to cause harm through violent force, even if no physical injury is inflicted.
A minors' compromise and release hearing is required by California law if a child under the age of eighteen is injured and receives a monetary settlement from the at-fault party. This means that a guardian must be appointed by the court unless the child is legally emancipated, a judge must approve the settlement for your injured child, and the settlement funds must generally be deposited into a blocked account in any FDIC-insured bank, trust company, savings and loan associate, or similar financial institution located in the state of California, until the child is eighteen years of age. The settlement funds can also be invested in a vehicle like an insurance annuity contract (single-premium deferred annuity). Alternatively, you can have a portion of the funds deposited in a bank and a portion of the funds deposited in an investment vehicle. Please see other articles on this website for more information, or your child's injury lawyer can explain which method is best for depositing settlement funds.
According to California Probate Code Sections 2504,90 3500,91 3600,92 and California Code of Civil Procedure Section 372.93, an enforceable settlement of a can only be consummated with California court approval. The whole point of a court-supervised settlement for injured minors in California is to: Appoint a guardian to assist the minor child in monitoring his or her settlement funds.
A rollover accident is when a vehicle's momentum causes it to turn over. Rollovers can result in catastrophic injuries that can be life-threatening. Rollovers are more likely to happen during the winter months because of low tire pressure, black ice, and wet roads. Nobody expects their automobile to flip, and there are few things to be aware of if it does.
While any vehicle can roll over, vehicles with a high center of gravity, such as SUVs, pickup trucks, and vans, are far more likely to do so. The majority of rollovers are "tripped" rollovers, which occur when the vehicle is destabilized by an external force. A vehicle can be tripped in a variety of ways, including:
In California, victims of police misconduct, brutality, or excessive force can file a lawsuit. Typically, the lawsuit is based on civil rights violations. The victim may be awarded monetary damages in the lawsuit. It can also seek an injunction to prevent future wrongdoing. Also, it's possible that the officer will face criminal charges as a result of this.
The term "police misconduct" refers to police officers who engage in illegal or inappropriate behavior. Discrimination, obstruction of justice, and other forms of police misconduct are examples of misconduct. Police misconduct is the illegal behavior of police officers, which takes various forms such as:
In California, school attendance is a legal requirement. Parents or guardians must ensure their children attend school regularly, and failing to do so can result in serious legal consequences. If you're unsure about what qualifies as truancy and whether you could face prosecution for your child's absences, this guide will help clarify California's truancy laws, penalties, and defenses for parents.
California's Education Code outlines the rules surrounding truancy. A truant student is a child who has missed:
A chronic truant is a student who misses more than 10% of the school year without a valid excuse. For example, if a child misses more than 18 days during a 180-day school year, they are considered chronically truant.
For more information, check out the California Department of Education’s Truancy Guidelines.
Multidistrict litigation (MDL) is the process of simplifying complicated civil actions that emerge out of the same line of activity by consolidating them into a single federal district court for preliminary hearings, such as mass tort cases and products liability claims.
Only civil lawsuits filed in federal court have the option of multidistrict litigation (MDL). One comparison is drawn between criminal and civil proceedings. Person who has suffered harm in a civil case. A claim is made against the person or thing who has done it; this person is also known as the plaintiff. The goal of civil lawsuits is to recover damages for the plaintiff's losses. These cases may occur in federal court rather than state court if either of the following applies:
Which motorist was at fault in a car accident typically determines who was at fault. A driver may be held accountable for an accident if they run a red light and collide with another vehicle. What transpires, though, if a police officer runs a red light and strikes another motorist? Injury claims for those struck by police cars depend on the circumstances surrounding the incident and the driver's actions. The injured party may be entitled to seek compensation from the city or county for their damages if the police officer is found to have been negligent. If a driver breaks a traffic rule and causes an accident as a result, the driver may be labile . Emergency vehicles are, however, occasionally exempt from regular traffic restrictions under California's "emergency vehicle exemption" law.
The officer must be reacting to an emergency in order to be excluded from some traffic restrictions. An officer who is:
A police officer does not have the right to argue that since they are officers. They are exempt from following the law. When an officer is returning from a call or using his or her own vehicle when there is no emergency, it is not regarded as an emergency.
Even if a police officer was responding to an emergency while driving with lights and sirens on, the officer may still have been culpable in causing the collision. According to California's negligence statutes, the negligent party is responsible for any harm and losses brought on to any motorists, passengers, or pedestrians involved in the collision. Driving negligently is not adhering to the obligation of care. Drivers, including police personnel, must adhere to the following standards of care:
Compared to typical automobile accident claims, police car accidents are significantly more complicated. Hiring the best personal injury attorney will allow the injured victims and their families to feel secure knowing they are in skilled hands rather than attempting to manage a catastrophic accident claim alone. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
The fact that the employer is strictly accountable for any harassment, regardless of the manner, is the most crucial concept to comprehend. If the victim's supervisor or a person with ever higher authority (for instance, the supervisor's supervisor) was responsible. This indicates that it did not matter if it took appropriate action to stop the harassment from occurring. If an employee sues, claiming that their supervisor harassed them, the employer may still be liable for damages.
If an employee is experiencing harassment by non a supervisor, they may still take their employers to court under the Fair Employment and Housing Act. (This refers to hostile workplace harassment rather than sexual harassment for financial gain.) The employer is only liable in a workplace harassment lawsuit if the company was negligent. The following two conditions therefore need to be met:
This kind of litigation will center on whether the employer took action to stop harassment in the workplace. Another issue is how the company handled reports of harassment or other warning indicators. To the extent that the harassing behavior may have been clear to anybody in authority, the employer shall know about it. If this is the case, harassment is still illegal even if the victim does not disclose it. The employer must act quickly to halt it or they run the danger of being found negligent.
When an employee is experiencing harassment by a customer or client of the firm, particularly a significant one, whether it be sexual or otherwise, a difficult scenario occurs. The employer's natural impulse is to appease and appease the client or customer in order to keep their business. But it would be foolish to act on this instinct in light of California harassment law and the FEHA. Similar to how it would be for sexual harassment committed by a coworker, an employer is liable for third-party harassment if its conduct contributed to the harassment. Negligence is when an employer fails to take the necessary corrective action while knowing or having a duty to know about the harassment. All employers who are aware that their employees are experiencing harassment by clients, customers, or independent contractors must address the hostile work environment this produces. This is true even in circumstances when sexual harassment would appear to be almost certain (such as when a woman works in a jail for men).
Do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions about workplace harassment by supervisors and non-supervisors. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
If a BUI suspect fails a chemical breath test or a blood test within three hours of driving the boat, California law presumes that they have an illegal BAC level. Defendants, on the other hand, can challenge this presumption in court. Evidence that the breathalyzer was faulty or that the blood samples were tainted, for example, might invalidate the chemical test results.
A person is considered to be under the influence, if, as a result of drinking and/or consuming alcohol, taking drugs, his/her mental or physical abilities are so impaired that he/she is no longer able to drive a vehicle (vessel) with a caution of a sober person, using ordinary care, under similar circumstances. In other words, the influence of alcohol and drugs on your organism shall be so essential that it shall cause you:
For instance, suppose you drank some beer while operating a boat, but you are a professional driver and the drink has no effect on the boat's performance. They won't find you guilty of violating California's Harbor and Navigation Code § 655 (b). However, the case will be different if you are a new driver of a vessel, and the percentage of alcohol in your blood can easily lead to operating the boat worse than usual. The prosecution considers a number of variables when determining whether you are under the influence of alcohol or drugs. These factors are:
Under this subsection, it is illegal to:
This subsection differs from the one previously discussed. In case your abilities to drive your boat were not under effect of the alcohol concentration in your blood. However, the test is revealing that it was 0.08 percent or higher, it can be illegal.
The actions, considered to be offenses under this section, are:
The level of caused bodily injury does not play a role in accusing the person of a violation of this subsection. To understand when you can be convicted for violation of this subsection, let's consider the following example. If you operate your boat faster than the speed limit in the region while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. You may be found guilty of violating the relevant provision if your friend falls and fractures her hand as a result of your actions. You can try to prove that you were not under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or their combination while committing the unlawful act or neglecting the duty. The above mentioned can help to mitigate the penalties.
The violations are variable thus it is essential to find a professional attorney to assist you in defense against the penalties. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
To better understand Penal Code 245 (a) (4), we need to break down its essential components. The primary elements that define this assault charge include:
This section focuses on the potential for severe injury rather than the injury itself, making it different from other assault charges that may not involve the same degree of harm.
A crucial element that distinguishes this form of assault from others is the concept of "great bodily injury" (GBI). Great bodily injury refers to substantial or significant harm that severely impacts the victim's physical well-being. This can include:
The court will evaluate whether the injury qualifies as "great" based on various factors, including the severity of pain, the necessity for immediate medical care, and the long-term impact on the victim’s life. Minor or moderate injuries that do not result in major physical harm will not meet the threshold for great bodily injury.
It’s important to note that financial losses or emotional trauma do not qualify as great bodily injury under the law, as the term specifically refers to physical harm.
Assault by means likely to produce great bodily injury can include both as felony and misdemeanor under California Law. Depending on the facts of the case, the classification and sanctions may differ. The accused's criminal background, as well as the consequences of his or her actions. In the event that the actions are classified as a misdemeanor. The maximum penalty may be up to one year in county jail or a fine of not more than $10,000. If the crime is a felony, the penalties may include imprisonment in state prison for two, three, or four years.
An essential element for this type of assault is that the actions are likely to cause great bodily injury. Thus, the accused can prove that the possibility of great bodily injuries occurring was little. For example, if one threw an item at a victim who had little weight, the person couldn't sustain injuries from this action. Another way to defend against the penalties is by proving that the actions were conducted in self-defense. In this case, the act was willful, but there was no intent to cause great bodily injury to anyone.
These are possibilities in theory that can help with your defense, however, it is essential to have a professional lawyer to assist you and try to mitigate the penalties. If you have any questions, contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
In California, the court process is the best way to approve and monitor a bodily injury settlement for a minor. After the court approved their child’s injury settlement and deposited the funds into a bank account, parents approached me to petition the judge for an early release of part of the funds that didn’t directly benefit the minor. Some parents forget that California’s court process exists to protect the child’s interests because the settlement funds belong to the child. Courts will allow an early release of funds, but they closely scrutinize such requests and require that the money benefit the minor directly.
Courts supervise minor settlements in California to ensure that children receive full protection under the law. Judges appoint guardians, evaluate the fairness of settlement terms, and oversee fund distribution. This process ensures that parents, insurance companies, or other parties do not misuse the minor’s funds. The courts take an active role in protecting a child’s financial interests until they turn eighteen. Without this safeguard, many minors could lose access to money that was rightfully theirs. The legal system prioritizes the child’s well-being above all else and aims to prevent financial exploitation or irresponsible use of settlement proceeds.
At a minor’s compromise hearing, the court reviews all settlement documents and hears from the guardian and attorneys involved. The judge examines the proposed settlement amount, attorney fees, and any medical liens or expenses. If the judge finds the settlement fair and in the best interest of the child, they approve it. Once approved, the funds move into a blocked account or annuity. Parents and guardians must present clear justification for any early withdrawal requests. Judges often ask questions to ensure that the settlement truly benefits the minor. They also check that the agreement complies with California Probate Code and Civil Procedure requirements.
Parents must gather key documents and understand the legal steps before attending a minor’s settlement hearing. They should consult with a personal injury attorney to file the proper paperwork, including a petition for approval and financial documentation. Courts expect parents or guardians to fully explain how they will use and safeguard the funds. Parents should also discuss blocked account options or annuity investments with financial advisors. Courts want to see responsible planning to protect the minor’s future. Preparing thoroughly not only helps ensure a smooth court process but also builds trust with the judge, increasing the likelihood of approval.
For more information on California’s court procedures for minor settlements, visit the California Courts Self-Help Center on Minor's Compromise.
If the monetary settlement is less than $5,000, California Probate Code Sections 3611(d), 94, and 340195 have routinely allowed custodial parents to manage the settlement funds directly on behalf of their minor children, avoiding the need for court approval. In fact, all of California's major insurance carriers routinely waive minors' compromise and release hearings when the settlement amount to the injured child is less than $5,000.
Judges do not require court approval for settlements under $5,000. Judges can choose to place the minor child's funds in a blocked account with court-approved withdrawals. They may also order direct payment to the custodial parent(s).
Are you looking for an attorney to help you with your case? Look no further, Kaass Law will be able to provide you great experience, knowledge and satisfaction. Fell free to call our office at 310.943.1171.
Rollover accidents are among the most dangerous types of automobile accidents. Although rollovers account for a small percentage of all passenger vehicle accidents, the consequences can be fatal. Common causes of these types of accidents include:
It's important for drivers to know how they should react if their vehicle begins to roll over so they can make sure they get out safely. Rollover accidents frequently result in partial or complete ejection of the vehicle's occupants, increasing the risk of catastrophic and fatal injuries. So, what causes rollovers? A number of these accidents happen when a driver loses control of their vehicle and it begins to slide sideways. When this happens, an object such as a curb, guardrail, or uneven ground could cause the vehicle to roll over. Rollover accidents can also occur when a driver attempts to turn the vehicle quickly. The friction between the road and the tires in such cases may cause the vehicle to tip and roll over. Rollovers involving multiple vehicles are also common. This is where one vehicle may collide with another.
A car manufacturer is frequently held liable for a rollover accident. Some vehicles are built in such a way that they are highly susceptible to rollovers. Individual vehicle components may also contribute to a rollover; for example, poor tires might make it much simpler for an impediment to create a "tripped" rollover. Furthermore, even if the rollover was not caused by the manufacturer's negligence, the injuries incurred in a rollover may be the result of the manufacturer's negligence. In the case of a rollover, a vehicle's roof should be constructed and reinforced to protect the occupants; if a manufacturer skimps on safety, the people involved could suffer far more serious injuries. Of course, the driver of the rollover vehicle's irresponsibility may also be taken into consideration. Whether it's driving at a hazardous speeds or driving while intoxicated, rollovers may result. Liability may also be from companies or governments who are in charge of upkeep in the roads. Another liable party may be the driver. Driving at high speeds or intoxicated may also be the cause of such accident. The driver's seatbelt should always be worn for safety reasons; wearing one may prevent an injury from happening if there is a rollover or collision with another car or object.
We are familiar with the complicated legal concerns that arise in rollover accidents. Your life may have been altered by the accident, and you may face new challenges in the future, but you do not have to face them alone. Hire a law firm that understands how to deal with your case. Please contact us at 310.943.1171.
These actions result in violations of the civil rights of the plaintiff, guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, such as the right of the freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures, right to privacy, etc.
The respondents are police officers, sheriffs, other officers, representing law enforcement agencies. A bright example of police brutality is the use of excessive force by the police. This misconduct usually happens when the police try to arrest someone. As to the law, the police can use force during an arrest, however, only such force is reasonably necessary for the arrest. Taking into account the fact that the victim can run away from the police, can resist, etc. On a case-by-case basis, courts consider whether the use of force was reasonable and proportionate to the arrest, or whether the use of force surpasses the necessary and desirable threshold.
Though we live in a developed society of the 21st century, racial profiling can still be an issue. Everyone enjoys equal protection under the law and racial profiling cannot serve as a ground to suspect people of committing a crime. A person can file a lawsuit against the police officer if he proves that the unlawful detention, searches or seizures, or other actions conducted by the police officer were based on racial profiling.
An arrest is when someone's freedom of movement is intentionally restricted. The person is forced to stay or go somewhere against his will as a result of the deprivation. A false arrest occurs when a peace officer has no legal authority to make an arrest. False arrests are a violation of the victim's right to due process under the Fourth Amendment. False imprisonments are another name for them. They may occur when:
Without a warrant, some victims are detained. In these situations, the officer must demonstrate that he or she had probable cause. This necessitates demonstrating that there was reasonable cause to believe the person arrested had committed one of the following crimes:
Other arrests are made on the basis of a warrant. Even if the warrant was invalid, these could still be false arrests.
If the police officer found evidence during the misconduct (for example, during unlawful seizures and searches), the plaintiff can ask the court to exclude such evidence from the case. Other types of claims are possible to file against the police officer. The plaintiff can file a section 1983 claim or Biven’s lawsuit against the police.
Section 1983 claims can be filed for violations done under color of law, which means, conducted acts are legitimized by and are related to the role of the officer. Such lawsuits can be filed to receive such remedies as compensation for caused monetary damages or injunction by the court. Biven's claim is quite similar to the section 1983 lawsuit. However, it can be filed against such federal actors as DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency) FBI officers.
Contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
If parents or guardians fail to supervise their child’s school attendance, they could face severe legal penalties.
Under Penal Code 270.1, parents can face charges if they fail to ensure their child attends school. The law applies to children aged 6 or older, enrolled in kindergarten through eighth grade. The penalties for this violation include:
Additionally, if a child’s absenteeism leads to more serious legal issues, parents may face charges under Penal Code 272, which deals with contributing to a minor’s delinquency.
A child who skips school may also face criminal charges for related offenses, such as:
These charges show how truancy can lead to more serious legal problems.
To prosecute a parent for truancy, certain criteria must be met. The child must be a chronic truant, and the parent must have failed to supervise their child’s school attendance adequately. However, California law offers a few defenses for parents.
Parents can defend themselves by demonstrating reasonable efforts to supervise their child’s school attendance. For example, they may show they communicated with the school, arranged transportation, or addressed issues that caused the absenteeism.
If the child’s absences do not qualify as chronic truancy, this can serve as a defense. Parents can dispute the school’s attendance records or provide evidence that the child’s absences were excused.
If a confession was obtained through improper police conduct, parents may argue that the confession was coerced. If proven, the court could exclude the confession from evidence or drop the case entirely.
Schools often try to intervene before pursuing legal action. Parents and students typically receive:
In persistent truancy cases, schools may recommend alternative educational programs or offer counseling services to prevent further legal action.
California’s truancy laws require children to attend school, and parents must ensure their children comply. Failing to do so can lead to legal penalties, but parents can use several defenses. Schools try to help families before resorting to legal action by providing support and resources.
If you are concerned about truancy or facing prosecution, contact KAASS LAW for expert legal guidance. We are here to help you navigate these complex issues.
📞 Call 310.943.1171 to schedule a consultation.
A number of problems would arise if each victim were to pursue their own claim due to the actions of one defendant. The injuries resulting by hundreds of people from various locations could be due to the following:
Congress established a statute allowing judges to combine these claims in multidistrict litigation in order to avoid these issues.
Personal injury cases that share numerous facts yet included victims from different locations across the nation are consolidated into one federal district court through the MDL process for all pretrial proceedings. These preliminary hearings consist of:
The matter is back to the district court if it does not resolve during these pretrial proceedings.
MDLs and class actions have some similarities, but they also differ significantly. What matters most is:
Multidistrict litigation will alter the course of your case in several significant ways if you choose to pursue a personal injury claim through it. However, not all of them will have an effect on the resolution of your case or your capacity to obtain the just recompense. The estrangement experienced as a result of MDL is the primary distinction. The fact that your case will be heard thousands or perhaps hundreds of kilometers away may make you feel disconnected from the proceedings. However, by, for instance, preparing for and participating in a deposition, this can also lessen the amount of time you will need to spend on it personally. However, there are key distinctions between a typical personal injury case and an MDL that might affect the result. While some of these favor plaintiffs, others benefit defendants. Multidistrict litigation has another significant distinction in that settlements are frequently much more common than in typical personal injury claims. This is particularly valid if your claim is a tag-along claim rather than one of the MDL's initial filings. In an MDL, these first claims frequently result in bellwether trials.
The majority of personal injury lawsuits are significantly less complicated than multidistrict litigation. The personal injury attorneys in Glendale can assist you. Calling our office is always welcome at 310.943.1171.