Stay updated with the latest legal news, expert analysis, and firm updates from KAASS LAW.
Whether you're facing a legal challenge or seeking proactive counsel, our award-winning team is ready to defend your interests.
In a major decision, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld federal "ghost gun" regulations. They allow authorities to collect unregistered guns from homes. This is a rare victory for gun control advocates in a conservative-leaning court and changes the approach to gun regulation.
"Ghost guns" are kits that people can order online and assemble into complete guns at home. The main feature of these kits is the lack of serial numbers, which makes the guns invisible to law enforcement. This makes it possible for people who, for whatever reason, cannot legally purchase a gun to assemble one themselves. Under new federal regulations put in place by the Biden administration in 2022, manufacturers will have to put serial numbers on the kits and conduct background checks on buyers. The measures were put in place in response to the growing number of "ghost guns" found at crime scenes. While police officers sent in 1,600 such guns for testing in 2017, that number will grow to more than 19,000 by 2021.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that these regulations were legal. A majority of 7 to 2 upheld the decision. The justices recognized that these kits are not just parts, but full-fledged weapons that must be regulated. Justice Neil Gorsuch pointed out that a kit only takes half an hour to use and is designed to build a weapon. Gorsuch also noted the technological changes that have occurred since the Gun Control Act was passed. Back in the day, making guns at home was not possible due to the high cost of equipment. With the advancement of technology such as 3D printing and the use of reinforced polymers, it has become much easier to make guns at home. This change dramatically changes the approach to legal regulation.
Despite the justices' support, the decision was criticized by some right-wing groups. Conservative Justice Clarence Thomas argued in his dissent that the federal government overstepped its authority. He argued that the 1968 law did not cover the "unfinished gun parts" that go into the kits. In his view, Congress did not grant authority to regulate such gun parts. The group Federal Coalition Gun Foundation, one of the organizations that challenged the decision, expressed disappointment. They said the decision was just one step in a long war over gun rights and limiting government power.
This case has raised questions about how the US will regulate guns in the future. Especially as the Supreme Court has moved more to the right on gun issues in recent years. Last year, for example, the court struck down a ban on devices that turn semi-automatic rifles into weapons capable of firing hundreds of bullets per minute. The court did not consider the case through the lens of the Second Amendment, but the decision could influence future changes in the law. President Biden has already said that his administration will continue to support Americans' gun rights within reasonable controls.
The main argument of opponents of the kits is that they create a loophole in the law, allowing you to bypass standard gun purchase procedures. Such as:
One of the key aspects of the new regulations is the requirement to put serial numbers on parts and conduct background checks on buyers. This could significantly change the market for "ghost guns" as companies will now have to comply with stricter regulations. This will increase the cost of these kits and potentially limit their availability. The companies that make these kits have already stated that they will fight the new regulations.
They argue that the kits are just parts, not weapons, and that they do not have to consider safety measures. However, with the Supreme Court upholding the decision, there is reason to believe that the new regulations will remain in place. The Supreme Court's decision in the Ghost Guns case is an important moment in the gun rights debate in the United States. Despite the controversy, the decision shows that technology is changing both the production of guns and the approach to gun regulation. The future of gun regulation in the US will now depend on how government agencies adapt to new challenges. Such as 3D printing and the online sale of gun assembly components.
KAASS LAW will be monitoring legislative developments and will be available to provide legal assistance.
The latest philosophical debate over the political independence of our country’s judicial system has taken another controversial turn as President Trump and Chief Justice Roberts exchange some heated words, ultimately leading to a critical disagreement. This negative response marks the first instance in which Chief Justice Roberts has had any amount of criticism towards President Trump, which is quite significant because it is a known fact that Roberts is a Republican. Specifically, Roberts made a push against Trump’s description of a judge who had ruled against Trump’s migrant asylum policy as an “Obama judge”. The claim did not land well with Roberts because, according to him, the United States does not have “Obama judges or Trump judges”. Presumably, he took most issue with the implicit assumption that underlies Trump’s declaration–just because a judge does not rule in his policy’s favor, does not mean that judge is politically partial to any representative or candidate. Roberts further goes on to say just before Thanksgiving that, “an independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.” In Roberts’s interpretation, having a politically unbiased, neutral judicial branch is imperative to maintaining our judicial system and keeping it free of outside influences or political drama. Trump’s statement against the judge clearly shows that Trump feels otherwise, claiming instead that certain judges are just outright against him or his party specifically, thus creating an unfair judicial climate. Given that Roberts is a Chief Justice, it is quite clear to see how Trump’s declarations would have moved him to break his long-standing silence and to make a few bold statements of his own. Perhaps what’s most uncomfortable about this whole situation is that these latest remarks come as the Supreme Court is entangled in controversy over Trump’s appointment of Justice Brett Kavanaugh. At this point, several justices have spoken out about the importance of judicial independence and about the dangers of having the court be viewed as a political institution divided between five conservative and four liberal judges. However, when asked to comment, the White House had no immediate responses regarding Trump’s remarks or Roberts’s criticisms. Overall, the political climate in the United States has never been more divided in modern U.S. politics and the need to keep our judicial system free of its wiles and influences is greater than ever before. Roberts has a very good point in that preserving the political independence of our judiciary system is paramount for a more just democracy. On the other hand, Trump also has a point regarding the current iteration of our Supreme Court Justices: if it is so easy to view the Supreme Court as a constant balance of power between the conservative and liberal justices, then shouldn’t we need to do more to accomplish our goal of judicial impartiality? Either way you look at it, what we choose to do regarding these issues as a nation will set the standard for how we view the judicial system alongside politics and bias in our country for years to come.
Yes, it is legal for a property owner to charge a tenant a late fee if their rent has not been paid on time. However, California law subjects landlords to some regulations when doing charging a tenant a late fee. The most important regulation is that the lease agreement must lay out the terms for late-payments and specifically describe when and how a late fee must be paid. This section of the contract must include the amount to be paid when a late fee can be charged, and clauses stating that the payment represents an adequate compensation of the damages caused by the lateness of the rent payment.
California law requires that the late fee be a “reasonable” amount of money meant for fixing the damage caused by the delay of a tenant’s payment. Courts have had varying definitions on what constitutes a reasonable amount, but the general consensus is that a late fee of 5% of monthly rent is considered reasonable for late payment, and the fee can be up to 10% for “extremely” late payments. Extremely late payment would be paid after the tenant was given a contractually obligated, “grace period.”
A grace period refers to the amount of time a tenant has to pay their rent before accruing a late fee or increasing an existing late fee. California law does not require landlords to give tenants a grace period, meaning that if they choose, landlords can charge a late fee a day after rent is due. However, many landlords choose to include grace periods so they can collect a higher late fee, due to the courts’ recognition of an “extremely” late payment as previously mentioned.
Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). In arbitration, parties submit a dispute to a neutral third party, an arbitrator. The arbitrator makes a decision, which is often binding. Unlike litigation, arbitration is characterized by:
The process can be conducted online, in private, and without the need to follow the rules of evidence in a court of law. At KAASS LAW, arbitration is one of our core practices.
Arbitration applies when:
However, arbitration is most commonly used in:
For example, when an employee signs an employment contract that states arbitration will resolve any disputes, the employee gives up the right to go to court. As the National Employment Law Project points out, more than 60 million employees in the U.S. are bound by binding arbitration agreements. This means that a significant portion of employment disputes do not make it to court, but are handled through closed arbitration proceedings. At KAASS LAW, we carefully analyze the arbitration provisions in our clients' contracts and provide legal support. Read more about us on our page.
Here are 3 common grounds for Cancellation of Removal (deportation) in the U.S., keeping in mind that eligibility requirements are strict and vary depending on the specific ground:
This is often referred to as "Cancellation of Removal for Green Card Holders." To be eligible, a Lawful Permanent Resident (Green Card holder) must meet all of the following strict criteria: ● Lawful Permanent Resident Status for at Least 5 Years: The individual must have been admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident and held that status for a minimum of five years. ● Continuous Residence in the U.S. for At Least 7 Years After Lawful Admission: This seven-year period of continuous residence must have occurred after their lawful admission as a permanent resident. Brief absences from the U.S. may break this continuity. ● No Aggravated Felony Conviction: The LPR must not have been convicted of any aggravated felony. This is a very broad category of serious crimes under U.S. immigration law. ● Discretionary Relief: Even if all the above requirements are met, Cancellation of Removal is a discretionary form of relief. An Immigration Judge (IJ) will weigh the positive factors in the LPR's case against the negative factors to determine whether to grant relief. Positive factors can include family ties in the U.S., a history of lawful employment, community involvement, rehabilitation, and evidence of hardship to the LPR or their U.S. citizen or LPR family members if they were deported. Negative factors can include the seriousness of the deportable offense, criminal history, and violations of immigration laws.
This is a more commonly sought form of Cancellation of Removal for individuals who are not Green Card holders. The eligibility requirements are even more stringent: ● Continuous Physical Presence in the U.S. for At Least 10 Years: The individual must have been physically present in the United States for a continuous period of at least ten years immediately preceding the date of their application for Cancellation of Removal. Very brief and innocent absences may not break continuity, but any significant departure can. ● Good Moral Character (GMC) During Those 10 Years: The applicant must have maintained good moral character throughout the entire ten-year period. Certain criminal convictions and actions can bar a finding of GMC. ● Not Convicted of Certain Crimes: The individual cannot have been convicted of: ○ Any offense listed in INA § 212(a)(2) (relating to criminal grounds of inadmissibility), with some limited exceptions for minor offenses. This includes crimes involving moral turpitude, controlled substance violations, and multiple criminal convictions. ○ Any offense listed in INA § 237(a)(2) (relating to criminal grounds of deportability), with some limited exceptions. This includes aggravated felonies and certain other criminal offenses. ○ Any offense under INA § 237(a)(3) (relating to failure to register and falsification of documents). ● Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship to a Qualifying Relative: The deportation of the non-LPR must result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to their U.S. citizen or Lawful Permanent Resident (Green Card holder) spouse, parent, or child. This is a very high legal standard of hardship, significantly greater than the "extreme hardship" standard used in some other immigration contexts. Economic hardship alone is usually insufficient. The hardship must be unique and particularly severe. ● Discretionary Relief: Similar to Cancellation for LPRs, this relief is also discretionary, and the IJ will balance positive and negative factors.
To prove workplace discrimination, one can use direct evidence, circumstantial evidence, or demonstrate a pattern of unfair treatment.
Discriminatory intent is shown clearly by direct evidence. Strong proof of workplace bias is provided by it. The employer's intent is often directly revealed. Explicit statements or actions are included as examples. A supervisor might be instructed by an email to demote someone. The demotion could be based on their religion. A clear preference might be stated by a written company policy. Employees of a specific race could be favored. Clear indications of direct proof of discrimination are these examples.
This evidence isn't a clear sign of bias. Instead, it gathers clues. These clues suggest the employer had unfair reasons. It looks at how people were treated differently. People not in the protected group got better treatment. We can compare how workers were rated. We can write down mean things bosses said or did. We can show if job choices seemed unfair. These clues can help show discrimination.
This type of proof shows a repeated pattern of unfairness. It looks at how the employer treated others. These others share your protected characteristics. We gather evidence of many separate times. Emails and written letters can be key. Other company documents might reveal a pattern. This pattern suggests the employer has a history of bias. It indicates the unfair treatment wasn't just a single error. This can strengthen your discrimination claim.
Have you ever had a criminal charge brought against you? Have you experienced any kind of personal injury following the accusation? If you replied yes to both of these questions, please read the article below. Everyone makes errors. Good people can occasionally get into legal difficulties. Perhaps you were arrested for petty drug possession or were found guilty of drunk driving when you were younger. A criminal background may have an influence on a personal injury claim. Since your criminal history is unrelated to a personal injury claim, it should be judged on its own merits. However, the opposing party may still try to use it to undermine your credibility during a civil claim.
A criminal record may likely have a negative impact on many aspects of your life, but the relationship between a past crime and personal injury claim is one that you might not expect. Even if there is no connection between your criminal background and your personal injury claim, if you have a criminal history, you can face discrimination or have your reputation damaged. A criminal record may affect many aspects of your life including employment, housing, and relationships. It can be challenging to shake the stigma attached to having the moniker "criminal," even if you are not guilty of the offense for which you were found guilty. Potentially worse, you can even be refused access to certain benefits or services due to prior criminal accusations. However, not all crimes will make an individual ineligible for their civil rights caused by another person or company. There are different variables to take into consideration. Let's take the scenario where the victim was long ago charged with a crime. Yes, it may have happened even now, but since it happened so long ago, the victims' case will probably be treated less seriously. Furthermore, it depends on the crime that was committed.
Even a seemingly minor accident can have unexpected consequences down the road. A "minor accident" usually means a low-impact incident with minimal vehicle damage (scratches, small dents) and only minor physical injuries (bruises, soreness). Think fender benders or parking lot bumps. Here are three compelling reasons why reaching out to a lawyer afterward is a smart move:
Getting checked out by a doctor right after an accident is important, even if you feel okay at the moment. Here are three key reasons why:
Hidden or Delayed Injuries: Accidents can cause injuries that aren't immediately obvious, such as whiplash, internal bleeding, or concussions. Adrenaline can temporarily mask pain, making it difficult to realize the extent of the damage. Preventing Complications: Prompt medical attention allows for early diagnosis and treatment, which can help prevent minor injuries from developing into more serious conditions. Addressing Immediate Issues: Even if injuries seem minor, seeking care can ensure that any underlying conditions are identified and treated, preventing further complications.
Documentation for Claims: A medical record provides a clear connection between the accident and any sustained injuries, which is crucial for insurance claims and legal proceedings. Establishing a Timeline: It helps to document the timing of injury onset and treatment, which can be important in determining the scope of your injuries and the cause of your symptoms.
Protecting Your Rights: Seeking medical care immediately demonstrates good faith and can strengthen your position in any legal proceedings related to the accident. Facilitating Compensation: It can make it easier to obtain fair compensation for your injuries and medical expenses. Early diagnosis and treatment can lead to a quicker and more complete recovery.
Video about if an injured person can sue a rental motorcycle company for an accident. [video width="1280" height="720" mp4="https://kaass.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/can-an-injured-person-sue-a-rental-motorcycle-video-by-kaass-law.mp4"][/video]
Tenants who feel that they have been wrongfully charged with a late fee or charged with an unreasonable amount should seek legal representation. Often, landlords use late payments as an excuse to evict tenants or raise their rent in the future. If the late fees you were charged are unlawful, you will be entitled to reimbursement for the fees as well as any other damages that paying the late fee has caused to you.
The arbitration process can vary depending on the specific arbitration agreement and the organization that administers the process. However, common steps include:
Arbitrators' decisions are recognized and enforced by the courts, making arbitration a powerful tool. However, it should be kept in mind that the possibilities of appeal are limited. Our lawyers have extensive experience in representing clients in all stages of arbitration proceedings.
Arbitration has several important advantages:
Despite its advantages, arbitration has its disadvantages:
That's why it's important to have competent representation.
Lawyers who specialize in dispute resolution and contract law conduct arbitration. Their work includes:
KAASS LAW attorneys have decades of experience and a deep understanding of both the federal and California legal nuances of the process. We represent both corporate clients and individuals in arbitration disputes. According to the American Arbitration Association (AAA), a professional arbitration lawyer must be able to:
In addition, JAMS provides a detailed definition of arbitration and an explanation of the standards followed by arbitrators in the United States.
Arbitration may seem more informal than litigation, but that doesn't make it easy. Even if the case seems winnable at first, factors such as:
Can result in a loss, so the assistance of a qualified attorney is essential. KAASS LAW not only has an extensive practice, but also strategically builds a defense.
Arbitration is a powerful tool for those who want to avoid protracted litigation and reach a resolution quickly and confidentially. However, arbitration requires:
This is why the assistance of qualified counsel is critical. Our firm provides comprehensive services, including:
If you have a dispute that is subject to arbitration or would like to include an arbitration clause in a contract, contact us. Call 844-522-7752 for a free consultation.
This ground for Cancellation of Removal provides specific protections for certain non-permanent residents who have been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty in the United States by a U.S. citizen or Lawful Permanent Resident spouse or parent. The requirements include: ● Battered or Subjected to Extreme Cruelty: The applicant must demonstrate that they have been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty in the U.S. by their U.S. citizen or LPR spouse or parent. ● Good Moral Character (GMC) During the Period of Abuse: The applicant must have been a person of good moral character during the period of the abuse. ● Continuous Physical Presence in the U.S. for At Least 3 Years: The applicant must have been physically present in the United States for a continuous period of at least three years immediately preceding the date of application. Brief absences may not break continuity. ● Hardship: The deportation of the applicant must result in extreme hardship to the applicant or their U.S. citizen, LPR, or qualified alien child or parent. The hardship standard here is lower than the "exceptional and extremely unusual hardship" standard for non-LPR cancellation. ● Meritorious Basis for Relief: The applicant must establish that the claim for cancellation of removal merits a favorable exercise of discretion. If you or someone you know is facing deportation and believes they may be eligible for Cancellation of Removal, it is crucial to seek immediate legal advice from a qualified immigration attorney. An experienced attorney can assess the specific facts of the case, determine eligibility for any of these grounds, and provide guidance on the complex legal process.
Cancellation of Removal offers a way to avoid deportation for some, but strict rules apply regarding legal status, time in the US, good behavior, and no serious crimes. It's a judge's decision, weighing good and bad factors. If facing deportation, seek experienced legal help, like Kaass Law, to explore all options.
If you believe you've been discriminated against at your job, here are important steps you should take to protect your rights:
Act fast to protect your rights.
Bias is a tendency to favor or disfavor a certain person, group, or thing, often in an unfair way.1It can be based on prejudice or personal beliefs rather than objective facts.2In the context of workplace discrimination, bias refers to a prejudice against someone based on their protected characteristics like race, gender, age, religion, or disability, leading to unfair treatment in employment decisions or workplace practices.
Due to past criminal activity, there are a variety of ways that may effect a personal injury claim. An individual's criminal history may have an impact on their ability to pursue a personal injury claim in court. Again, with each case comes a different outcome due to the fact that everything for each case has to be carefully examined and the judgement has to be specified to each individual as the case pertains.
Some ways in which past criminal conduct may impair your personal injury claim are outlined above. If there is evidence tying you to committing a crime at the time of the accident, jurors may use it against you and reduce your settlement sum.
Have you been hurt in an accident caused by someone else's carelessness or purposeful act? You may be entitled to compensation for your injuries, but you should contact with a personal injury lawyer first. In addition, they may have the experience and expertise needed to help you file for your case. If you have been engaged in an accident caused by someone else's carelessness or willful behavior, you should get legal guidance from an expert lawyer to assist you with filing your case. If you or someone you know has been charged with a crime and would like to learn more about how this may influence your personal injury claim, please call our office immediately.
company, you can ensure that all interactions are handled professionally and strategically, preventing any missteps that could be used against you.
At "KAASS LAW", our legal team has figured out all the angles, and we have more than 20 years of experience in this field.
In short, contacting a lawyer after any accident, no matter how minor it seems, provides invaluable protection for your physical, financial, and legal well-being. It ensures you understand your rights, receive fair compensation for all damages, and avoid potential pitfalls in dealing with insurance companies. Give us a call at 844-522-7752 or visit our website at "KAASS LAW"
In CA search online for local urgent care or primary care options. For emergencies, always call 911. Don't delay if concerned. Have your insurance information ready. In case of serious injuries:
After these steps find a Personal Injury Attorney, who can help you to get compensation and fair settlements. Contact with our specialists at “KAASS LAW” Conclusion: Ultimately, taking immediate steps after an accident is vital. Getting prompt medical attention ensures that any injuries, even those not immediately obvious, are diagnosed and treated swiftly, which is key for your health and recovery. This medical documentation also becomes a critical foundation for protecting your legal rights and pursuing fair compensation. By prioritizing both your physical well-being and legal standing right away, you set yourself up for the best possible outcome. Consider reaching out to legal professionals like those at "KAASS LAW" to navigate the complexities of your situation.