Stay updated with the latest legal news, expert analysis, and firm updates from KAASS LAW.
Whether you're facing a legal challenge or seeking proactive counsel, our award-winning team is ready to defend your interests.
Ovens are among the most common kitchen pieces to contain defects that are significant enough to result in oven product liability lawsuits. These defects can merely be ones that don’t allow it to properly function, but they can also be dangerous, causing devastating damage to your belongings and even yourself and others. Some of these defects in oven product liability include:
If a defect in an oven led to damage to yourself, your family, or your property, there are several channels you can use to pursue compensation. When you gain legal representation and eventually sue the company based on their liability for the damage caused, your attorney can decide to sue based on several basis of defects, including:
If a faulty oven causes damage to your dwelling, your items inside the property, or even yourself and the people you live with, you have a claim to recovery for all of these damages and any pain and suffering that the damages may have been the cause. The first step to getting compensation is to gain legal representation and open a claim with the company who made the faulty product. You must do so within 2 years of the accident in California in order to be eligible for compensation. As mentioned before, you are entitled to compensation for damages to physical property and people. There are ways, however, that companies may try to avoid having to pay you. Here are some common defenses to product liability lawsuits:
If you or a loved one has been injured due to a oven product defect we invite you to contact our Los Angeles products liability attorney today at (310) 943-1171 today for a free consultation and case review. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aauCQGrjBB0&ab_channel=KaassLaw
California Penal Code Section 18710 prohibits the illegal possession of destructive devices other than fixed ammunition of a caliber greater than 0.60 inches.
The prosecutor must establish the following elements to prove that the defendant is guilty under California PC Section 18710 possessing destructive or explosive devices.
In California a destructive device is defined as the following:
According to 18 U.S. Code Section 1028, it is prohibited to knowingly transfer, possess, or use someone else's means of identification without lawful authority, with the intent to commit, aid, abet, or engage in any unlawful activity that violates federal law. Under 18 US Code Section 1028A aggravated identity theft is defined as the knowing and unauthorized possession, transfer, or use of a means of identification in the commission of certain felonies.
Exercise Equipment Product Liability is based on equipment that are very prone to causing injuries that result from their defects. Whether the accident happened at a gym, or at your own home, those involving exercise equipment can result in some of the most devastating injuries that arise from their defects, due to the nature of these products. These products cause tens of thousands of injuries every year, and some specific types of exercise equipment, such as treadmills, are among the most recalled products in America. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jk41OYNcWV4&feature=youtu.be
Creators of defective exercise equipment are liable for the damages when it is clear that the injuries or other damages arose directly due to the product defect. These damages can be to property that you own, or bodily damages in the form of injuries.
California Vehicle Code (CVC) 21955 states that “between adjacent intersections controlled by traffic control signal devices or by police officers, pedestrians shall not cross the roadway at any place except in a crosswalk.”
Jaywalking refers to when a pedestrian crosses a road with marked crosswalks or a marked intersection but does so from a point other than the designated crosswalk. Jaywalking laws protect both pedestrians and automobile drivers from avoidable car accidents. Law enforcement officers are unlikely to arrest you for jaywalking, but they will likely issue a ticket if they see you. In California, jaywalking is an infraction, and a first offense will cost you a minimum fine of $196. The DMV will not assess points onto your driving record.
As a pedestrian, it is your duty and your responsibility to keep yourself safe. In addition to abiding by jaywalking rules, here are some safety tips you can follow to ensure your safety when walking:
A judge issues a bench warrant, also called a "body attachment," as the most common arrest warrant in California. A judge issues a bench warrant, ordering the immediate arrest of a person. Judges issue bench warrants under California Penal Code sections 166 and 978.5. A bench warrant arises from a failure to follow the terms of a pre-existing offense. Not from the suspicion of criminal activity.
California judges can issue a bench warrant for failure to appear in court. If a person fails to appear for any scheduled court date, the judge can issue a California bench warrant. Failure to appear warrants constitute the most commonly issued bench warrants. Some examples include but are not limited to:
The right to privacy has two key aspects:
Invasion of privacy is tort-based, allowing a victim to bring a lawsuit against a person who illegally intrudes into their private life, publicizes them in a false light, discloses their private information, or appropriates their name for personal gain. In California, Public Disclosure of Private Facts is considered a form of invasion of privacy.
According to CACI 1801 to prove the claim of violation of a right of privacy the plaintiff must be able to establish the following elements:
California Penal Code Section 286(a) defines sodomy as sexual conduct involving contact between one person’s penis and another person’s anus. Any sexual penetration, no matter how slight, qualifies as sodomy.
To find the defendant guilty under Penal Code Section 286(a) for sodomy, the prosecution must prove the following elements:
A person who has been convicted of a felony in California has a chance to apply for Governor’s pardon. A Governor’s pardon is an honor that can be granted to an individual who can show excellent behavior and a law-abiding life following his conviction.
Generally, any person with a California state conviction is eligible to apply to the Governor for a pardon, a form of executive clemency--whenever an executive shows mercy in any form including pardon, reduction, stay. The Governor cannot pardon convictions from other states or federal and military convictions. People convicted in other states shall obtain a pardon in that state and people convicted in federal and military crimes can only be pardoned by the US president.
If a person is granted a pardon the following rights will be restored:
According to 18 USC 2422 and 2423, it is unlawful to engage in sexual activity and conduct with minors.
The prosecution must establish the following elements for convicting the defendant under 18 USC Sections 2422 and 2423
Under federal law illegal or illicit sexual conduct includes the following:
In California, there are many prohibited devices and weapons and some of them include bombs, missiles, rocket or grenade launchers, and land mines
According to California law possession of destructive devices can be actual and constructive. Actual possession is when the defendant has the dives in his physical possession. Constructive possession occurs when a defendant has control over the device but doesn’t have actual possession over it. Consequently, a defendant doesn’t have to actually touch or hold the device for it to qualify as a possession.
Penalties for a PC section 1817 conviction is a wobbler and can be punished as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the defendant’s criminal history and the case facts.
Penalties for misdemeanor penal code 18710 conviction include the following:
Penalties for felony penal code 18710 conviction include the following:
Under PC 18715 reckless or malicious possession of a destructive device in the following locations can increase the sentence:
The defendant will face felony penalties of two, four, or six years in state prison.
In case the prosecutor establishes that defendant had the intention to intimidate, injure, or terrify a person, or to wrongfully destroy or injure or property under PC 18740 the penalties include three, five, or seven years in state prison.
In case the defendant had malicious intent to injure another person with the device under under PC 18755 the penalties include five, seven, or nine years imprisonment in state prison.
In addition to state criminal liability, a person may be subject to federal liability. Under 18 U.S. Code § 844, it is unlawful to:
It is a federal crime to do so without a license. If the device is discovered during the commission of another crime or near critical facilities such as:
The case may be transferred to federal jurisdiction.
In addition to incarceration and fines, a conviction under the Explosives Possession Statute carries collateral consequences. These include:
And for aliens:
In addition, if the offense is found to be related to street gang activity, the court may order the convicted person to register as a gang member. Contact KAASS LAW at (310) 943-1171 for a consultation.
In case the defendant caused death to another person under PC 18755, the penalties include a life sentence without the possibility of parole.
Basically, 18 USC Section 1028A acts as an enhancement for federal defendants convicted of certain federal crimes listed in subsection "c" of Section 1028A. Aggravated identity theft provides for an extra mandatory consecutive sentence to any sentence imposed upon the underlying crime for a defendant who knowingly possessed, transferred, or used another person’s identification
The prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the following elements to convict the defendant of federal aggravated identity theft:
Means of identification is any name or number used, alone or together with any other information, to identify a person, including a name, date of birth, social security number, driver’s license or identification number, passport number, alien registration number, the taxpayer or employer identification number, routing code or electronic identification number.
The defendant may face criminal charges when the identity theft has not even occurred as the attempted identity theft carries the same penalties as the theft. Authorities treat conspiracy to commit identity theft in a similar way. Helping someone commit identity theft can also be considered a crime. Authorities can classify the unlawful actions as a crime, even if the defendant did not gain any financial benefit from using someone else's information.
The penalties for a 18 U.S Code 1028a Aggravated Identity Theft Conviction including the following: In addition to any punishment, the judge imposes for the underlying federal crime the defendant faces a minimum mandatory sentence of two years imprisonment for aggravated identity theft.
In case the underlying felony is related to terrorist activity the minimum mandatory sentence for aggravated identity theft increases from two years to five years imprisonment.
It is important to understand that a conviction for Aggravated Identity Theft is not subject to:
This means that the two years will be served after the base sentence, regardless of the circumstances. In addition, prior convictions for similar crimes may affect the sentence enhancement. The court may also consider:
Lawyers can build a defense based on lack of intent: if the defendant didn't know he or she was using someone else's identity. Or believed he or she had permission. The fact that there was a means of identification can also be challenged. In cases where the prosecution has not proven that the data used actually identifies a specific person.
Cases under 18 U.S. Code § 1028A are often investigated by the FBI, U.S. Secret Service, and immigration authorities, especially if the case involves international schemes, visas, or citizenship documents. If you are facing such charges, it is critical that you contact an experienced federal criminal defense attorney as soon as possible.
If you or a loved one is charged with federal aggravated identity theft, we invite you to contact our Glendale criminal defense attorney at KAASS LAW at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation and case review. Our staff speaks Spanish, Armenian, Russian, and French.
Here are some examples of situations where a manufacture would likely have to compensate the victim for damages:
There are plenty of possible defenses to a product liability lawsuit, but generally, all of these defenses espouse the same 3 things. They are:
Let’s apply these to our earlier examples:
See also: Injuries Caused by Defective Products Product Liability Oven Defects Motorcycle Part Defects Motorcycle Accidents Personal Injury Facebook
Drivers and pedestrians must share the road. They also share the responsibility for keeping themselves and each other safe by staying alert and abiding by traffic rules. If you injure yourself while jaywalking or injure someone who is jaywalking, you must determine who was at fault or more at fault for the accident.
If you injure yourself while jaywalking, you will likely share some fault for the accident. This doesn’t mean you won’t receive compensation, but we recommend seeking help from a Los Angeles pedestrian injury lawyer to avoid full responsibility. If you or a loved one were injured while crossing the street, contact KAASS LAW (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation.
Additionally, the judge may issue a bench warrant if a person indicted by a California grand jury is not present at the indicated time.
If a person willfully fails to appear in court after receiving a written promise to appear, the prosecution will charge them with "failure to appear" as a misdemeanor. This is punishable by up to one year in county jail and/or a maximum fine of up to $1,000.
If a person released on his own recognizance for a misdemeanor case willfully fails to appear in court within 14 days of a scheduled date, he will face additional charges of misdemeanor "failure to appear" for evading the process of the court. In this case, a person may face a fine of up to $1,000 and a sentence of up to six-month in county jail.
If a person released on their own recognizance for a felony case willfully fails to appear in court within 14 days of the scheduled date, the court will charge them with felony "failure to appear." A person may face a minimum fine of $5,000 and a sentence in a county jail or state prison. In case fail to appear in court involves a felony case where a person posted bail, the maximum fine increases from $5,000 to $10,000.
If a person willfully fails to pay court fines or ordered restitution the court may also issue a bench warrant. According to California Penal Code section 1203.04 a willful failure to pay a fine or restitution if a person has financial ability to do so is a misdemeanor and is punishable by up to one year in county jail
The court can also issue a bench warrant if a person fails to obey its orders. If a person fails to complete a report for drug-testing, community service, or court-ordered classes, the court will charge them with a probation violation.
California Penal Code section 1214.1 states that if a person fails to pay a fine on time, violates a written promise to appear in court, or disobeys a court order, the court may charge a penalty assessment of up to $300,000 and refer the case for collection. According to California Vehicle Code section 40508(d) if a person willfully fails to pay on time any fine or portion thereof due to a conviction for an infraction the court can also suspend his driver's license for 30 days.
In case you have a bench warrant out for your arrest, it is important to contact an experienced criminal attorney. Call (310) 943-1171 today for a free consultation. If you or a loved one has been issued a bench warrant, we invite you to contact our Glendale criminal defense attorney at KAASS LAW at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation and case review. Our staff speaks Spanish, Armenian, Russian, and French.
To recover on a claim for invasion of privacy based on public disclosure of private facts, the plaintiff needs to show that the disclosed information was private and not of legitimate concern to the public, and that disclosure would be highly offensive to any reasonable person. Furthermore, the plaintiff must show that the disclosure of facts was actually public in nature. In addition, the defendant can’t be liable when he merely gives further publicity to information about a plaintiff that is already public.
A reasonable member of the community may consider a private fact newsworthy if they could entertain a legitimate interest in it. Generally, courts recognize that the public has a legitimate interest in almost all current events, even if it contains private information about participants. Additionally, the public has a legitimate interest in the private lives of notorious or prominent figures, such as professional athletes, actors, actresses, public officers, and noted inventors.. In deciding whether the information was a matter of legitimate public concern the following factors must be concerned:
It is important to understand that not every disclosure of information is automatically an invasion of privacy. For example, if the information disclosed is already in the public domain, it is not a violation of the law to disclose it. In California, there is a principle that facts that have been previously published or are public knowledge cannot be the basis of a lawsuit. In addition, it has been held that when a person voluntarily discloses certain information to the public, he or she loses the protection of privacy with respect to that information.
With the development of technology, the number of cases involving the publication of private information on the Internet has increased significantly. The digital environment sometimes makes it difficult to determine whether information has actually been made public. However, courts are increasingly recognizing online postings as sufficient grounds for a case. For example, posting personal medical or financial information without the victim's consent. Courts treat this type of conduct as a serious invasion of privacy, and individuals who engage in it may face civil liability, including potential lawsuits and financial penalties.
The compensatory damages a victim can recover depend on the specific facts of a case. Here are some common examples of damages:
Do you need additional information regarding a specific situation that you or a loved one face? KAASS LAW attorneys you should be able to provide you with legal assistance regarding the matter.
If you suspect that your privacy rights have been violated, KAASS LAW is here to help. We will provide:
The penalties for a sodomy conviction under Penal Code Sections 286(b)(1), 286(e), and 286(h) are wobblers. The court may charge the defendant with either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the case circumstances and the defendant’s criminal history.
The penalties for a misdemeanor sodomy conviction include:
The penalties for a felony sodomy conviction include:
Penalties for a felony California Penal Code Section 286(b)(2) conviction include:
Penalties for a felony California Penal Code Section 286(d) conviction include:
All remaining convictions under California PC Section 286 carry the following penalties:
Facing charges under California Penal Code 286? Contact KAASS LAW at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation and case review. Our staff speaks Spanish, Armenian, Russian, and French.
A Governor’s pardon does not restore the following rights and limitations:
Direct pardon application is available to individuals who are ineligible for a COR. A person must use the direct pardon process in case he was convicted of a crime in California and now reside outside the state.
A person must first complete the Application for Executive Clemency. After that, he must send the Notice of Intent to Apply for Executive Clemency to the District Attorney in each county where he was convicted. Once notice is given, a person must submit the Application for Executive Clemency to the Office of Governor.
Once the Governor’s Office receives a direct pardon application or a Certificate of Rehabilitation, the Office usually forwards it to the Board of Parole Hearings. The Board can conduct an investigation, contact the investigating law enforcement agency or the District Attorney and make a proposal on whether a pardon should be granted or not. In case the person has been convicted of more than one felony, the California Supreme Court must give its recommendation on granting a pardon to him before the Governor can do so. Also see Criminal Law Also see Court Forms
Under federal law, a minor is any person under the age of 18. There are some exceptions to the definition of a minor, where the minor is a person under the age of 16.
Any person can be an offender. The law does not limit the offender to one person. Anyone who intentionally and knowingly assists in coercion, transportation, or sexual activity can face prosecution.
Depending on the case circumstances federal solicitation of a minor can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony. In case the defendant is convicted of using internet, mail, or any other form of interstate or international communication to solicit or attempt to solicit of a minor with the intention to engage in illegal sexual activity, or he successfully transported the child for the illegal sexual activity, he can face:
According to 18 Section 2423, the defendant is charged with traveling to another state, coming to the US, or traveling internationally and engaging in unlawful sexual activity with a person under 18, he will face:
Additionally, punishment for any federal sex crime is usually accompanied by an obligation to join the national sex registry. The registry compiles the information of sex offenders across all states and can have a severe impact on offender’s ability to find employment and keep a residence. The offender must register as a sex offender for 15 years, 25 years, or for life. Failing to register can result in a separate criminal charge, carrying up to 10 years in federal prison and significant fines.
After serving their sentence, most individuals are subject to federal supervision for a period ranging from 5 years to life. Violation of these conditions will result in a second prosecution. Supervision may include:
The court may order a mandatory forensic psychological evaluation. If it is determined that the defendant is prone to reoffending, compulsory treatment is possible. Authorities carry out the process both in places of detention and after release. These measures aim to minimize the risk
The law requires any person convicted of a qualifying sex offense to register in the national sex offender registry and to keep their information updated as mandated by legal authorities. Failure to register is punishable as a separate offense. The term of registration is 15, 25 years or life. However, failure to register is punishable by up to 10 years in prison.
KAASS LAW provides legal assistance at all stages. Contact us for an evaluation of your situation.