Stay updated with the latest legal news, expert analysis, and firm updates from KAASS LAW.
Whether you're facing a legal challenge or seeking proactive counsel, our award-winning team is ready to defend your interests.
Several United States Senators, including Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, have proposed a bill, called the Sensible Taxation and Equity Promoted (STEP) Act.
STEP Act would allow individuals to exclude up to $1 million in unrealized capital gains from tax, which are the potential profits from an asset, as well as to pay the tax in installments over a 15-year period for capital gains that apply to any illiquid asset like a farm or business. See below for more details on how illiquid assets affect the process.
To better understand how the STEP Act works, here is an example: if someone dies holding $7 million in property for which they paid $4 million for, they would only pay taxes on $1 million of that $2 million gain. Additionally, if someone dies holding $3 million in property assets for which they paid $2 million for, none of that $1 million gain would be taxable.
Currently, it seems that assets held in a retirement account would not be subject to capital gain taxes under this Act.
Currently, it seems that gifts and bequests would be exempt from the capital gain taxes under this Act.
During an individual’s lifetime, any completed transfer to a trust or to any individual other than a spouse will allow for the first $100,000 of cumulative gain to be tax free. However, any excess will be subject to a transfer tax after the first $100,000. Second, this Act will eliminate the ability to use trusts to transfer property or sell other assets. Non-grantor trusts, which is a trust where the grantor retains certain powers over the trust, would have to report gain on all of their appreciated assets every 21 years. Third, this Act would require trusts more than $1 million of assets or more than $20,000 of gross income to provide additional information to the IRS, including a balance sheet, income statement, and list all trustees, grantors, and beneficiaries.
Items transferred to a spouses, charitable trusts, qualified disability trusts, charity, and cemetery trusts are exempt from the tax.
Illiquid property is property that is not easily sold. Common examples of illiquid property include businesses and farms. For STEP Act purposes, the law will affect transfers of illiquid property. Thus, property owners can pay the tax over a 15-year period. It would be interest only for up to 5 years and then 10 equal payments for the remaining 10 years. However, selling the property would require payment in full. KAASS LAW guides you through the STEP Act with expert legal advice tailored to your needs.
A particular focus of the STEP Act is the impact on illiquid assets such as:
Owners of such assets will be able to spread their capital gains tax liability over 15 years. This is a relief to those who own such businesses where the value of the assets may make it difficult to sell. This will allow owners of farms or businesses to avoid immediate tax consequences. Instead, they will be able to pay taxes gradually. This allows them to continue to operate their business or farm without serious financial hardship. However, when the asset is sold, the tax is paid in full. This also helps owners avoid asset sales that could result in the loss of the asset.
The STEP Act will provide owners with significant tax relief in the event of the death of the asset owner. It allows assets to pass without paying capital gains tax if they are worth less than $1 million. This innovation will be an important step in preserving family businesses and farms. It will allow for long-term succession planning without significant financial loss. It is important to note, however, that the transition to a 15-year capital gains tax system may present certain risks. If market conditions change or the owner's financial situation deteriorates, meeting tax obligations may become problematic. It is also important that asset owners properly plan and document all their transactions. This will help avoid potential legal exposure.
The STEP Act limits the use of trusts and other wealth transfer instruments. This may make it difficult to transfer assets between families or between businesses. It is important to consult with professional legal counsel to avoid tax liability issues.
To learn more about how the STEP Act may affect your tax situation, contact KAASS LAW. Our experienced attorneys can help you understand how the new laws may affect your assets and assist you in developing an effective tax planning strategy.
A common carrier is an individual or business that advertises to the public that it is available for hire to transport people or property in exchange for a fee. A typical example is Uber or Lyft services.
A common carrier must exercise the utmost care and be careful so as to protect their passengers on board. Additionally, the driver of Uber/Lyft ride is responsible to warn fellow passengers should there be any potentially dangerous condition they know of that may harm the passengers on board. For example, an Uber driver should warn their passenger if one of the seatbelts in the car is not properly working so that the passenger may use another seatbelt instead.
Common carrier responsibilities ensure the safety of passengers as well as others that are sharing the road. Some examples of responsibilities include:
According to the Corporation Code of California, the types of corporate structure within Californian jurisdiction are divided into two broad categories:
The persons who have formed partnerships are known as partners, while shareholders are persons who own one of the shares of a corporation. Therefore, the differences arising among the partners/shareholders within partnership/corporation are referred to as partnership and shareholder disputes.
When the business involves two or more people, sooner or later the disagreements between them become inevitable. Partners/shareholders usually succeed in ironing out the differences based on mutual understanding given the common business interest. Unlike it, sometimes disagreements have deep roots full of possible grave consequences for the business. Such disagreements may refer to many different circumstances in connection with the collision of business interests, opposite ideas, breaches, etc.
The practice shows that more frequently the factors described below do cause or at least contribute to such disputes:
California Vehicle Code does not have any limitations with regards to the age of drivers, that's why it is easy to notice both young and old drivers on roads. However, senior-aged drivers can have more problems while driving and can cause more car accidents. The reasons for the above mentioned are very simple-the physical conditions of the elderly drivers do not let to drive more carefully. For example, a driver of a senior age can suffer from problems with eyesight, thus can fail to notice any marks and signs on the roads. Not hearing the traffic can also become a problem and lead to car accidents.
California law requires drivers that are 70 years or older to renew their drivers license.
As mentioned above, you must complete the driving license renewal process in person to allow the DMV to evaluate your condition before deciding. The DMV may require the elderly driver to undergo a medical evaluation to assess their physical and mental condition. The medical evaluation shall include:
It is a common issue both for ordinary citizens and public figures, as well as companies to suffer harm to their reputation. California law allows them to sue for compensation of such damages. The law classifies the damages to reputation into several groups, which include:
Defamation is the spread of false statements, which is done to cause damage to one's reputation. Slander is the disclosure of such statements verbally and libel is such disclosure, which is done in writing.
The elements a plaintiff must establish to successfully sue a third party for defamation are the following:
Car accidents, unfortunately, happen every day and cause damages to both the vehicle leading to negative economic consequences to drivers but also their life and health. Car accidents are caused by different reasons such as hydroplane car accidents, accidents involving elderly drivers, and ordinary accidents happening because of the negligence of the drivers. One of the types of car accidents is defective tire accidents.
Manufacturing defects are related to such issues, which, arising during production, make the tire differ from particular specifications.
Design defects are considered to be in place if the tire doesn't perform as safely as it can be expected by an ordinary customer and place risk of danger on the latter.
In the case of the manufacturer, the designer does not provide instructions, safety warnings to the use of the tires and lead them to cause damages, it is considered that the tire had a warning defect.
When police officers pull a driver over for suspicion of drunk driving, the breathalyzer is one of the most common tools used to determine whether the driver was in fact driving under the influence. A driver must blow into the breathalyzer test, which then determines the driver's blood alcohol content. Unfortunately, using a breathalyzer may result in false positives due to a number of factors that can throw the machine off. Below are some of the more common factors.
Your metabolism rate can also adversely affect a breathalyzer reading. For example, if your metabolism is slow, then your body may take longer to absorb the alcohol, and the breathalyzer reading may appear to be higher than the actual amount of alcohol in your blood stream.
The breathalyzer is made to detect alcohol in the mouth. Unfortunately, the machine cannot distinguish when the driver consumed the alcohol. Thus, traces of alcohol in the mouth, absorbed from food in between the teeth or even mouthwash may show a higher reading of blood alcohol content.
It is important to understand that there are strict rules regarding the use of a breathalyzer by law enforcement officers. Failure to follow these rules may be grounds for excluding the test results from evidence in court. For example, a police officer must observe a suspect for at least 15 minutes before administering the test. During this time, the driver may not:
Getting compensation for medical bills and expenses is the first thing that comes to anyone's mind after an suffering injuries from an auto accident. Usually, the at fault party responsible for the accident or the injuries should be liable for your medical expenses. However, they do not usually pay compensation immediately after the accident. To better understand the medical bill's compensation process, let's examine it part by part.
As discussed, the liable party or their insurer is responsible for your medical bills, but they typically don't compensate immediately. If you're waiting for a settlement or trial, your insurance company—private or government—can pay your bills. However, there are also common causes, when the injured party does not have health insurance.
The legal regulations allow giving discount or payment plans to uninsured parties or to any person "whose income does not exceed 350% of federal poverty level" Another option is "medical lien". It lets the healthcare provider receive payment from the personal injury case's judgment or settlement. This mechanism lets the patient pay after resolving the case. However, few hospitals or medical organizations will agree to this scheme, as they risk not receiving payment if the case fails. This scheme can also be risky for you as if you do not succeed with your case, you shall be liable for the remaining part of the expenses. If you have insurance but doubt whether you should use it or give a medical lien, it is recommended to use the insurance. If you use it, the medical help providers cannot charge you in full rate, exceeding your contract rate. Also, in the case of insurance, you have more options for healthcare providers to choose from. To sum up, choose your insurance unless you lack it or your insurance doesn't cover the services you need.
While, many people may enjoy rainy weather, rainy weather also becomes a problem for drivers and often times lead to traffic accidents. Particularly, rainy weather is a reason for most hydroplaning accidents.
Hydroplaning is a term describing "sliding and skidding" of a vehicle across a wet surface. It also means the vehicle’s tires contact more water, causing them to displace and lose traction. This causes drivers to lose control over the brakes of the vehicle.
The main cause of the accidents is bad weather. However, there is also another reason for such accidents. Mechanical reasons can also cause them. Particularly, poor tire tread or poor tire pressure can lead to failure to keep control over the car. Among such factors, a driver's negligence can cause car accidents. Particularly, drivers must not exceed the speed of a vehicle in bad weather conditions, and failing to slow down can lead to a hydroplane accident. However, others can also be responsible for the accident, which is a ground for the driver to seek compensation for damages.
Aside from the negligent party, road defects can often cause hydroplane accidents. As such, the government may also be an at-fault party in hydroplane accidents if there was a defect in the road. The government must design and construct roads to maintain safety and prevent dangerous road incidents. In the event you believe that a hydroplane accident was caused by defective road conditions, you must file a within 6 months of the accident with the appropriate government agency. Other drivers' negligence can also lead to the occurrence of hydroplane accidents.
Have you ever thought that there are special requirements for building stairs or stairwells? Almost everyone has slipped on stairs and even fell, some of us have got serious injuries and some of us, fortunately, don't break any bones. Is it possible to get compensation for being damaged in a stairway accident or what has happened is only your fault?
As mentioned already, there are special requirements for stairs under California Residential Code. These requirements concern the width and height of such stairs, tread depth, slip resistance, etc. This means that if the constructor fails to meet the requirements or the house owner doesn't maintain the stairs clean and in good repair, the house owner may be responsible for the accidents. Thus, the stair accident claims shall be based on negligence or product liability of:
Let’s examine the grounds for the liability of each of them.
A common carrier can hold responsibility for injuries a passenger sustains. The idea here is that when an individual becomes a passenger in an Uber or Lyft, the passenger is essentially putting themselves under the Uber or Lyft driver’s control. Thus, the driver of Uber or Lyft has a special duty of care towards the passengers that board Uber or Lyft. Typically, proving negligence of a common carrier means showing that the Uber or Lyft driver violated the law or by showing that the driver failed to act reasonably in using care and diligence expected of a cautious Uber or Lyft driver.
To establish common carrier liability, the injured party must prove these key elements:
For example, if an Uber driver ran a red light and caused an accident, this could be direct evidence of a breach of the duty of care.
There are times, however, when a common carrier may not be liable. For example:
However, even if the passenger is partially at fault, California has a comparative negligence rule. This means that the court may apportion some of the fault between the parties.
Passengers injured as a result of a common carrier's negligence may be able to recover for:
In some cases, punitive damages may be available if it can be shown that the transportation company intentionally disregarded safety.
These companies may be held liable in certain situations. For example:
As you can see, Uber and Lyft are not only required to vet their drivers, but also to ensure that their services are functioning properly. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in legal liability for the companies, in addition to the drivers themselves.
It is important to remember that California has strict statutes of limitations for personal injury lawsuits:
Failure to seek legal counsel in a timely manner may result in the loss of your right to compensation. That is why it is important to contact an experienced attorney immediately after the incident.
If you or someone you know has been injured in an Uber or Lyft ride, contact our Los Angeles UBER accident lawyer at (310) 943-1171. Our attorneys can provide you with any sort of legal assistance you require.
If you have been injured while riding with Uber, Lyft, or another transportation company, seek help immediately. The attorneys at KAASS LAW are experienced in transportation negligence cases and are ready to stand up for your rights. We can help you get fair compensation and guide you through every step of the legal process. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyD1x6BCMWs
In some cases, there are laws aimed at resolving shareholder disputes within the legal procedure. For instance, in the process of voluntary dissolution of a corporation, the minority shareholder’s rights may be violated while distributing corporation assets to the shareholders entitled thereto, so they may fight it by the legal tools vested by the Corporation Code of California. In particular, according to the latter, upon the petition of shareholders who hold shares representing 5 percent the court may take jurisdiction over the voluntary winding-up proceeding if that appears necessary for the protection of any parties. The court, if it assumes jurisdiction, may make such orders as to any matters concerning the winding up of the affairs of the corporation and for the protection of its shareholders. In short, the shareholder dispute described above could be resolved by the interference of a court for the protection of the shareholder rights.
There is a range of methods to resolve such disputes. Among others, they may include:
We believe that the most effective and practical way would be entrusting an attorney to reach a settlement in conditions best for your interests.
If you need legal assistance when you find settling such disputes is beyond your powers, we invite you to contact an attorney at KAASS LAW at (310) 943-1171 and speak to our Glendale business attorney to assist with the process.
The following medical conditions can be a reason to suspend your driving license:
The DMV also considers the medications elderly people use to treat illnesses, as their side effects can cause drowsiness and dizziness, impairing driving.
The common sources which DMV has to assess driving conditions of the elderly person can be:
In the event there are threatening physical or mental conditions, the DMV can ask you to submit a DMV driver medical evaluation regarding your medical history with your doctor. Another option is to ask for re-examination (including a driving performance test).
Pursuant to California Vehicle Code 14100, you can challenge the revocation at DMV administrative hearings. The period for such a request is 10 days after receiving the notice of revocation. If the hearing result is unsatisfactory and the license does not renew, the next step involves the department reviewing the case. The period for submitting for this review is 15 days after receiving the decision. In any case, you have the right to challenge the decision in court if neither the 14100 hearing nor the department review gives any result. The period is:
There are a number of steps older drivers can take to keep their license. First and foremost:
This will allow you to monitor your health and identify potential problems early. Older drivers are also advised to have their vision checked in a timely manner. Be sure to wear corrective lenses if necessary. In addition, it is important to avoid taking medications while driving that cause:
To successfully pass a DMV recertification, a driver should prepare in advance. You can take additional training at a driving school or take a few lessons with an instructor. It's also a good idea to study the current rules of the road and take practice tests.
In some cases, the DMV may impose restricted driving conditions instead of suspending a driver's license altogether. For example, a driver may only be allowed to drive during daylight hours. Such restrictions allow you to maintain your mobility while minimizing the risk to public safety. Contact KAASS LAW for advice and representation.
Experienced and professional legal assistance can help you to challenge the DMV decisions and renew your license-restoring your right of driving. We invite you to contact KAASS LAW at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation on your case and further assistance.
Under California law defamation is "per se" is statements that are damaging on its face without the need of further explanations. An example of defamation per se includes for instance a false accusation that someone committed a crime or is unfit to practice in their particular profession. In case defamation is "per quod", the victim shall prove that the spread of a false statement causes damages. Examples of such damages can include lost profits, employment, negative consequences, a decrease of customers for a business, etc.
Under California law, public disclosure of private facts is a form of invasion of privacy. To get compensation for damages, the plaintiff must prove the following:
An example of public disclosure of private facts include publishing statements of your best friend's diagnosis or some intimate content to public media without his/her consent. The court decides the existence of a "private act" on a case-by-case basis, based on what an ordinary person considers private and offensive if disclosed. Physical persons have the right to sue for such kind of harm in one year from the date of disclosure.
Business disparagement refers to:
For example, a supermarket publishes information in a public newspaper that its competitor’s products do not comply with the applicable governmental standards.
A corporation has 2 years to file an action for compensation of disparagement after the statements' publishing and dissemination. The plaintiff shall prove the existence of the following elements to seek compensation of damages:
The dissemination of such statements can be conducted both orally and in writing. You can prove the loss of income in business disparagement by showing invoices, tax returns, and bank account statements of the company. For harm to reputation victims mostly recover such damages as:
California law provides victims of defamation not only the right to recover damages, but also other remedies. In addition to economic damages, plaintiffs may seek compensation for emotional distress. This includes:
In some cases, punitive damages may be awarded. These are awarded to punish the guilty party and to deter similar actions in the future. However, in order for the court to grant such a claim, the plaintiff must prove malice on the part of the defendant. In addition to monetary damages, the court may award injunctive relief. This means that the defendant must stop spreading false information. It is important to note that defamation is especially important in the digital media age. Lies posted on the Internet can spread quickly and cause significant damage. Therefore, if such publications are identified, it is important to contact a qualified attorney immediately.
If your or a loved one's believe that you have suffered defamation by a third party we invite you to contact our Los Angeles Personal Injury attorneys at KAASS LAW (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation.
As discussed above, if it is believed that the case of an accident arose out of a defective tire, the liable party of said accident may include:
Generally, to prove that the defect of a tire was the reason for the accident, an qualified expert would testify in the form of expert testimony. Common examples that the expert would need to testify to includes:
You shall also prove that you used the tire in a foreseeable manner and the defects occurred before your use of the vehicle. Expert's opinion shall also assist you with this evidence.
Family members are entitled to file such lawsuits and receive compensation. The family members having such rights are:
Other common losses
Compensation in a defective tire lawsuit can include the following:
The defendant can bring different arguments supporting his position, such as that the tires were affected not by his fault but by your negligent use. For this reason, it is essential to receive professional assistance and consult an experienced attorney.
If you or a loved one has been in a defective tire accident, contact our Los Angeles Personal Injury attorney at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation and case review. Our attorneys will evaluate the details of your case and let you know what to expect and how you can proceed.
Violation of this requirement may result in erroneous results as residual alcohol may distort the readings. In addition, the officer must be certified to use the device. And the device itself must be registered and tested for proper functioning. Otherwise, the defense attorney may question the validity of the data obtained.
In the event of a dispute over the accuracy of a breathalyzer reading, a second chemical blood test is available. This method is considered more accurate and can reveal discrepancies between the reading and the actual blood alcohol content. If the blood test shows a lower alcohol level, it can be used in court in the defendant's favor. An attorney may also request access to the maintenance records of a particular instrument. If you don’t calibrate the instrument on time, the court may rule the evidence inadmissible.
Although California adheres to the principle of implied consent to take a breathalyzer test, a driver has the right to refuse to take the test. However, doing so may result in administrative consequences. Including automatic license suspension for up to one year. At the same time, refusal can be used as an argument against the driver in court, although it is not direct evidence of guilt. If you suspect that the breathalyzer was defective, the presence of a refusal does not deprive you of the right to defend yourself. A qualified attorney will be able to present arguments on your behalf and minimize possible risks.
You should also consider whether your rights were respected during the stop. If the police did not have a reasonable basis for the stop, any evidence subsequently obtained may be considered inadmissible. For example, the lack of evidence of a traffic violation may be grounds to challenge the legality of the police action.
Certain health issues of a driver may throw a breathalyzer test off and show a false high blood alcohol content. For example, a driver with diabetes experiencing hyperglycemia, or high blood sugar, may trigger a false high blood alcohol content on the breathalyzer.
Authorities must properly maintain the breathalyzer to produce accurate results. This means that authorities must constantly recalibrate breathalyzers. Thus, should a police officer fail to calibrate the machine, false high blood alcohol content may result.
If the police accused you of driving under the influence based on a breathalyzer reading, don’t give up. There are numerous circumstances that can affect the validity of the test results and the course of a criminal case. The attorneys at KAASS LAW can help you analyze the legality of the test. call (310) 341-711 for a consultation. Our DUI attorneys will help determine your case and whether you have any feasible defenses.
Medical expenses after a car accident can include a wide range of services. For example, they may include not only the initial hospitalization, but also subsequent recovery:
In the case of serious injuries, there may also be long-term costs, including:
In a personal injury case, it is possible to seek compensation for anticipated future medical needs. To do this, you will need to provide a doctor's opinion as to the length and cost of treatment. For example, if the injured person will need surgery six months after the accident, his or her attorney can include that amount in the claim.
In such a case, the injured person has the right to file a civil lawsuit against the driver or other responsible parties personally. Alternatively, you can use your underinsured motorist coverage, if available. However, this can be difficult in practice if the defendant does not have enough assets to cover the claim.
The statute of limitations in California personal injury cases is two years from the date of the accident. If you miss this deadline, you may lose your right to compensation. It is important to start the process early in order to preserve all evidence and file a timely claim.
Insurance companies have subrogation rights for a personal injury claim. Subrogation right means that your insurance company can recover your medical expenses from the party who was liable for the injuries. Your insurer shall also have the right to sue the liable party on your behalf.
Claiming compensation for medical expenses is not an easy process. You still need a professional attorney to assist you with evaluations of your case, negotiations for a larger settlement. Professional legal assistance is crucial if you seek compensation for pre-existing injuries that worsened as a result of the accident.
The attorneys at KAASS LAW have extensive experience handling auto accident and medical expense cases. We can help you accurately calculate all of your costs and properly file a claim for compensation. Call us at (310) 943-1171 to schedule a free consultation and start protecting your rights.
Cases involving dangerous roads are specific and complex. Proving that a badly constructed road caused your accident can be very challenging. In other words, it can be difficult, but at the same time essential to prove the direct link between your accident and negligence of, for instance, governmental bodies. Collecting evidence after an auto accident is important. As such, you should do the following:
The court usually evaluates compensation based on the accident's impact on your health and financial conditions. In the event you suffered injuries due to a hydroplane car accident, you can expect to receive compensation for:
Based on the complexity of the case, it is mandatory to have a professional lawyer on your side to assist with the evidence-gathering process and support your claim.
While many aquaplaning accidents occur unexpectedly, there are preventative measures that can be taken. They can significantly reduce the risk of aquaplaning. Check tire pressure and tire wear regularly. It is also important to avoid sharp turns and braking on wet roads, and to slow down at the first sign of rain. This is when the asphalt becomes particularly slippery due to the mixture of water and road dust.
In California, insurance companies play a key role in personal injury claims. However, insurance adjusters often try to minimize their payouts. Especially when it comes to disputed fault. It is important to remember that your insurance company's claims can be used against you. For this reason, it is highly recommended that you first consult with an attorney.
Aquaplaning accident victims should be aware of the statute of limitations. In California, it is two years from the date of the accident. If you are filing a lawsuit against a government entity, you must first file a claim within six months. Failure to meet these deadlines may disqualify you from receiving compensation. Contact KAASS LAW if you have any questions regarding aquaplaning. We are ready to help you protect your rights and seek justice.
If you or a loved one have been injured in a hydroplaning car accident, we invite you to contact KAASS LAW (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation with a Los Angeles auto accident attorney today. Our attorneys will help you determine the liable party and proceed accordingly.
If the stairs haven't met the requirements and the injury results from defective stair surfaces or rails, the manufacturer or seller is liable for the defects and injuries under product liability laws. In other words, under such laws, the liability arises for anyone, who:
In order for liability to attach on a stairway manufacture, designer, seller, distributor or contractor the Plaintiff must prove the following elements:
Often times, it can be more problematic to recover damages from an employee of a company, rather than the construction company itself. However, the corresponding legal regulations provide the possibility to recover damages from the employers for negligence of the employees, because the employer shall be vicariously liable for such actions. It is just essential to prove that the negligent employee while constructing the stairs, was acting within the scope of his employment.
Can a property owner be liable for the damages to the victim? Yes, a property owner has a duty of care for keeping the property in a safe condition. Duty of care is shown by either fixing the issues with the stairway or at least warning the persons about the problems. Thus, if such actions have not been conducted and as a result, an accident took place, the property owner will be held liable for compensating the damages. Generally, the owner's insurance policy covers such compensation. However, if the policy is insufficient, the owner must pay "from their own pockets." The following factors are often taken into account for determining the owner's liability:
A injured party in a stairway slip and fall accident has a number of remedies. The injured party can receive compensation for the following expenses:
Of course, often times, the insurance company will try to blame you for the occurred accident for at least sharing the expenses and not compensating you the whole amount. As such, collecting valuable evidence such as photos or videos of the stairway, details of witnesses of your stairway accident, your medical record of treatment after the accident is very essential. Getting professional legal assistance will help you to efficiently plan your steps for getting the compensation.
If you or your loved one had a stairway accident, contact our Los Angeles premises liability attorneys today. KAASS LAW (310) 943-1171 for a free constellation and case review.