Stay updated with the latest legal news, expert analysis, and firm updates from KAASS LAW.
Whether you're facing a legal challenge or seeking proactive counsel, our award-winning team is ready to defend your interests.
Yes, it is a crime in California to knowingly report a false emergency under Penal Code 148.3. Namely, it is a crime to make a report or cause a report to be made to any city, county, city, or state department, district, agency, division, commission, or board, that an emergency exists when in reality an emergency does not exist.
For purposes of making a false report of an emergency, an emergency includes any condition that does, or could result in, the response of any public official to any condition that can jeopardize public safety, evacuation of an area, or activates AMBER alert.
Penalties for making a false report of an emergency may include being charged with a misdemeanor with up to one year in county jail and a maximum fine of $1,000.
Here are some examples that would likely result in making a false report of an emergency:
Yes, there are instances where making a false report of an emergency can be charged as a felony should the false alarm result in someone suffering great bodily injury or death.
Great bodily injury is determined by how severe the injury to the person is. Thus, the following factors are typically considered:
Have you or someone you know has been charged with making a false report of an emergency? If so, experienced attorneys at KAASS Law are here to help protect your rights. Get in touch with us to go over the details of your case by contacting (310) 943-1171
Disputes can emerge when more than one individual owns a piece of property. When co-owners are unable or unwilling to decide what to do with their real estate, the process of buying out the owners or selling the property and distributing the proceeds can be extremely complicated. A partition action may be the best way to resolve a real estate dispute amongst co-owners.
There are many reasons for partition actions to take place. They all originate from multiple owners claiming ownership of the same piece of real estate. For instance, let's say two people co-own a property. One of them does not want to co-own the property anymore. This results in a partition action. There are two types of partition actions: partition in kind and partition by sale.
Physical borders divide the land amongst co-owners. This divides the property into smaller, personalized portions, each held by a single person, rather than one large piece co-owned by numerous persons. In California, the courts may mandate a partition in kind as one option to resolve a partition case. This leaves each individual with an independent ownership share of the property. When California courts mandate partition in kind, they must award each co-owner an "equitable portion" of the property. Each co-owner gets a fair division of land. For instance, if a court divides a 10-acre plot of land between two co-owners, the court will not automatically give each of the five acres. This problem develops when one part of the land is more valuable than the rest due to its closeness to a road, a beach, or other land feature.
California law implicitly grants tenants the right to enjoy their rented property without “substantial interference” by their landlord. All California tenants are legally entitled to this right. It is infringed upon when a landlord or someone working for them interferes with their ability to enjoy their dwelling and live in it peacefully. This can also be violated if the landlord fails to prevent another tenant from violating someone’s right to quiet enjoyment.
Just because California tenants have a right to quiet enjoyment, it does not mean that any annoyance by the landlord would result in a violation of this right. The law states that there must be “substantial interference,” which is a legally vague term but tends to include actions that are repeated and/or prevent the tenant from quietly enjoying their space for an extended period of time. Some examples would include:
According to California Penal Code Section 278, child abduction is malicious taking, enticing, keeping, withholding, or concealing a child with the intention to detain or conceal the child from his legal custodian.
The prosecutor must establish the following elements to prove that defendant is guilty of PC 278 child abduction:
Wage garnishment allows an individual’s earnings to be withheld by an employer for the payment of a debt such as a child support.
According to the California Code, Family Code section 5206, earnings include:
Yes, there is a maximum wage amount that can be subject to garnishment. Under the Consumer Credit Protection Act’s Tile III, the maximum allowable garnishment from disposable earnings cannot exceed 50% if the worker is supporting another spouse or child, or up to 60% if the worker is not. Furthermore, an additional 5% may be garnished for support payments more than 12 weeks in debt.
The great path to recovery from substance abuse is not fair for all who walk the line. That trail is challenging and not easy to achieve. In order to do so, victims seeking help rely on licensed and reputable rehabilitation facilities for their recovery. CA's operation of drug and alcohol treatment centers is strictly regulated in order to sustain safety, quality of care, and ethical practices within these vital healthcare services. When it comes to understanding the licensing world, this is extremely important for both the person who is in recovery and the caretaker who is facilitating these rehab centers. The following are FAQs regarding drug rehabilitation licensing.
A license is required for providing nonmedical services such as the following:
California's legal world is always changing and adapting for modernization to constantly evolve. To respond and not get outdated, there always needs to have new legislation so it may clarify and strengthen consumer protection. For instance, CA Assembly Bill Number 901 (AB 901) represents an important development in consumer protection, impacting different aspects of business practices and consumer rights within the state. Here at KAASS, we're committed to keeping our clients and or readers well-informed and strive to understand these changes.
While the main focus of AB 901 can vary depending on the final enacted version and its chapter within California law. Going further, such bills often aim to address specific gaps or ambiguities in existing regulations. Furthermore, they can introduce better transparency, protect vulnerable parties, and or modernize legal frameworks in response to evolving societal needs. Additionally, this is a modern step towards technological advancements. So in a way, think of this as a "legislative update". Understanding the core intent behind AB 901 is crucial to understanding its practical effects.
The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 provides financial relief to small businesses that have been impacted by COVID-19. The Act provides funding in some of the following ways:
The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 authorizes Small Business Administration (SBA) to establish the Community Navigator Pilot Program (CNPP).
SBA is committed to ensuring that small businesses get support from federal relief programs. Such programs can provide economic relief to small businesses that have been affected by COVID-19. The focus of this program is to reach and support underserved small businesses, which includes but are not limited to, micro and rural businesses, businesses owned by women, veterans, and other socially and economically disadvantaged individuals.
Penal Code section 597 pertains to animal abuse and cruelty. It is illegal under Penal Code section 597 for an individual to maliciously kill, harm, maim, or torture an animal.
The penalties associated with a violation of Penal Code section 597 are treated as a wobbler. In other words, a violation of this penal code can be charged as either a misdemeanor or felony. Should the prosecuting agency decide to treat the violation as a misdemeanor, an individual can face up to one year in county jail and may pay fines of up to $20,000. On the other hand, should the prosecuting agency decide to treat the violation as a felony, an individual may face up to three (3) years in state prison and may pay fines of up to $20,000.
For purposes of Penal Code 597, maiming refers to the act of intentionally disabling or disfiguring an animal in a manner that results in permanent damage. This includes the deliberate removal or permanent impairment of a limb, organ, or any other body part of the animal.
No, an individual may not leave an animal in a hot vehicle. Per California Penal Code section 597.7, an individual may not leave or confine an animal in any unattended vehicle under conditions that endanger the health or wellbeing of an animal due to weather and/or other circumstances.
Per California Penal Code section 597.7, circumstances that may jeopardize an animal’s health or wellbeing include:
Penalties associated with violating Penal Code section 597.7 depend upon whether the animal suffered from great bodily injury. If the animal does not suffer great bodily injury, the individual will likely face an infraction charge and pay fines up to $100. If the animal suffers great bodily injury, the individual may be charged with a misdemeanor and may face up to 6 months in jail and/or pay fines of up to $500.
When partitioning a property in-kind isn't possible, the court may order a partition by sale. This entails selling the property and dividing the earnings among the owners. The proceeds must be split equally and fairly amongst owners, just as they must be divided in kind. The entire property is sold as one piece of land in a partition by sale. When a division in kind isn't possible due to the structure of the real estate, a partition by sale proceeds. The court must evaluate the form of tenancy for the land and whether any exceptional conditions exist that would result in one co-owner receiving a bigger share of the sale. A partition by sale has a real estate attorney handling all of the discussions and court appearances for you as a co-owner. In effect, this minimizes problems. Previously, California courts favored partition in kind over partition by sale. The courts would only impose partition by sale in exceptional circumstances. Partition by sale has been more widespread in recent decades. Co-owning real estate is common. To be precise, it is particularly in urban or developed areas. If one or more co-owners object to a disputed property being sold, the court may allow them to buy out the shares of the co-owner who filed the partition action. This averts a forced sale.
Have you been involved in a real estate dispute? Do you co-own a property? A partition action may be applicable for you. Schedule a consultation to discuss your real estate matter. Contact KAASS Law Firm today at 310.943.1171.
The right to quiet enjoyment is frequently violated when landlords take part in “constructive eviction,” which is when they allow the living conditions to be so bad that a reasonable tenant would have to move out.
If the breach of your right to quiet enjoyment is not particularly severe, it may be a good idea to request in writing that they stop infringing on your rights before calling an attorney. You can eventually sue to get your rent refunded, and depending on the district, you may be able to recover compensation for physical/emotional damages caused by your landlord. However, it is advised you start the process in writing so there is a record of your complaint. For severe breaches of quiet enjoyment, especially ones that cause physical and emotional harm, you should seek legal representation immediately. You should also consider filing a police complaint, particularly in a situation where your landlord is harassing you or making you feel unsafe.
Crimes of child abduction and kidnapping should not be interpreted as the same. Kidnapping is a crime against the kidnapped person while child abduction is a crime against both the child abducted and the parent of the abducted child.
In case the defendant is a lawful custodian of the child, he cannot be found guilty of this offense. A parent entitled to custody cannot be liable for abducting his own child.
Taking a child from a person who is not the lawful custodian of the child is not considered a violation of California PC Section 278. However, depending on the case circumstances, the defendant may face charges for kidnapping.
A child can only be detained or taken in violation of custody or visitation order only if there is a reasonable belief and good faith that the child may suffer bodily injury or emotional harm by staying with a parent or legal guardian. In case the defendant detains a child for protection he must immediately contact the local District Attorney’s Child Abduction Unit and follow reporting instructions for escaping punishment.
California PC Section 278 is a wobbler and can either be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the case circumstances and the defendant’s criminal history.
Penalties for a PC 278 misdemeanor conviction include the following:
Penalties for a PC 278 felony conviction include the following:
Additionally, the defendant may be subject to pay restitution to the prosecuting agency, the victim or to any person acting on the victim's behalf, for any costs reasonably incurred in locating and returning the child to the victim.
The court will determine the penalty based on mitigating or aggravating factors presented by the prosecutor.
If you or a loved one has been arrested for Penal Code Section 278, child abduction we invite you to contact KAASS LAW (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation with our criminal defense attorney.
Wage garnishment goes into effect immediately after the court order is finalized.
No, under the Consumer Credit Protection Act, an employer is prohibited from firing an employee whose earnings are subject to garnishment for any one debt.
Not paying child support can lead to serious consequences, including being in contempt of court, which may lead to jail time. It is important to ask the court to change the child support amount should an individual lose their job or any other important change that decreases an individual’s income.
If you or someone you know is subject to wage garnishment and have further issues and/or questions, please contact us at 310.943.1171 for a free consultation. Our attorneys will evaluate the details of your matter and let you know what to expect and how you can proceed.
Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment means, for the purposes of needing a license, services that are there to promote treatment and maintain recovery from substance use disorder problems, which includes the list stated above.
The California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 9, Division 4, Chapter 5, section 10505 is the law that governs the requirement for licensing. Namely, it states that no person, firm, partnership, association, corporation, or local government entity shall operate, establish, manage, conduct, or maintain an alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility without obtaining a current, valid license pursuant to the chapter.
Yes, there are other requirements for those seeking to obtain a license. Those additional requirements include the following:
The California Code, Health and Safety Code section 11834.015 governs the requirements listed above. This code also states that "the department may implement, interpret, or make specific this section by means of plan or provider bulletins or similar instructions until regulations are adopted."
Yes, there are fees associated with licensing.
The application process normally takes about 120 days to complete. The first day counts as the day that the application packet was in fact in completion.
Those who are seeking further information on obtaining a license should read the instructions as well as the procedures.
For more information regarding DHCS Level of Care Designation.
Sexual assault and abuse at drug rehab centers are serious violations and criminal. If you or someone you know that is a victim of this act, please contact us right away.
Beyond the initial licensing process, operating a drug rehabilitation facility in California involves ongoing legal considerations, including:
Navigating the complex legal and regulatory landscape of drug rehabilitation licensing in California can be challenging. An experienced healthcare attorney can provide invaluable assistance to individuals and organizations seeking to establish or operate these facilities by:
At KAASS LAW, we are dedicated to supporting high-quality and ethical healthcare services throughout California. Additionally, we understand the critical role that licensed drug rehabilitation facilities play in helping individuals overcome substance use disorders. Finally, if you are seeking to establish a treatment center or need assistance navigating the licensing and regulatory requirements, our experienced attorneys are here to provide knowledgeable and effective legal guidance. Contact us today to learn how we can help you build a strong foundation for recovery.
Without a specific area of law mentioned in your prompt regarding AB 901, I will discuss potential areas where such a bill might have impact, allowing for a broader understanding of how legislative changes can affect businesses and consumers in California. Please note that the actual impact of AB 901 would depend on its specific language and the sector it addresses.
Regarding both consumers and business owners alike in California, staying informed regarding recent legislation such as AB 901 should be in their best interest. For instance, business owners understanding new laws is crucial for ensuring compliance. Furthermore, this helps with avoiding legal pitfalls and adapting business practices proactively. Failing to comply can result in fines, lawsuits, or potential reputational damages. Here at KAASS LAW, we offer consultation and legal services for any new or existing business owners and venture capitalists. In contrast, consumers should be aware of new legislation rules that empower individuals to understand their rights and consumer protection under CA law.
At KAASS LAW, we are dedicated to helping our clients navigate the complexities of California law. When new legislation like Assembly Bill Number 901 is enacted, our team stays informed and analyzes its potential impact on various sectors and individuals. We can provide:
We understand it is hard to keep up with constant law changes and its regulations. California rules can be complex. With that said, becoming a client with KAASS LAW, you gain access to an experienced legal team. In doing so, we're committed to keeping you informed and protected. We advise businesses and individuals to stay vigilant about new legislation like Assembly Bill Number 901 and to reach out. Should you have any questions or concerns, contact KAASS LAW right away!
The CNPP strengthens outreach to underserved businesses. CNPP does this by providing assistance to small businesses as well as entrepreneurs.
The following is a list of eligible applicants who may apply to receive the grant:
Those who are eligible may prepare to apply by providing the following:
Additionally, registering with the System for Award Management (SAM) is required in order to apply for the federal grant.
Before registering with SAM, use the SAM Status Tracker to check on your organization’s registration status. If your organization is already registered, take note of who is listed as the E-Business Point of Contact (EBiz POC).
SAM is a web-based, government-wide application that collects, validates, stores, and publicizes business information about the federal government’s trading partners in support of the contract awards, grants, and electronic payment processes.
As per Grants.gov, SAM requires a notarized letter stating you are the authorized entity administrator before SAM will activate your entity registration in SAM.gov. When your organization registers with SAM, you must designate an EBiz POC. Keep in mind it is the EBiz POC within your organization who must register your organization with SAM. Additionally, EBiz POC is also responsible for approving your Grant.gov roles request.
It takes up to two weeks to register with SAM after first completing the online registration and sending the notarized letter confirming the entity administrator. Additionally, it takes one business day for the updates to reflect on Grants.gov. Keep in mind that your organization must first have an EIN. Should your organization not have an EIN, it will take an additional 5 weeks to request and get an EIN from the IRS.
For purposes of Penal Code 597, torture refers to any intentional act, failure to act, or neglect that inflicts unnecessary physical pain or suffering on an animal. This includes actions or omissions that cause harm beyond what is necessary for the animal's care or treatment.
The acts that qualify as acting maliciously for purposes of Penal Code 597 involve an individual intentionally committing a wrongful act with the specific purpose of causing harm or injury. These acts are carried out with deliberate intent to inflict damage or suffering.
A violation of Penal Code section 597 may impact immigration status. California courts rule that serious cases of animal abuse can result in deportation, though this depends on the facts of the matter to determine its seriousness.
Yes, an individual can have their conviction of Penal Code section 597 expunged if they establish the following:
Please note that an expungement for a felony conviction does not qualify for an expungement.
If you facing charges under Penal Code 597, contact KAASS LAW at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation.
Aggravating factors may include:
These circumstances may influence the prosecutor's decision to classify the offense as a felony. On the other hand, mitigating circumstances may include:
Such factors may contribute to a more lenient sentence. Therefore, it is critical that the defendant consult with an experienced criminal defense attorney. The attorney will help determine whether there are mitigating circumstances in a particular case.
In addition to Section 597, California law provides other statutes governing liability for animal cruelty. 1. Section 597.1 applies when animals are kept in conditions that endanger their life or health. 2. Section 597.5 makes it a crime to participate in the organization or conduct of animal fighting. In addition, when cruelty to animals is accompanied by other criminal acts, such as:
The prosecutor may bring additional charges. This can significantly increase the length of possible incarceration.
A criminal record under Section 597 can have serious consequences for a person's future. In addition to jail time and fines, such an offense can affect immigration status. Serious cases of animal cruelty can be considered "crimes of moral turpitude. This is grounds for deportation.
If you have been charged under California Penal Code Section 597, it is important to seek legal help immediately. Contact KAASS LAW at 844-522-7752 for a free consultation to protect your rights. https://youtu.be/eXyhCCebEZc
An infraction is when there has been a violation of traffic laws, municipal codes, or administrative regulations. The penalties associated with infractions do not include jail time or probation but rather paying fines.
A misdemeanor pertains to criminal charges that carry up to one year of serving time in jail as well as associated fines.
Another individual may remove an animal from a hot vehicle without criminal liability so long as the individual did the following:
A violation of Penal Code 597.7 will not impact the immigration status of an individual.
If you or someone you know is facing charges under Penal Code 597.7, contact our Los Angeles criminal defense attorneys at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation. Our attorneys will evaluate the details of your case and let you know what to expect and how you can proceed.
The summer months can pose health risks to animals left in vehicles, especially when temperatures are high. It is important for pet owners to be aware of the risks that can arise from overheating or lack of air. It is important to remember that even with the windows closed, the temperature inside the car can quickly rise to dangerous levels. The time it takes for the temperature inside a car to become dangerous for an animal can be minimal.
Overheating is the main risk to animals left in a vehicle during hot weather. Animals can easily suffer from heat stroke, which results in:
This is especially important for animals with short noses, such as bulldogs or pugs, which are more susceptible to overheating. Lack of ventilation in the vehicle accelerates the temperature rise, making the situation even more dangerous.
Pet owners should take steps to protect their pets on hot days. If you must leave your pet in the car, try to park in the shade. Also, avoid leaving your pet in the car for too long. It is best to leave your pet at home or use the services of a friend or relative. Special pet carriers with ventilation systems are available. They can help keep your pet safe while traveling.
If you see an animal in a car in a dangerous situation, it is important not to remain indifferent. You should call:
And report the situation. If the animal is in real danger, you can take action on your own. California laws allow you to intervene in situations where an animal is in imminent danger.
Protecting pets from dangerous conditions on hot days is as much about protecting your pet's health as it is about obeying the law. It is not worth the risk of leaving your pet in a car, especially when the temperature is high. If you are facing charges under California Penal Code Section 597.7, contact KAASS LAW. We will be able to provide you with the best solution for your case. Call us at 844-522-7752 for a free consultation. https://youtu.be/1-V0d3C6Spw