How Insurance Companies Value Accident Injury Claims
Determining the Value of Accident Injury Claims: Insurance Companies Use a Program Called Colossus
It is possible that your insurance company uses or has used Colossus in the past to determine how much should they pay you for your injury.
Wait, so you mean a computer decides the value of my injuries? Yes, a computer program computes the value of human injuries. Sadly, many times, these settlement offers are unreasonably low. If you received an unreasonable settlement offer for your damages, you can file a bad faith claim against your insurance company with regards to the use of Colossus. If you believe that you may have a bad faith claim against your insurance company give KAASS LAW a call for a free consultation with a personal injury attorney or accident attorney. Our skilled Glendale personal injury lawyers, insurance litigation attorneys, economists, and negotiators work together to secure fair settlements.
A few things to keep in mind when you are considering to file a bad faith claim against your insurance company:
- Must show proof that the use or non-use of Colossus has affected your claim.
- Court cases that have determined claims were either unreasonable due to the use or non-use of Colossus are, Dauro v. Allstate Ins. Co., Dombach v. Allstate Insurance Co. and Wilson v. 21st Century Insurance Co.
- Class Action and The Use Of Colossus
The systematic use of Colossus has made insurance companies wary of class action suits, thus there are requirements in order to certify a class action suit.
Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Rule 23 requires the following: (1) the class is so numerous that joiner of all members is impracticable; (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class, and; (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. To certify a class under Rule 23(b)(3), questions of law or fact common to the members of the class must predominate over any questions affecting only individual members.”
What type of information do insurance companies input into Colossus?
- Liability – Use of a seat-belt increases value, as does the absence of intoxication
- Chiropractor – Referral from a regular doctor, in the records, increases value
- Spine Treatment – Must be documented specifically as to injury and why treatment is related to injury
- Medical Aids – Aids such as, walkers, crutches, and time needed are factors considered by the program
- Neck Collars – Different types of neck collars are treated differently
- Treatment Gaps – Delays in treatment decrease value so provide explanations for any, preferably documented in the medical records
- Permanency – COLOSSUS uses 4th Edition of the AMA Guidelines to Permanency and uses ratings only to body as a whole
- Loss of Enjoyment of Life – Can be considered if documented in medical records or reports
- Future Medical Bills and Wage Loss – Documentation from treating doctor needed for each to be considered
- Complaints – Any and all complaints should be documented in medical records
- Pre-existing Condition – Aggravation of it should be documented
- Aggravation – Degree of aggravation and permanency should be documented
- Hospital – Exact days of hospital stay and bed rest should be noted
- Treatment – Duration of treatment and any permanent use should be documented
- Pain, Depression, Anxiety – must be documented in medical records
Related Articles
View All Posts
Illinois limits private equity influence in law firms, reinforcing attorney independence, client confidentiality, and professional judgment.
A Downtown Los Angeles fatal stabbing and vehicle incident raises questions about wrongful death, negligence, and potential civil liability.
What Are California's Clean Car Rules?
Clean Car rules refer to California's vehicle emission standards aimed at reducing air pollution and greenhouse gases. These rules come from the California Air Resources Board (CARB). They require automakers to cut tailpipe emissions and produce zero-emission vehicles like electric or hydrogen-powered cars.
California's program is stricter than federal rules. Over a dozen other states have adopted these standards under Section 177 of the Clean Air Act.
Legal Challenge to Clean Car Standards Gains Traction
Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a lawsuit against California’s Clean Car rules to move forward. This case was brought by Republican-led states and industry groups. They claim that California's authority to set its own emission rules is unconstitutional.
The main argument revolves around the federal Clean Air Act. It allows California to request a waiver to impose stricter standards. The plaintiffs argue that these waivers create confusion and impose unfair burdens on car manufacturers. Automakers must then meet both federal and California standards.
Supreme Court Declines to Block the Case
The Supreme Court did not rule on the lawsuit’s outcome. Instead, it simply allowed the case to continue in lower courts. This reverses earlier decisions that blocked the case on jurisdictional grounds.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta has promised to defend the rules. Environmental groups also support the Clean Car program, citing public health and climate benefits.
What This Means for Automakers and Consumers
If the challenge succeeds, California might lose its power to enforce stricter emissions rules. Automakers would likely reduce investments in zero-emission vehicles for the California market.
Consumers could see fewer Clean Car options and increased vehicle emissions. If California wins, the state could continue shaping national clean vehicle policy and technology.
Environmental and Health Impacts
Clean Car standards are about more than climate change. They address serious public health concerns. Vehicle emissions worsen smog and trigger asthma and heart conditions, especially in cities.
California suffers from some of the worst air pollution in the U.S. Areas like Los Angeles and the Central Valley are most affected. Clean Car rules aim to reduce the harm caused by millions of vehicles.
To learn more about vehicle pollution and public health, visit the Environmental Defense Fund.
Legal Battle Over State vs. Federal Power
This lawsuit raises big questions about federalism. Should California be able to set stricter rules than the federal government?
The Clean Air Act gives California the right to apply for waivers. That’s because the state has struggled with air pollution for decades.
Opponents argue these waivers give California too much control over national markets. Supporters say they drive innovation and protect public health.
The Trump administration revoked California’s waiver. President Biden later restored it. The back-and-forth has led to legal uncertainty.
Clean Car Standards Drive the Electric Vehicle Future
No matter how this case ends, the shift toward electric vehicles (EVs) is underway. Automakers like Tesla, Ford, and GM are heavily investing in EVs.
Clean Car rules helped build charging infrastructure and encouraged EV adoption. Weakening these rules might slow progress. But market forces and climate goals will likely keep the EV transition moving forward.
KAASS LAW’s Legal Insight
At KAASS LAW, we closely track cases like the Clean Car challenge. Environmental laws affect businesses, consumers, and government entities alike. Our attorneys are ready to help you understand and respond to these legal changes.
Visit our Business Law page to learn how we assist clients with compliance and litigation. We also handle Lawsuits and Litigation in various sectors, including environmental matters.
What Happens Next?
The case returns to lower courts for full litigation. Both sides will present their arguments. A final decision may take years.
Until then, Clean Car standards remain active. Automakers, regulators, and environmental groups will be watching closely. The ruling could reshape national clean air policy.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s action allows a high-stakes lawsuit against California’s Clean Car rules to move forward. The outcome will affect state powers, public health, and the auto industry.
Whether you’re a business, consumer, or policymaker, the decisions made in this case could impact you. Contact KAASS LAW to learn how we can help you navigate these evolving legal landscapes.
